Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2022 7:25 pm
Hmm
That’s not my experience playing with her but that’s irrelevant to this game.In post 2916, Bell wrote:I've been playing with Andante lately and you wouldn't believe the stuff they say other people say when they didn't.In post 2910, MathBlade wrote:?? I am sorry I don’t follow. Can you restate this?In post 2904, Bell wrote:You're protecting them when this entire time they could have circumvented their own restriction by sharing what they had in their PT.In post 2901, MathBlade wrote:It’s more they have had spicy reads and been open and communicative. I have played with both heads before and one of the heads (imho) tends not to effort. I kinda don’t want to share their spicy reads without permission but I don’t see scum saying some things.In post 2891, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:can you explain how you got to this townread of them?In post 2886, MathBlade wrote:Why not? Anything goes in a bastard game. DNA seems pretty Townie. I know no one else can see it but I think they’re town.
Corwin also seemed to have dropped the suspicion so I'm going to assume they either disagreed with IRcher/RH's take or you're lying about their takes.
If I lie about any takes I would just be counter claimed and C&G just says “I never said that”
Then I get turbo yeeted
I don’t lie about what C&G says even if you incorrectly think I am scum.
You're a different type of unbelievable.
Spiteful town.In post 2928, Rad wrote:Bell the mb read was really on corwin. How did you read corwin?
Not exactly lying about what other people have said, but I know of at least 3 games in which Andante faked investigative results as town.In post 2926, Dancing Puppets wrote:That’s not my experience playing with her but that’s irrelevant to this game.In post 2916, Bell wrote:I've been playing with Andante lately and you wouldn't believe the stuff they say other people say when they didn't.In post 2910, MathBlade wrote:?? I am sorry I don’t follow. Can you restate this?In post 2904, Bell wrote:You're protecting them when this entire time they could have circumvented their own restriction by sharing what they had in their PT.In post 2901, MathBlade wrote:It’s more they have had spicy reads and been open and communicative. I have played with both heads before and one of the heads (imho) tends not to effort. I kinda don’t want to share their spicy reads without permission but I don’t see scum saying some things.In post 2891, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:can you explain how you got to this townread of them?In post 2886, MathBlade wrote:Why not? Anything goes in a bastard game. DNA seems pretty Townie. I know no one else can see it but I think they’re town.
Corwin also seemed to have dropped the suspicion so I'm going to assume they either disagreed with IRcher/RH's take or you're lying about their takes.
If I lie about any takes I would just be counter claimed and C&G just says “I never said that”
Then I get turbo yeeted
I don’t lie about what C&G says even if you incorrectly think I am scum.
You're a different type of unbelievable.
I literally said that was C&G’s read and I was willing to sheep it?In post 2924, Bell wrote:Mathblade is my most apathetic read. They scum read me every game and I argue with them every game. You can step back and just let a mob kill them though. It happens about 50% of the time due to inundation.In post 2919, Lukewarm wrote:I was trying to kill mathbladeIn post 2918, Bell wrote:
You were trying to lead?
Just point out who you want to die and I'll back you unthinkingly.
This feels like you missed the fact that I just said that I think he is town nowIn post 2929, Bell wrote:All you have to do is not get in their way or defend them.
and you'll need to shove Titus out of the way early, but it's manageable because of their low activity and their long history of incorrectly reading Mathblade if you want to challenge them.
It’s easier on my phone lolIn post 2932, Cephrir wrote:you all know that DNA isn't shorter than C&G right
Okay... DADIn post 2933, Cephrir wrote:go to bed lukewarm
Yeah I just got that.In post 2935, Lukewarm wrote:This feels like you missed the fact that I just said that I think he is town nowIn post 2929, Bell wrote:All you have to do is not get in their way or defend them.
and you'll need to shove Titus out of the way early, but it's manageable because of their low activity and their long history of incorrectly reading Mathblade if you want to challenge them.
It's not even your read and it's still wrong.In post 2934, MathBlade wrote:I literally said that was C&G’s read and I was willing to sheep it?In post 2924, Bell wrote:Mathblade is my most apathetic read. They scum read me every game and I argue with them every game. You can step back and just let a mob kill them though. It happens about 50% of the time due to inundation.In post 2919, Lukewarm wrote:I was trying to kill mathbladeIn post 2918, Bell wrote:
You were trying to lead?
Just point out who you want to die and I'll back you unthinkingly.
i guess we disagree about what clear evidence isIn post 2922, Dancing Puppets wrote:To anyone who has meta on me but I also think my play here has been extremely protown. No one currently sr me has probably even looked at my scumgames and Penguin claims not to remember.
To clarify, similar to the clarification about my opening post about looking for my dad.
Because of your sudden “intuition”? Based on what? You keep saying this bs about not ignoring your intuition anymore but this apparently epiphany only happened after bird made a bad read on me, so yeah I find that pretty suss.In post 2920, Rad wrote:Lol. What 180? Null to scum is a 90. <3In post 2912, Dancing Puppets wrote:RAD’s 180 on me looks the worst
This is how tired I am, I thought they were referring to 180In post 2920, Rad wrote:Lol. What 180? Null to scum is a 90. <3In post 2912, Dancing Puppets wrote:RAD’s 180 on me looks the worst
It’s not just meta, I think my play has been very obviously protown, so the only reason it looks as to why I’m suddenly being sr is that I didn’t have a chill reaction to bird’s scumread on me because I seriously would expect him to not seriously be this horrible at reading me.In post 2941, Cephrir wrote:i guess we disagree about what clear evidence isIn post 2922, Dancing Puppets wrote:To anyone who has meta on me but I also think my play here has been extremely protown. No one currently sr me has probably even looked at my scumgames and Penguin claims not to remember.
fwiw i think the extent of your reliance on meta is quite extreme; not that that is a bad thing, but i don't think it's fair to expect everyone else to also play from a meta-first viewpoint