Mafiascum.net

We should have nonconsensus slots claim and then PRs can cc them if they’re lying. I don’t see how that’s not the best outcome for town? Don’t put tprs in possible danger and only if nonconsensus trs lie, then cc.

In post 2925, Harley Quinn wrote:We should have nonconsensus slots claim and then PRs can cc them if they’re lying. I don’t see how that’s not the best outcome for town? Don’t put tprs in possible danger and only if nonconsensus trs lie, then cc.

Nah everyone or no one

Consensus list is no one atm.

Consensus would just be people who screamed the loudest

In post 2925, Harley Quinn wrote:We should have nonconsensus slots claim and then PRs can cc them if they’re lying. I don’t see how that’s not the best outcome for town? Don’t put tprs in possible danger and only if nonconsensus trs lie, then cc.

Because this way eliminates scum in "consensus TRs". Scum are informed.

I spent a lot of time on this. If you trust me, trust my mechanics.

I don’t think we should help scum to know where to shoot.

In post 2928, Harley Quinn wrote:I don’t think we should help scum to know where to shoot.

I understand that but we already have 2 high value TPRs on the table. I suspect, we have at least one more. There's too many "high value" targets.

In post 2925, Harley Quinn wrote:We should have nonconsensus slots claim and then PRs can cc them if they’re lying. I don’t see how that’s not the best outcome for town? Don’t put tprs in possible danger and only if nonconsensus trs lie, then cc.

So what’s wrong with this idea then? It helps sort the nonconsensus trs but doesn’t put possible consensus tprs at risk. If scum can’t tell apart the consensus vts from the consensus tprs then in what world does this not make sense?

outting doctor is a terrible idea with a claimed jker

In post 2930, Harley Quinn wrote:

In post 2925, Harley Quinn wrote:We should have nonconsensus slots claim and then PRs can cc them if they’re lying. I don’t see how that’s not the best outcome for town? Don’t put tprs in possible danger and only if nonconsensus trs lie, then cc.

So what’s wrong with this idea then? It helps sort the nonconsensus trs but doesn’t put possible consensus tprs at risk. If scum can’t tell apart the consensus vts from the consensus tprs then in what world does this not make sense?

I don't even follow what you're saying.

Where intel that i am vengeful fakeclaiming comed from?

In post 2930, Harley Quinn wrote:

In post 2925, Harley Quinn wrote:We should have nonconsensus slots claim and then PRs can cc them if they’re lying. I don’t see how that’s not the best outcome for town? Don’t put tprs in possible danger and only if nonconsensus trs lie, then cc.

So what’s wrong with this idea then? It helps sort the nonconsensus trs but doesn’t put possible consensus tprs at risk. If scum can’t tell apart the consensus vts from the consensus tprs then in what world does this not make sense?

“Consensus” is not defined for starters

Ari is TR’d by all but Titus and maybe Gamma
I scumread Titus but am “working with” her

Some people SR me and some people TR me

Finding consensus town just puts a target on their back if right

Like ??

No nebulous terms all or none

night 3 vigilante or vengeful
1-shot vigilante or 2-shot PGO (active)
ascetic cop or bulletproof
draft cop or 1-shot watcher
doctor or roleblocker
universal backup or rolecop
neighborizer or voyeur
jailkeeper or tracker

I personally have no problem claiming but they’re are categories like the one with a possible doc in it for example that scum would likely shoot over any of the current high value claims.

If a consensus tr were to either claim doc or doc or rolecop pairing for example, why wouldn’t scum shoot them ovrr voyeur, jk or bp?

That’s why Ari is right about this and you both are wrong.

In post 2935, Harley Quinn wrote:night 3 vigilante or vengeful
1-shot vigilante or 2-shot PGO (active)
ascetic cop or bulletproof
draft cop or 1-shot watcher
doctor or roleblocker
universal backup or rolecop
neighborizer or voyeur
jailkeeper or tracker

I personally have no problem claiming but they’re are categories like the one with a possible doc in it for example that scum would likely shoot over any of the current high value claims.

If a consensus tr were to either claim doc or doc or rolecop pairing for example, why wouldn’t scum shoot them ovrr voyeur, jk or bp?

That’s why Ari is right about this and you both are wrong.

