In post 359, Gypyx wrote:thinking about it, mastina, maybe you should put a reduction to the number of peeps who should visit you? Like, restrict it to half the PL or something, cuz i doubt we'd gain much worth from 4-5 of our powerful PRs taking a shot on you on the long term
also VOTE: alexandrite less talk more scrap
Ok this is plus town points for mastina. Not sure what her claim is but I don't see this as S v S.
Titus is so obviously town here it hurts, just like Gamma and doubling down on Mastina very likely being just wrong town.
This was the accurate VC at the time of 861 as well. Gypyx and imaginality distancing while imaginality leaves an out and then votes a vanity wagon hoping both go away.
Hard pass on this being clearing.
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2021 6:46 am
by Truth Innuendos Lies
In post 2924, Titus wrote:Looking through imaginality in response to Gypyx asking him to clarify his pushes on Dwlee Ralts and himself, imaginality doesn't. He pokes around elsewhere a bit and then votes mastina.
This is definitely not clearing.
Could be? Considering that Wisdom has hard distanced his buddies in so many of his scumgames, he shouldn’t be so quick to clear either Imaginality or Valkyrie for that.
Can you link/quote that post? I’ve been feeling his play here seems different here because he was so extremely engaged and solvy in OMB and he also seems tonally different here.
~I
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2021 6:47 am
by Titus
In post 1242, SleepyKrew wrote:a little teaser: searched my name and I think I'm gonna be properly pushing STD unless the Gypyx wagon really speaks to me
In post 2924, Titus wrote:Looking through imaginality in response to Gypyx asking him to clarify his pushes on Dwlee Ralts and himself, imaginality doesn't. He pokes around elsewhere a bit and then votes mastina.
This is definitely not clearing.
Could be? Considering that Wisdom has hard distanced his buddies in so many of his scumgames, he shouldn’t be so quick to clear either Imaginality or Valkyrie for that.
Can you link/quote that post? I’ve been feeling his play here seems different here because he was so extremely engaged and solvy in OMB and he also seems tonally different here.
~I
Sure. Second. It's actually an exchange.
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2021 6:49 am
by Titus
Spoiler: ForTIL
In post 846, imaginality wrote:I don't like Gypyx and Ralts jumping on mastina's comment about the people who see TSQ v STD as TvT being more likely scum than not.
It seemed like deliberately reading the comment in the worst way.
Ralts raised it as a question whereas Gypyx continued to paint it as though mastina was calling herself scummy even after reading mastina's reply to Ralts. Which, like, I don't see why Gypyx bothers to post that as town, but as scum it is a chance to splash a bit of dirt on someone.
VOTE: Gypyx
On STD v TSQ my initial take was slightly suspicious of STD and pro town on TSQ. Someone mentioned TSQ plays like that as scum also so that tempers my town read slightly but I still like his side of it. Still figuring out how I feel about the STD side of it. I didn't see the initial post as scummy but the initial reaction to TSQ's pressure did feel a bit hmmm... Like, I didn't like the retrofitting 'oh but look at the reactions I generated' part of the conversation. However there was also a hint of confused 'what are you on about'-ness to it.
Interesting also at Gypyx defended STD against TSQ early in that debate.
In post 847, imaginality wrote:Oh cool add Dwlee99 to Gypyx and Ralts on the pile of "scum shiftily sniffing for stuff to stir up so as to subtly scatter some sneaky suspicion on seemingly stand-up citizens"
In post 846, imaginality wrote:I don't like Gypyx and Ralts jumping on mastina's comment about the people who see TSQ v STD as TvT being more likely scum than not.
It seemed like deliberately reading the comment in the worst way.
Ralts raised it as a question whereas Gypyx continued to paint it as though mastina was calling herself scummy even after reading mastina's reply to Ralts. Which, like, I don't see why Gypyx bothers to post that as town, but as scum it is a chance to splash a bit of dirt on someone.
