Page 119 of 235

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 2:40 pm
by Nachomamma8
In post 2946, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:why would you bring it up before then
literally no idea what you're saying then.

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 2:42 pm
by BeautyAndTheBeast
In post 2949, Nachomamma8 wrote:bro has been at leaning scum ever since his exchange with you.
more town =/= town.
okay then why is he your 4th scumread

and you said "probably scum" which kind of says you think he is scum yeah?

not a town read

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 2:43 pm
by BeautyAndTheBeast
In post 2945, notscience wrote:Majiffy what do you think of doing with nacho
It involves scented candles, baby oil, and a light dimmer.
In post 2949, Nachomamma8 wrote:more town =/= town.
Mollie.

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 2:44 pm
by Venmar
In post 2941, Venmar wrote:aTed? whats that
In post 2941, Venmar wrote:aTed? whats that
In post 2941, Venmar wrote:aTed? whats that
In post 2941, Venmar wrote:aTed? whats that
In post 2941, Venmar wrote:aTed? whats that
In post 2941, Venmar wrote:aTed? whats that
In post 2941, Venmar wrote:aTed? whats that
In post 2941, Venmar wrote:aTed? whats that
In post 2941, Venmar wrote:aTed? whats that
In post 2941, Venmar wrote:aTed? whats that
In post 2941, Venmar wrote:aTed? whats that
In post 2941, Venmar wrote:aTed? whats that
In post 2941, Venmar wrote:aTed? whats that
In post 2941, Venmar wrote:aTed? whats that
In post 2941, Venmar wrote:aTed? whats that

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 2:44 pm
by Nachomamma8
appeal to emotion

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 2:44 pm
by Venmar
i didnt do that though

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 2:45 pm
by BeautyAndTheBeast
it comes down to you trying to hedge your read on bro and I am just trying to understand why.

@ venny

sorry. appeal to emotions

eta: you did

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 2:48 pm
by BeautyAndTheBeast
How about we discuss the fact that we have all the support we need to lynch Nick AND THIS WAGON STILL ISN'T GETTING OFF THE GROUND.

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 2:53 pm
by Nachomamma8
In post 2956, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:it comes down to you trying to hedge your read on bro and I am just trying to understand why.
I am looking at BRO, I am sorting BRO. I don't trust ffery's read on BRO that much, and while I also have a bit of a scumread on him it's easily the weakest of my scumreads at the moment.

I'm surprised you didn't even flinch at Mala scumread though. Do you agree with it?

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 3:06 pm
by BeautyAndTheBeast
In post 2958, Nachomamma8 wrote:
In post 2956, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:it comes down to you trying to hedge your read on bro and I am just trying to understand why.
I am looking at BRO, I am sorting BRO.
I don't trust ffery's read on BRO that much
, and while I also have a bit of a scumread on him it's easily the weakest of my scumreads at the moment.

I'm surprised you didn't even flinch at Mala scumread though. Do you agree with it?
okay, so why do you not trust your own read that much? cos he did something townie and then...in the space where he did not post again, you moved him back to "probably" scum but will push a nicky lynch through?

that is what does not make sense.

are you asking me if I think mala is scum?

I don't know. she is unsure for me.

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 3:11 pm
by notscience
VOTE: nick

Everyone not voting nick in their next post is scumclaiming

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 3:13 pm
by zMuffinMan
not voting nick

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 3:13 pm
by notscience
There's one scumbuddy

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 3:14 pm
by Nachomamma8
In post 2959, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:okay, so why do you not trust your own read that much?
I do. My own read is not that strong.
In post 2959, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:you moved him back to "probably" scum but will push a nicky lynch through?
I moved him from scum to probably scum when I backed off. He is still in the probably scum slot.

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 3:15 pm
by zMuffinMan
In post 2962, notscience wrote:There's one scumbuddy
ur reads r good

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 3:18 pm
by BeautyAndTheBeast
In post 2963, Nachomamma8 wrote:
In post 2959, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:okay, so why do you not trust your own read that much?
I do. My own read is not that strong.
In post 2959, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:you moved him back to "probably" scum but will push a nicky lynch through?
I moved him from scum to probably scum when I backed off. He is still in the probably scum slot.
but you said he was he was town telling

what made you move from thinking he was town telling to "probably scum".

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 3:20 pm
by zMuffinMan
is the one post i'm trying to figure out now and is the only interaction with rach that looked like possible scum-scum interaction.

the rest of it looked town. especially the stuff towards the end of d1. e.g. and do not make a lot of sense if nick is scum with rach.

also i'm reading the posts today from him as town who genuinely thinks people are shit at reading him (or scum calling him scum). there are also other parts of his iso that look town (i went over this d1)

i don't think his play has been good, but i don't currently think he's scum.

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 3:20 pm
by Nachomamma8
In post 2749, Nachomamma8 wrote:i don't have time right now but i'm reading bro as sort of more town than before now, please leave him alone for a little while.
this is all i said about bro being town.
this is it.

sort of more town than before now =/= town.

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 3:22 pm
by Venmar
In post 2956, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:eta: you did
wasnt my intention if i did, but i dont think i did

majiffy vote nacho with mollie like she wanted

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 3:22 pm
by Nachomamma8
In post 2966, zMuffinMan wrote:e.g. 2345 and 2374 do not make a lot of sense if nick is scum with rach.
how did he end up voting mastin at the end of the day?

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 3:23 pm
by zMuffinMan
because rm was lynched before he came back. he said something about being back in 7.5 hours in

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 3:26 pm
by BeautyAndTheBeast
we are sticking with our nicky vote

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 3:30 pm
by Nachomamma8
In post 2970, zMuffinMan wrote:because rm was lynched before he came back. he said something about being back in 7.5 hours in
ah.

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 3:32 pm
by BeautyAndTheBeast
In post 2961, zMuffinMan wrote:not voting nick
Muffin, do me a favor.

Look at this wagon:
BROseidon, Trust Fund, mastin2, Ghostlin, zMuffinMan, Aj, Andy, Nacho, BaTB, NS

How many of these people are in your scum reads?
Wait, let me answer that for you: 1

ONE PERSON. OUT OF TEN.

We have
all
the support we need to lynch a person
on your scum list.


y u no vote? Hm?
In post 2966, zMuffinMan wrote:i don't currently think he's scum.
Image

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 3:37 pm
by zMuffinMan
bnb wrote:BROseidon, Trust Fund, mastin2, Ghostlin, zMuffinMan, Aj, Andy, Nacho, BaTB, NS
How many of these people are in your scum reads?
2, with a maybe on a 3rd, and i'm also reconsidering my reads on the rest.

i still think bro is scum, but i realise i probably can't get him lynched today

i'm not as fond of trust fund as others seem to be

and the only reason i'm not avidly defending nick right now is because i'm not completely sure he's town.

what i'm still trying to figure out is why the nick wagon stalled d1 when it was competing with the rm wagon (i have a couple theories regarding this, but they require me being wrong about a couple of my town reads) and whether the interactions with rm makes sense as scum-scum interactions (i'm currently thinking no)