Mafiascum.net

@profii: Final answer? Shall I sheep you here or would you be switching votes within the next 50 posts??

In post 2925, profii wrote:VOTE: alonzo

Scummy

Intent to sheep hopkirks reads till I dont

VOTE:

1- Vote on profii is OMGUS
2- States inntention to sheep Hopkirk (who is voting gobble) then votes pofii
3- Overall reaction sucks
4- The goat made me

In post 2926, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:@profii: Final answer? Shall I sheep you here or would you be switching votes within the next 50 posts??

I'm not a particularly fast vote switcher but I'm not going to tell anyone what to do

I said sheep reads not votes, but I'd be fine with a gobble lynch.

In post 2930, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:VOTE:

1- Vote on profii is OMGUS
2- States inntention to sheep Hopkirk (who is voting gobble) then votes pofii
3- Overall reaction sucks
4- The goat made me

I think you forgot something.

I dont think we should lynch gobble tbh

In post 2884, Garmr wrote:1.He had no issues believing in Tchills claim despite Scum reading them through out the game. He doesn't second guess himself either This indicates to me he comes from a place of knowing.

Tchill's claim is believable, regardless of previous read. PRs tend to play vaguely scummy so as not to get NK'd. There is a meta element at play. He's also loosely committed to a future course of action and if his claim is false it will be possible to tell.

2. Stayed clear of both elements and cliff booth despite scum reading cliff and putting elements in his not town motivated posting. He opened himself to lynch both but didn't make a decision despite being active.

Unlike a lot of people I thought Elements claim was real. Cliff's play changed and my read changed with it. If you bothered to look at timing and context of when those changes happened you'd know this.

3. Despite a lot of post he doesn't have many very solid stances. Like the closet to commitment he has is his vote on me and it's badly played with little to no pushes at all. If he was hunting you think he would commit to one thing and actually push.

Your voyeur claim is fake. I don't believe that anyone can be that bad a player to use the role in that way. That's not what you do. Saying it was to "protect" carcalilly by making scum think there is a doctor doesn't hold water. You backtracked when you found out that what you claimed was impossible, and nobody seems to care that the thing you backtracked from was blatantly .

Your whole "case" is aimed at attacking mine, even though amazingly enough nobody but me sees how fake your claim was and how good my case is. Including the "not about me" section is a nice try at making it seem not OMGUS but what you're saying in that section is patently false. You complain that I'm not pushing anything else, when I have caught scum already. I may be wrong, I never claim to be perfect, but there is no denying that from my point of view, this is a valid push on the strongest lead we have at this point in the game.

As for other opinions (that you claim I don't have)...

I think Eevee is a good lynch.
I think Hectic's incessant inclusion of non-game material is an attempt at obfuscation and I wouldn't mind lynching there either.
Whomever it was that made early comments about both watcher and tracker looks informed, unless it's one of those roles. (I don't remember and haven't had time to look)
Carcalilly was town without being mason and that whole thing is a huge forehead slap. <in case you didn't figure it out, my brief vote there was behavior modification, not related at all to an actual read>
JJD is someone who looks townie but would be the hidden scum if it comes down to lylo.
Profii needs to be checked vs. the BooneyToons game he was scum in.
Rick Dalton is another player who would fit deepscum if it came to that.
In a game that's likely to be role heavy certain behaviors can and should be selectively overlooked -- there is a subtle difference between softplaying and avoiding and I'm giving softplaying a temporary pass based on the (apparent) game type.

I can't remember if I said today was going to be a heavier day for activity due to being off work. I am indeed off today, but my wife wanted to go to an event so paradoxically that meant having less computer time, not more.

Pedit: spicy vote, thoughts beyond just the throwdown?

In post 2933, davesaz wrote:

In post 2930, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:VOTE:

1- Vote on profii is OMGUS
2- States inntention to sheep Hopkirk (who is voting gobble) then votes pofii
3- Overall reaction sucks
4- The goat made me

I think you forgot something.

Um.. erm.. me.. derp!

VOTE: Alonzo

It's funny though that he responded as if I did vote him!

In post 2935, Carcalilly wrote:VOTE: judge Joseph dredd

Thank you for showing your interest in me, miss charms

Alonzo are you actually going to do anything other than cast blatant OMGUS votes?

In post 2936, davesaz wrote:Your voyeur claim is fake. I don't believe that anyone can be that bad a player to use the role in that way. That's not what you do. Saying it was to "protect" carcalilly by making scum think there is a doctor doesn't hold water. You backtracked when you found out that what you claimed was impossible, and nobody seems to care that the thing you backtracked from was blatantly

not what that role should do

.

As much as I'd love for this to be true, I think this is town!Garmr. From what I can gather looking at his meta, town!Garmr does stupid shit like this all the time.

In post 2938, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:

In post 2935, Carcalilly wrote:VOTE: judge Joseph dredd

Thank you for showing your interest in me, miss charms

youve been very interesting to me the entire game and I seen to have been procrastinating on that thought

i wouldnt mind a dredd vote either. adding to the death list

In post 2942, EeveeLution Army wrote:i wouldnt mind a dredd vote either. adding to the death list

I am only accepting female voters at this time, thank you very much.

In post 2943, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:

In post 2942, EeveeLution Army wrote:i wouldnt mind a dredd vote either. adding to the death list

I am only accepting female voters at this time, thank you very much.

Titus! Mind backing me up on this?

VOTE: JJD

Not sure on this but I want to see how JJD v Alonzo plays out.

Man I've got a lot to catch up on, I've just got back off holiday. This is going to take some time.

In post 2870, Alonzo wrote:

In post 2755, Cliff Booth wrote:

In post 2716, Alonzo wrote:@cliff

Riding solo or hydra? Sorry cba to go and look

5 heads on this hydra

In post 2759, Cliff Booth wrote:VOTE: Alonzo

In post 2763, Cliff Booth wrote:Alonzo has provided nothing after replacing a slot that provided nothing

In post 2765, Cliff Booth wrote:He's also talked about me in like 1/3 of his posts so far and I really don;t like that

In post 2767, Cliff Booth wrote:

In post 2121, Alonzo wrote:

In post 2120, profii wrote:There is a chance Rick Dalton is scum

I think the chances of Rick being scum increase if cliff tells me he is townreading Rick.

Do you townread Rick cliff?

I also still dont get this and he never elaborated on it. Also never did anything when I said rick was town

Because I want to sort you?

This lamesauce vote and reason is a long way from day one Rick Vs Elem.

I thought I recognised your style day one which is why I ask (seriously) about hydra status

I'm not a hydra and it feels like you're trying to buddy me

Let me get this straight.

I vote alonzo, he claims that I only did so because he was trying to sort me?

He votes bob with no reasoning given, right after bob was trying to sort him?

Then he OMGUS votes profii?

Am I missing something?