Well, look, got a personal theory that scum are quite more likely than town to admit they did the sussy, cuz like, obviously they
know
they aren't innocent, especially in cases where it's like "yeah doing that is bad, i know i did it but pls bear with me"
and on the question of posting it, i saw the first message, wrote it, then saw her developping on it, and even though that kinda puts it into perspetive as something widespread, still thought it was notable enuff to br pointed out
plus i took like 5 good minutes to get that gif link working so i wasn't gonna let it good to waste lmao
In post 861, Gypyx wrote:also imaginality if you could tell the difference between sharing reads and being a devilish scum drawing attention to town's scummy posts
Townread: Milobird, TSQ
Townlean: Save The Dragons,
Nulltown: Wisdom, imaginality, Whemestar, SK, firebringer
Null: T3, Alexandrite, The Goat (not sure if this one has posted), mastina, KTT, ralts
Nullscum: Dwlee99, TIL
Scumlean: chowchow, Gypyx, sirCakez
Scumread: Woolax
VOTE: Kyouku
There is no freaking way you sr me after OMB.
Thanks for scumclaiming.
~I
This is a bad reason for calling ssbm scum because without a contrasting scum game to compare with, how can she know whether you playing like OMB is a town tell or NAI?
On the other hand the Gypyx wagon gives off terrible vibes and feels like it fucking sucks, with scum latching onto it.
When I'm in a better mindset (hella tired right now, just reading to stay caught up, not really capable of good critical thinking), will be able to give that better thought.
This is an interesting callout; the only person you have south of null voting that is currently voting for Gypyx is imaginality vs. 3 who are voting for Brain Cell.
VOTE: mastina
Why didn't the Brain Cell wagon give you scum vibes when more of your scum reads are (or were, I'm not sure the current vote count) on that?
This was the accurate VC at the time of 861 as well. Gypyx and imaginality distancing while imaginality leaves an out and then votes a vanity wagon hoping both go away.
Hard pass on this being clearing.
If there’s a bus on Gypyx, Imaginality is the only possibility I can see here, since I have reasons to tr everyone else on that wagon.
In post 1077, Milobird wrote:If anything, thoughts on the BrainCell and Gypyx wagons would be great skrew.
I'm gonna reiterate up front that my top priority right now is getting to Night, so I'm willing to hop on most wagons regardless.
The Gypyx wagon was because he pointed out that mastina did the thing she said scum would also do, right? And meta stuff? I don't really care about either. Like yeah scum could jump on that mastina thing but I'm gonna need more than that to be convinced, and meta isn't it. My #1 thought on that wagon is that I hated the way imaginality hopped onto it.
The BrainCell wagon was because... what? Words vs content? Mech spec? I don't care. It's possible I missed/forgot more compelling reasoning. Unfortunately I didn't really absorb anything ssbm_Kyouko has said because my eyes were glazing over as I got to the home stretch of the catchup
He has no idea of Gypyx alignment but hates imaginality jumping on. Hmm.
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2021 6:54 am
by Titus
In post 1822, SleepyKrew wrote:Ok so ignore Ralts and The Goat because they're both completely missing. The next person is Gypyx. He's actually active elsewhere. And he never pushed Woolax
Odd here that SleepyKrew is pushing Gypyx while voting Woolax at EoD. His vote on Woolax was very resigned too.
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2021 6:56 am
by Titus
Going with null on SleepyKrew based solely on interactions with flipped scum. I still lean scum on VD but I see other points of view.
In post 846, imaginality wrote:I don't like Gypyx and Ralts jumping on mastina's comment about the people who see TSQ v STD as TvT being more likely scum than not.
It seemed like deliberately reading the comment in the worst way.
Ralts raised it as a question whereas Gypyx continued to paint it as though mastina was calling herself scummy even after reading mastina's reply to Ralts. Which, like, I don't see why Gypyx bothers to post that as town, but as scum it is a chance to splash a bit of dirt on someone.
VOTE: Gypyx
On STD v TSQ my initial take was slightly suspicious of STD and pro town on TSQ. Someone mentioned TSQ plays like that as scum also so that tempers my town read slightly but I still like his side of it. Still figuring out how I feel about the STD side of it. I didn't see the initial post as scummy but the initial reaction to TSQ's pressure did feel a bit hmmm... Like, I didn't like the retrofitting 'oh but look at the reactions I generated' part of the conversation. However there was also a hint of confused 'what are you on about'-ness to it.
Interesting also at Gypyx defended STD against TSQ early in that debate.
