In post 2928, Gamma Emerald wrote:I’m just kinda watching the MCat-Titus interaction with a bowl of popcorn rn
Yeah mostly.
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2020 7:42 pm
by MURDERCAT
GRRR
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2020 7:45 pm
by Titus
Sorry if I bore you. I just want to attach the bell to a cat.
[/joke]
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2020 7:52 pm
by MURDERCAT
HONESTLY I WAS JUST WAITING FOR YOU TO ADMIT THAT YOU WERE WRONG AND I WAS GOING TO SERIOUSLY CONSIDER VOTING BELL
BUT DOUBLING DOWN WHEN YOUR CENTRAL THESIS IS WRONG DOES NOT GIVE ME CONFIDENCE THAT YOU ARE GENUINELY SOLVING ANYTHING
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2020 7:58 pm
by Titus
Why would you be voting bell here? Is my reasoning persuasive aside from being wrong on you fypov?
Why would my being wrong on you matter to you thinking I was solving or not?
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:03 pm
by MURDERCAT
BECAUSE YOU AREN'T RECONSIDERING AFTER REALIZING I DIDN'T DO THE THING YOU SAID I DID
I WOULD BE VOTING BELL BECAUSE OF TALY NOT YOU
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:07 pm
by Titus
Well, why does everyone have to have the same reason for voting Bell? If I am uncredible that shouldn't make Taly uncredible. Instead, you should look at each premise and decide.
Someone who is wrong about one thing might be right on another. Show me that independent thought.
What do you think of my Bell thoughts? Taly's?
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:16 pm
by MURDERCAT
LOL WHY SHOULD I INTERACT WITH YOU AFTER YOU SCUM READ ME, I PROVED YOU WRONG, AND YOU STUCK WITH IT?
OBVIOUSLY ANYTHING I SAY TO YOU WON'T CHANGE YOUR READ
I AM VOTING YOU BECAUSE YOU ARE ACTING SCUMMY, IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH BELL ANYMORE
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:21 pm
by Titus
Interacting with me and discussing the substance of your reads is how I reevaluate people.
If you sit on your hands and reject everything while refusing to scumhunt, I am going to believe you are scum with Bell.
You have a chance to prove me wrong that you have original thoughts. Run with it.
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:25 pm
by Gamma Emerald
Okay I wanted to give y’all space to work shit out yourselves but that failed miserably
I feel like MCat maybe hopped on Titus a little fast about reconsidering the read on him. I also feel like it’s justified as I didn’t see Titus recalibrate on any level when disproven there. Titus seems more reasonable here but really should have shown some consideration of the thing MCat is upset about.
I’m getting the vibe this is a TvT that if left unchecked will distract from productive eliminations.
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:31 pm
by MURDERCAT
UNVOTE:
STILL DUMB
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:34 pm
by Titus
There's still room on the Bell wagon MURDERCAT. You don't have to agree with me if you have your own independent reasoning.
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:37 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 2940, Titus wrote:There's still room on the Bell wagon MURDERCAT. You don't have to agree with me if you have your own independent reasoning.
This is very much true
Part of the thing I referenced earlier about forming wagons in large games says to let people form their own conclusions and join for their own reasons rather than forcing yours upon them
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2020 12:08 am
by Bell
I'me lurkinge thise oute
Soe, like, ife you're expectinge me toe towne spewe ine ye olde english, ain'te happeninge.
Nbdy shld b clrd n ths vdnc ln. t's smthng tht's bsc fr mpstrs t pll n th ctl gm.
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2020 2:47 am
by Taly
some passing thoughts
I'd like to see
Titus
acknowledge my points on
Murder
or at least his frustration so I can trust that she evaluates him in good faith.
Gamma
, where are you at with
Titus
right now?
Murder
, where were you going with that
TGP
vote?
Bell wrote:I'me lurkinge thise oute
Soe, like, ife you're expectinge me toe towne spewe ine ye olde english, ain'te happeninge.
As EVERYBODY learned EoD1, I'm VERY patient.
This strategy isn't productive because it's not going to dispel my worries with your slot. So I'd like you to answer my question when I posed the vote.
Nbdy shld b clrd n ths vdnc ln. t's smthng tht's bsc fr mpstrs t pll n th ctl gm.
OK, I can see a counterpoint to
Titus/Haschel
but I think it's best we assume
Titus'
POV here. We have nothing else to go off of.
But I do want Haschel to validate Titus' statement. That those two were alone in a room last night.
Also, my first task is only half-finished. I'm staying in Admin tonight.
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2020 2:52 am
by Taly
post linking 2113 because that chart has too many color tags for me to care about quoting and editing it to fit my restriction.
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2020 2:53 am
by Bell
I'me aware Talye. Ie juste can'te. It'se juste toe annoyinge toe poste like thise.
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2020 2:55 am
by Taly
In post 2580, Taly wrote:
I townread Taly. I scumread Taly.
I townread Alisae slot. I scumread Alisae slot.
I townread Haschel. I scumread Haschel.
I townread Murder. I scumread Murder.
I townread Gamma. I scumread Gamma.
I townread Blitzo. I scumread Blitzo.
I townread Pooky. I scumread Pooky.
I townread Titus. I scumread Titus.
I townread Flea. I scumread Flea.
I townread Battle. I scumread Battle.
I townread OWER. I scumread OWER.
I townread Bell. I scumread Bell.
I townread DGB. I scumread DGB.
I townread TGP. I scumread TGP
youre restriction doesn'te worke one quotes, does ite?
I'de rather note riske it, Ie haven't been informed bye mode thate I failde ite soe fare, bute thise methode feels like skirtinge ite compared toe Reck whoe hase ae quotes restriction. Infacte, I'me pretty confidente that'se the case.
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2020 3:11 am
by Bell
toe be cleare, it'se note ae goode faithe waye toe followe ite when used thise waye ine thise context. Ie wonder ife Ie shoulde be givinge ye scume pointes fore thate, bute Nahe ye asked whiche ise the responsible thinge toe do.