Mafiascum.net

In post 2925, Titus wrote:I get why Dunn takes that shot.

In post 2926, Dunnstral wrote:What do you think of my claim?

In post 2927, Wake1 wrote:

In post 2925, Titus wrote:I get why Dunn takes that shot.

Then why?

He said it was because he was after Lapsa and two others, but I want to know the clincher that made him kill Lapsa.

In post 1583, Wake1 wrote:Since Vedith has replaced Nosferatu I will give the slot one chance.

VOTE: Sickofit1138

In post 2109, Wake1 wrote:

In post 2107, Transcend wrote:VOTE: wake

U piss me off....


But ur prob town. Just had to throw a vote your way out of spite.

VOTE: Vedith

Bring it, Cupcake.

Why Vedith? I haven't ISO'd him but I suppose I could.

In post 2190, Wake1 wrote:

In post 2188, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 2170, Dunnstral wrote:And what about you Wake, will you vote sickofit/vedith?

I'm open to lynching that slot. Nosferatu was Scummy because he would not provide any content behind his words. Vedith I have not ISO'd. Tentatively I'd be open to voting him Day 1, but the slot hasn't been as bad as other slots. If it were a choice between no lynch or Sickofit1138 I'd choose the latter.

In post 2202, Wake1 wrote:

In post 2199, Dunnstral wrote:

~HISTORY~

Day 1

~ I ask in 2170 for confirmation that

Wake88

is willing to lynch

Sickofit1138

and

Vedith

Day 1.

Wake88

hesitantly

replies 'Yes' to both in 2190.

Don't be underhanded.

I'm willing to lynch that slot today but I haven't ISO'd him so in spite of willing to lynch him I'm not certain he's Scum. I haven't ISO'd Vedith either.

In post 2503, Wake1 wrote:

We have a little over 5 days left.

Though I think Titus would be a wise lynch, I don't think we will have the votes in time Day 1.

This means either AGar or Vedith, unless a better option happens.

I really didn't like how Nosferatu wouldn't provide content. That said, I don't know his Town meta.

Glancing at Vedith's ISO, I notice he has not once mentioned my name, or asked me a question, or challenged me. I demand confrontation. Engagement.

Boem_u_dusi, could you better explain your 2058, where you say Vedith's posts are weak? I feel that requires clarity. Dunnstral saying that Vedith's posts are worse than Nosferatu's doesn't ring true from where I'm standing (2090).

...then again, it doesn't feel like Vedith is

not

trying to be noticed. I'm thinking about who

is

escaping my awareness...

Vedith's 2305 doesn't make me want to vote him.

Why?

He's got a point. There's little resistance to his wagon. I believe we're in Multiball. There's been a fuck-ton of nonsensical resistance to other wagons.

I'd rather see Titus lynched. All this resistance—all this hellbent fighting—to keep Titus from being lynched especially when she's a random like everyone else who has been found to have lied to everyone... it makes zero sense.

It's a sign. There's very little resistance to Vedith's wagon, but an immense—blatantly obvious—amount of resistance against Titus's wagon. Like certain people are bending over to save their teammate from getting lynched.

Tell me I'm wrong. Tell me it doesn't feel like we're in Multiball. Tell me Titus, being a random like the rest of us, doesn't have a suspicious amount of resistance to her wagon. Tell me Vedith's wagon has a lot of resistance. Just look at the game.

I'm paying attention to the

actions

.

VOTE: Titus

In post 2846, Wake1 wrote:

In post 2845, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 2843, Wake1 wrote:So if it's multi-ball then both killed Lapsa

Why are you assuming it's multi-ball

when there was only one kill? Which I claimed

I don't think mafia would target lapsa. I think it was doctored or roleblocked (and yes, if it was a roleblocker type they should out it)

Do not

put words in my mouth.

I consider the possibilities. I do not assume.

If you're Town,

don't do that

.

In post 2928, Titus wrote:

In post 2926, Dunnstral wrote:What do you think of my claim?

I don't think I should answer that. Obvious reasons.

Transcend wrote:Airick is town



guys

he's town

just like me

Wake88 wrote:If you have a point in 2930, make it plain.

Wake88 wrote:Zach, are you willing to lynch Dunnstral or Titus Day 2?

In post 2935, Zachstralkita wrote:

Wake88 wrote:If you have a point in 2930, make it plain.

You said don't put words in his mouth but the quotes appear to indicate you are indeed assuming multiball

Wake88 wrote:Zach, are you willing to lynch Dunnstral or Titus Day 2?

only if it's an ultimatum between you/Titus TBH

In post 2936, Wake1 wrote:

In post 2935, Zachstralkita wrote:

Wake88 wrote:If you have a point in 2930, make it plain.

You said don't put words in his mouth but the quotes appear to indicate you are indeed assuming multiball

Wake88 wrote:Zach, are you willing to lynch Dunnstral or Titus Day 2?

only if it's an ultimatum between you/Titus TBH

That was before there was only one kill, which was claimed by the supposed 1-Shot Vig.

SO... you refuse to be willing to lynch Dunnstral or Titus unless they're 1v1'ing me.

OK, let me make a note of that.

...

Alright, who ARE you willing to lynch?

In post 2828, Zachstralkita wrote:Ok scum probably targeted me LMFAO but I had someone looking out for me

In post 2829, Dunnstral wrote:Probably no kill from mafia because I got docced.

Almost50 wrote:

In post 2828, Zachstralkita wrote:Ok scum probably targeted me LMFAO but I had someone looking out for me

In post 2829, Dunnstral wrote:Probably no kill from mafia because I got docced.

Anyone else want to claim NOT doctor??

In post 2831, Dunnstral wrote:Not sure why you were blaming me when you were also at fault for not saying L-1 and having voted as well

In post 2843, Wake1 wrote:Should we entertain the notion that if there's a Town PR like Jailkeeper or Roleblocker they should out who they targeted?

In post 2859, implosion wrote:VOTE: Almost50

In post 2862, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: implosion