Mafiascum.net

In post 2924, Firebringer wrote:VOTE: mastina

And then this is suspicious as heck too. From what little I know about him, Firebringer would be doing just the opposite of what I wanted, simply because it's me because it's was his MO throughout several games.

i really like my pirate hat here.

Arghhhh ye matie.
I be a real pirate

What Vecna said

i think rc made some mod mistakes in that vc

Gonna wait for another VC, then.
If the gladiate worked, from what Mastina claimed, then the target is town?
So then what do we do?

Feels like I'm being taken for a fucking ruse cruise.

I'm strongman killing MEME MAN tonight

why

His slot sucks

Okay, why is everyone ignoring us when both of us say that mastina should be lynched.

@Creature
@Vecna

Put your money where your mouth is and vote there.

If we lose, I am blaming Creature for thinking that role indicates alignment.

in spite of SU2, a game he played, proving otherwise.

Oh, and by the way.

Im sitting on the sidelines, observing.

Fascinatingly, I might

add

So many gunclaims all of a sudden while there was only 1 kill on N1.

In post 2921, Creature wrote:I'm not ignoring you. You didn't ask anything.

I asked you for some sweet words

Mod error made in previous vote ount

Here's something you guys clearly haven't thought about;

wrt the loyal modifier that Mastina claimed, we have 4 possibilities:

1. True claim as town
2. True claim as scum
3. Semi-true claim as scum (Not loyal, but a modifier that allows only the targeting of town)
4. Fakeclaim


I think it would be dumb af to fakeclaim something like that day 1 because it would allow for a rolecop guilty. Furthermore, the flavour of Ginngie makes perfect sense with only being allowed to target town, which eliminates the second option and imo the fourth option. Leashing her for clears is optimal play. Scum!Mastina would also have realised this and faked a guilty by not using the ability by now in the third scenario. Therefore we are looking at scenario 1.

In post 2927, Firebringer wrote:Arghhhh ye matie.
I be a real pirate

Yarr the blood runs cold
We take our loot but don't get old

Maybe tomorrow I'll case the shit out of NicoRobin because I've just got like 3 separate things pinging me about her play rn

In post 2942, Vecna wrote:

In post 2921, Creature wrote:I'm not ignoring you. You didn't ask anything.

I asked you for some sweet words

Yeah you asked me why was I ignoring you and I answered.

In post 2946, jjh927 wrote:Maybe tomorrow I'll case the shit out of NicoRobin because I've just got like 3 separate things pinging me about her play rn

Like what?

In post 2944, jjh927 wrote:Here's something you guys clearly haven't thought about;

wrt the loyal modifier that Mastina claimed, we have 4 possibilities:

1. True claim as town
2. True claim as scum
3. Semi-true claim as scum (Not loyal, but a modifier that allows only the targeting of town)
4. Fakeclaim


I think it would be dumb af to fakeclaim something like that day 1 because it would allow for a rolecop guilty.

Furthermore, the flavour of Ginngie makes perfect sense with only being allowed to target town

, which eliminates the second option and imo the fourth option. Leashing her for clears is optimal play. Scum!Mastina would also have realised this and faked a guilty by not using the ability by now in the third scenario. Therefore we are looking at scenario 1.

This is the exact thing I am advising against: making assumptions based on the role and the flavor. That's not something you do.