In post 2914, Cinnamon wrote:I'm not sold on the idea that's going around of bad reads from urap --> scum urap
I mean, this isnt exactly an accurate representation of the reasons he's scum here, that's more like the cherry on top
Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2019 1:23 am
by skitter30
In post 2921, teacher wrote:The one aside I have on both URaP wagons I have noticed is that both times it felt like Skitter pushed and derailed, though I played a role in that both times as well)
I tend to get antsy when i feel like wagons are building fast
Nom has an uncanny gift of being able to completely conf!scum themselves whenever I give that slot the slightest bit of leeway and plausibility
Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2019 5:10 am
by nomnomnom
In post 2933, Vorkuta wrote:Nom has an uncanny gift of being able to completely conf!scum themselves whenever I give that slot the slightest bit of leeway and plausibility
I honestly have stopped to understand what you were on about for a good few days now and the cryptic messaging doesn't help, really.
Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2019 5:12 am
by teacher
BuJ was saying urap and I are scum together and vork was agreeing.
Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2019 5:12 am
by nomnomnom
In post 2935, teacher wrote:BuJ was saying urap and I are scum together and vork was agreeing.
The miller claim plus reaction to the modifier inquisition - felt like a genuine interaction/interplay. Its weaker because they have not been town-telling themselves in the way a miller should. Im used to Cinnamon having really good intuitive feels. RN, I couldnt tell you a single strong stance they've taken all game.
In post 2821, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: u r a person 2
L-2, I hope to get some kind of claim from you soon because there is a lot of pressure directed your way
VT
reads list soon
Is this a formal claim?
It's just is half-heartedly inserted there and not emphasized so I'd like confirmation
Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2019 5:15 am
by teacher
Could someone for the love kindly interact with me on Nero? I've laid out the source of my conflicts, but there are alot of townreads there and understanding them gives me a good direction to go.
In post 2821, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: u r a person 2
L-2, I hope to get some kind of claim from you soon because there is a lot of pressure directed your way
VT
reads list soon
Is this a formal claim?
It's just is half-heartedly inserted there and not emphasized so I'd like confirmation
Doesnt the post like right after this answer the question???? Are you going for the SaladMan award today?
Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2019 5:17 am
by skitter30
I dont townread him
Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2019 5:18 am
by Vorkuta
He bleeds town to me
I've played a few games with nero to know that this is how he goes off on people, the types of appeals he makes, and the comradery between us only strengthens my case.
Like I don't want to think that he'd abuse the communist hydra gimmic you know?
I know scum has to play to their wincon, has to play to win THIS game, and not to make friends and be happy, but like...
Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2019 5:19 am
by nomnomnom
In post 2942, Vorkuta wrote:Like I don't want to think that he'd abuse the communist hydra gimmic you know?
so I think actually implying that I'm just not going to claim is a more reasonable way of avoiding a lynch than fake claiming as town
he could be
talking about
hypothetical VTs
that may or may not
exist in this game
Look- I like my claims to be nice, explicit, grandiose, bold, and with a bit more fanfair.
Like I know for all intents and purposes that he's locked into claiming VT and that any redaction/180 just won't flu