In post 847, imaginality wrote:Oh cool add Dwlee99 to Gypyx and Ralts on the pile of "scum shiftily sniffing for stuff to stir up so as to subtly scatter some sneaky suspicion on seemingly stand-up citizens"
In post 846, imaginality wrote:I don't like Gypyx and Ralts jumping on mastina's comment about the people who see TSQ v STD as TvT being more likely scum than not.
It seemed like deliberately reading the comment in the worst way.
Ralts raised it as a question whereas Gypyx continued to paint it as though mastina was calling herself scummy even after reading mastina's reply to Ralts. Which, like, I don't see why Gypyx bothers to post that as town, but as scum it is a chance to splash a bit of dirt on someone.
Well, look, got a personal theory that scum are quite more likely than town to admit they did the sussy, cuz like, obviously they
know
they aren't innocent, especially in cases where it's like "yeah doing that is bad, i know i did it but pls bear with me"
and on the question of posting it, i saw the first message, wrote it, then saw her developping on it, and even though that kinda puts it into perspetive as something widespread, still thought it was notable enuff to br pointed out
plus i took like 5 good minutes to get that gif link working so i wasn't gonna let it good to waste lmao
In post 861, Gypyx wrote:also imaginality if you could tell the difference between sharing reads and being a devilish scum drawing attention to town's scummy posts
Townread: Milobird, TSQ
Townlean: Save The Dragons,
Nulltown: Wisdom, imaginality, Whemestar, SK, firebringer
Null: T3, Alexandrite, The Goat (not sure if this one has posted), mastina, KTT, ralts
Nullscum: Dwlee99, TIL
Scumlean: chowchow, Gypyx, sirCakez
Scumread: Woolax
VOTE: Kyouku
There is no freaking way you sr me after OMB.
Thanks for scumclaiming.
~I
This is a bad reason for calling ssbm scum because without a contrasting scum game to compare with, how can she know whether you playing like OMB is a town tell or NAI?
On the other hand the Gypyx wagon gives off terrible vibes and feels like it fucking sucks, with scum latching onto it.
When I'm in a better mindset (hella tired right now, just reading to stay caught up, not really capable of good critical thinking), will be able to give that better thought.
This is an interesting callout; the only person you have south of null voting that is currently voting for Gypyx is imaginality vs. 3 who are voting for Brain Cell.
VOTE: mastina
Why didn't the Brain Cell wagon give you scum vibes when more of your scum reads are (or were, I'm not sure the current vote count) on that?
I could switch to this. Imaginality looks to be contradicting himself on Gypyx read.
VOTE: Imaginality
Not tr T3 either but these contradictions look alot like distancing.
~I
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2021 7:03 am
by Titus
VOTE: imaginality
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2021 7:05 am
by Titus
Wisdom, can you state why you thought interactions between gypyx SleepyKrew and imaginality were clearing?
In post 1077, Milobird wrote:If anything, thoughts on the BrainCell and Gypyx wagons would be great skrew.
I'm gonna reiterate up front that my top priority right now is getting to Night, so I'm willing to hop on most wagons regardless.
The Gypyx wagon was because he pointed out that mastina did the thing she said scum would also do, right? And meta stuff? I don't really care about either. Like yeah scum could jump on that mastina thing but I'm gonna need more than that to be convinced, and meta isn't it. My #1 thought on that wagon is that I hated the way imaginality hopped onto it.
The BrainCell wagon was because... what? Words vs content? Mech spec? I don't care. It's possible I missed/forgot more compelling reasoning. Unfortunately I didn't really absorb anything ssbm_Kyouko has said because my eyes were glazing over as I got to the home stretch of the catchup
He has no idea of Gypyx alignment but hates imaginality jumping on. Hmm.
In post 1822, SleepyKrew wrote:Ok so ignore Ralts and The Goat because they're both completely missing. The next person is Gypyx. He's actually active elsewhere. And he never pushed Woolax
Odd here that SleepyKrew is pushing Gypyx while voting Woolax at EoD. His vote on Woolax was very resigned too.
I did a metadive on Skrew, couldn’t find any recent scumgames but I couldn’t find any examples in the games I did check of them calling anyone “lockscum”, which they did to both me and Fire. Also, the excessive grumpiness was also not present in those games.
Is it just me, or does anyone else think Kyouku was an odd kill?