Then vote no one and we don’t mass claim

This half and half is sus as fuck

In post 2931, Aristeia wrote:outting doctor is a terrible idea with a claimed jker

+1

For all we know, maybe neither doc or rolecop even exist but what if there is one? Well we’ve just in essence put a bounty on their head even if they only claim the category. Does anyone seriously think that if that category even exists and is town, scum won’t shoot there first?

yeah if we're massclaiming we should massclaim... if not we shouldn't. This is why I wanted to wait for more consensus. I guess trying to get any real consensus on anything at all in this town is like asking a giraffe to do algebra though

In post 2936, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2935, Harley Quinn wrote:night 3 vigilante or vengeful
1-shot vigilante or 2-shot PGO (active)
ascetic cop or bulletproof
draft cop or 1-shot watcher
doctor or roleblocker
universal backup or rolecop
neighborizer or voyeur
jailkeeper or tracker

I personally have no problem claiming but they’re are categories like the one with a possible doc in it for example that scum would likely shoot over any of the current high value claims.

If a consensus tr were to either claim doc or doc or rolecop pairing for example, why wouldn’t scum shoot them ovrr voyeur, jk or bp?

That’s why Ari is right about this and you both are wrong.

Then vote no one and we don’t mass claim

This half and half is sus as fuck

No offence but that clearly went right over your head then.

In post 2938, implosion wrote:yeah if we're massclaiming we should massclaim... if not we shouldn't. This is why I wanted to wait for more consensus. I guess trying to get any real consensus on anything at all in this town is like asking a giraffe to do algebra though

I support the giraffe doing algebra 100%.

In post 2937, Harley Quinn wrote:

In post 2931, Aristeia wrote:outting doctor is a terrible idea with a claimed jker

+1

For all we know, maybe neither doc or rolecop even exist but what if there is one? Well we’ve just in essence put a bounty on their head even if they only claim the category. Does anyone seriously think that if that category even exists and is town, scum won’t shoot there first?

Guess what, if that happens, we get more info and the moment we lim a second scum, it turns Ausuka into a cop. Asuka is much more powerful than a doc and can just heal Auska.

If there is no doctor, then we know that Math can only be town if Enchant is town.

In post 2938, implosion wrote:yeah if we're massclaiming we should massclaim... if not we shouldn't. This is why I wanted to wait for more consensus. I guess trying to get any real consensus on anything at all in this town is like asking a giraffe to do algebra though

I don’t even understand why it’s necessary unless someone is lying and it doesn’t look like any pr claims aren’t legit.

Titus, is there any way I can work with you to stop wanting to lim me? Because that is, Bad for the game that you want to do that. And I don't really understand how to work with you.

There should't be any massclaim now.

Calm.

In post 2942, Harley Quinn wrote:

In post 2938, implosion wrote:yeah if we're massclaiming we should massclaim... if not we shouldn't. This is why I wanted to wait for more consensus. I guess trying to get any real consensus on anything at all in this town is like asking a giraffe to do algebra though

I don’t even understand why it’s necessary unless someone is lying and it doesn’t look like any pr claims aren’t legit.

That's precisely why we are massclaiming. The PR claims on the table means about half of the town is already claimed.

We get knowledge from if a doctor exists or doesn't.

Mechanics and votes are what I do. Please trust me.

In post 2945, Titus wrote:

In post 2942, Harley Quinn wrote:

In post 2938, implosion wrote:yeah if we're massclaiming we should massclaim... if not we shouldn't. This is why I wanted to wait for more consensus. I guess trying to get any real consensus on anything at all in this town is like asking a giraffe to do algebra though

I don’t even understand why it’s necessary unless someone is lying and it doesn’t look like any pr claims aren’t legit.

That's precisely why we are massclaiming. The PR claims on the table means about half of the town is already claimed.

We get knowledge from if a doctor exists or doesn't.

Mechanics and votes are what I do. Please trust me.

I don’t.

I would rather be elimmed than follow your plan.

This is literally beyond frustrating. I am outvoted but this is totally gamebreaking if we massclaimed my way.

another thing

if we lim enchant and he is scum ascetic cop then universal backup if it exists becomes ascetic cop and scum have no idea where ub is

In post 2947, Titus wrote:This is literally beyond frustrating. I am outvoted but this is totally gamebreaking if we massclaimed my way.

You can get my vote if you explain why we need to claim.