In post 2936, davesaz wrote:Your voyeur claim is fake. I don't believe that anyone can be that bad a player to use the role in that way. That's not what you do. Saying it was to "protect" carcalilly by making scum think there is a doctor doesn't hold water. You backtracked when you found out that what you claimed was impossible, and nobody seems to care that the thing you backtracked from was blatantly
not what that role should do
.
As much as I'd love for this to be true, I think this is town!Garmr. From what I can gather looking at his meta, town!Garmr does stupid shit like this all the time.
Not all the time about 35% of the time I will try to something to spice the game up. if I did it all the time people would be easily able to point out my scum game.
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2019 3:17 am
by Garmr
I'm starting to not feel anxious about Titus but I don't know why.
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2019 3:17 am
by Garmr
In post 2953, Garmr wrote:I'm starting to feel anxious about Titus but I don't know why.
Fixed *
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2019 4:38 am
by Judge Joseph Dredd
Oh, a wagon on me (of only 2 votes, mind you)
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2019 4:40 am
by Judge Joseph Dredd
May I request that scum hop on my wagon please? It would make it easier for me to sort as opposed to steering away and let the town try to push a mislynch that's not going to happen
I vote alonzo, he claims that I only did so because he was trying to sort me?
He votes bob with no reasoning given, right after bob was trying to sort him?
Then he OMGUS votes profii?
Am I missing something?
The scum mostly
This is funny. Over defensive though.
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2019 6:13 am
by texcat
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2019 6:20 am
by Judge Joseph Dredd
@NOT MOD: You missed profii's vote on Alonzo in 2925 which I sheeped
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2019 6:37 am
by Hopkirk
In post 2956, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:May I request that scum hop on my wagon please? It would make it easier for me to sort as opposed to steering away and let the town try to push a mislynch that's not going to happen
Can you people stop using 'Hop' as a negative term.
How do the automated vote counters work. Can anyone add them?
Why wouldn't there be? Did Eevee do something to change their minds? I'm still willing to
hop
er, jump back on her. And I noticed while doing the VCs that she has never voted toDay.
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2019 7:26 am
by Judge Joseph Dredd
In post 2960, Hopkirk wrote:Can you people stop using 'Hop' as a negative term.
Things to do:
- I think of a negative idea
- I try to express my negative idea
- I manage to post my negative idea
- Something goes wrong and my post ends up with only one word of 3 letters: h-o-p
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2019 7:28 am
by Hopkirk
I can't think of a single sentence, opinion, or action I'm 100% sure came from Eevee.
Is it a policy lynch?
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2019 7:34 am
by profii
In post 2953, Garmr wrote:I'm starting to not feel anxious about Titus but I don't know why.
I can dig this. Theres a few posts that are a bit like "this post could be scummy, but might not be"
As in, I need to manufacture a reason to vote here, but also need to backtrack later
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2019 7:52 am
by Rick Dalton
In post 2964, Hopkirk wrote:I can't think of a single sentence, opinion, or action I'm 100% sure came from Eevee.
Is it a policy lynch?
Nah, not at all. It was a while ago at this point, but there’s even overly solid cases on her back always.
When Eevee flips red, this needs to be looked into