~I
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2021 7:34 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 2910, Titus wrote:My guess is imaginality VD and mastina but I may just be omgusing.
nah I buy mastina's role stuff making her town, though her push on me is funny for indescribable reasons
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2021 7:35 am
by Truth Innuendos Lies
In post 2468, Truth Innuendos Lies wrote:Can someone ISO Gypyx and tell if if you think their interactions with Imaginality and T3 seems kind’ve awkward or am I reading too much into that?
~I
@T3, when are you going to address the votes on you?
Nope. I'm happy sticking with this. Active in the game but almost completely contentless. Not really committing to any reads or anything, just kinda there.
The Whemestar interaction around the Mareep claim is the most signal we've gotten out of their noise, but I don't think it's alignment indicative. (I did get a good laugh out of "I'm mareep, you dolt" though. Kudos.)
1) Rich, coming from the slot that went "writing 400 posts about whether an anonymous hydra does or does not contain a particular player is a good use of my time".
2) Have you seen the way Quinn talks normally? They either blather on for 40 pages or they post a one-liner. It's what they do.
I think TIL is town, despite my annoyance at their question (and honestly wishing I thought the chowchow fixation made them scum because that's also annoying), but there's gotta be at least two scum on our wagon now just by like... math.
With that in mind, my reads on this:
Sharing the Brain Cell (6): SirCakez, Firebringer, Whemestar, Wisdom, Gypyx, Truth innuendos Lies
Would be happy to vote either Whemestar or Gypyx if those wagons pick up/the STD one dies.
I'll also say it's frustrating that even the people I think are town on our wagon don't really have any reasoning behind their votes and aren't trying to ask us questions or etc. in order to assess their read further? I feel like we've given plenty of feedback on what STD has done that reads scummy to us, and plenty of reads in general, and it's frustrating to have that reciprocated. There's no case (and therefore nothing to respond to), it's mostly just people not vibing with our tone. To which I say: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ We're both neurodivergent. Deal with it.
- B.
PEDIT: T3 is a leanscum too but I think my confidence goes STD >> Whemestar >>>>> Gypyx >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> T3.
Interesting that Brain was hard sr Gypyx and this makes me think Skrew’s ellitelling comment wrt Gypyx isn’t clearing.
Also possible, scum wanted to make Wheme look bad but idk.
~I
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2021 7:53 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 340, Gypyx wrote:so uh T3 apart not liking 122 from milo, anything more concrete from your catchup?
doing ctrl-f stuff in gypyx's ISO, for T3, I don't think this is a great sign for him, could be trying to push a buddy along a bit
that's basically the only substantial thing I saw from gypyx on T3
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2021 7:54 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 861, Gypyx wrote:also imaginality if you could tell the difference between sharing reads and being a devilish scum drawing attention to town's scummy posts
similar situation in this post
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2021 7:54 am
by PookyTheMagicalBear
In post 2942, DkKoba wrote:i thought ive seen the worst take of the day already.
We managed to pass that.
I expect to be called scum any second now
scum koba rh
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2021 7:55 am
by Truth Innuendos Lies
In post 2942, DkKoba wrote:i thought ive seen the worst take of the day already.
We managed to pass that.
I expect to be called scum any second now
Which one, Gamma or Titus? It’s real toss up but based off of Gamma being scum cw, I’d go with that.
Wisdom not seeing how bleeding obvtown Titus is here is worrying me a bit. It’s obviously not for Mastina because she wrongly sr her in Stumps.
In post 340, Gypyx wrote:so uh T3 apart not liking 122 from milo, anything more concrete from your catchup?
doing ctrl-f stuff in gypyx's ISO, for T3, I don't think this is a great sign for him, could be trying to push a buddy along a bit
that's basically the only substantial thing I saw from gypyx on T3
I could switch back to T3.
VOTE: T3
I think they’re both > rand chance of being Gypyx buddies but interactions look the worst for T3.
In post 861, Gypyx wrote:also imaginality if you could tell the difference between sharing reads and being a devilish scum drawing attention to town's scummy posts
similar situation in this post
+1
Yep, yep.
My current solve: Woolax/Gypyx/T3/Imaginality and maybe Valkyrie? Dwelee’s not off the table. Slightly worried about Wisdom if this is true but the Titus read concerns me more then anything but don’t want to worry about Wisdom yet, due to Gamma read.
