Mafiascum.net

These switches to Majiffy when mollie is in danger...

mollie/Venmar/qwints it is.

Argh. Majiffy's last post was quite the logical, townish post. .

I need to ISO the candidates again and see what I'm voting. I'll have to take a closer look at Mollie.

Eh, the burden of proficiency tell by qwints sucks, and I have no idea what sera sees in Majiffy's last post. It really wasn't saying anything new.

This game...

serra can you vote mollie again?

In post 2924, qwints wrote:Looks like at least one of Majiffy/mollie is definitely scum, this doesn't seem like the right time for them to break their mutual town reads if they were both scum.

Majiffy has dominated the game in a way that hasn't helped town. Given his influence in the game, and the skill I normally see from him, I don't think we'd be where we were if he were town motivated.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Majiffy

>Majiffy catches Mollie in a direct lie in the post RIGHT BEFORE THIS
>Votes Majiffy

In post 2927, serrapaladin wrote:Eh, the burden of proficiency tell by qwints sucks, and I have no idea what sera sees in Majiffy's last post. It really wasn't saying anything new.

This game...

.. It was saying that Mollie was blatantly lying.

Wait, hold on, I think I said something before that covers this...

In post 2923, Majiffy wrote:u r idjit.

In post 2923, Majiffy wrote:

In post 2910, pirate mollie wrote:

In post 2883, serrapaladin wrote:

Yeah, but he claimed that he challenged so he could see mollie's reaction, which I'm inclined to believe

.

I don't not for 1 second.

fucking A, the timing of when he did this was bad bad bad and

he knew this

. he immediately places a vote on me to test "my reaction" but I don't get from what he has said that he was even interested in my reaction.

*Ahem*

Spoiler: Exhibit A

In post 2562, Majiffy wrote:I, for one, am satisfied with the Elyse lynch. Didn't hit scum, but whatevz.

Challenge: Silver

Time for Mollie to rage at me.

In post 2566, Majiffy wrote:Wait was that no to you not raging at me or no to Wisdom voting me?

In post 2568, Majiffy wrote:Mollieeeee

In post 2571, Majiffy wrote:Ok.

Why aren't you freaking out like last time I challenged?

It really doesn't get any more clear-cut than that.

I mean... Wait, Mollie has the words for this;

In post 2910, pirate mollie wrote:jesus christ it is right there in there in the thread.

In post 2913, serrapaladin wrote:Actually no, screw this. I still want to say they're both town, but if I'm wrong about one, I'd rather have it be scum-mollie looking too town to be scum than scum-Majiffy's actions being bad play for scum. If that means I just let scum-mollie AtE me off a good vote then I apologise, but I'm more comfortable with this:

VOTE: Majiffy

u r idjit.

where is the lie

In post 2931, pirate mollie wrote:where is the lie

You mean where you said you have no idea where I was looking for your reactions when it was clearly evident by my posts that I was fishing for one?

I'm not seeing the "lie."

She said Majiffy was not interested in her reaction when his posts show that he was.

That's wrong, not a lie.

If she knows it's wrong and says it anyway, isn't it a lie?

In post 2910, pirate mollie wrote:he immediately places a vote on me to test "my reaction" but I don't get from what he has said that he was even interested in my reaction.

This isn't a lie, it's just a different interpretation of Majiffy's actions. You realise scum-Majiffy could want the appearance of pressuring mollie without actually caring about her reaction, right? I'm not saying she's necessarily right about this, but it's certainly not a lie.

Nah, it's the way scum-mollie deals with accusations.

But you literally just said you think she lied. If you just think her dealing with accusations seems like scum-mollie then fine, but calling it a lie that she's been interpreting Majiffy's intention differently to you is a bit of a misrep.

Prod received sorry, been having personal issues irl.

Ok I'm back to

The one post changed my mind a little because it was the first logical, clearly laid out thing he has written. However, calling mollies statement a lie is exaggerating a bit much! This is another example of what keeps irking me and seems off all the time. So I dunno, I gotta go with my gut.

I did re-look at all 3 up for lynch but I can read scum or town into anyone I feel so I'm kind of at a loss.

Sigh. No clue which of the two is mollie's buddy...

In post 2942, SeraphicMirth wrote:However, calling mollies statement a lie is exaggerating a bit much!

You're a fucking moron. You know what she said immediately after she said she couldn't find any trace of me looking for her reaction? "jesus christ its right there in the thread".

SHE IS CLAIMING I DID NOT SHOW ANY SIGN OF LOOKING FOR HER REACTION.
IT IS EVIDENT I WAS.
ERGO
SHE IS FUCKING LYING.

You pile of fucking bricks.

Good god how can so many stupid people play this fucking game.

Well some of them are just scum.

The problem is which is scum - qwints who voted Majiffy the instant mollie was in danger, or Seraphic who comes and sheeps what other people say "omg this was not a lie" and uses that to vote Majiffy as well?

1) I replaced here as a favor after not playing any form of mafia in years so I don't need your insults and calm the fuck down, kthnx.
2) I interpreted that as she didn't see it when she first read and then re read and realized it? So that is why I think calling it a lie is a bit much. Just because someone interpreted something a different way than you meant it doesn't make it a lie. Why would she point out her own mistake/"lie" if it was intentional?
What I do think is scummy is taking something minor and blowing it out of proportion.

In post 2948, SeraphicMirth wrote:Why would she point out her own mistake/"lie" if it was intentional?

What are you talking about?