Mafiascum.net

In post 2943, Nahdia wrote:

In post 2934, Tammy wrote:

In post 2932, midwaybear wrote:Tammy, I don't think that is Nahdia's concern.

Do you see something other than ds is using the faulty logic of “I can read Nahdia” when the facts prove that that’s an erroneous claim?

my issue here is less that he's falsely claiming he can read me and more the idea that 275 was a scummy throwaway post. my point is that DS' claim of being able to read me is so removed from reality that i dont think town DS would believe it. my theory is that it's just something scum!DS said as a throwaway line, and now got caught in a web of lies trying to back it up.

In post 147, FakeGod wrote:

1. Game name
   - Smoke-Filled Antechamber
   
2. Flavor
   - Original
   
3. Number of players
   - 17
   
4. Are hydras allowed (Yes/No)
   - No
   
5. Your modding experience
   - A warlock, a werewolf, and a vampire...
   
6. Current modding commitments
   - None
   
7. Reviewers
   - None
   
8. Reviewers agreed to FINAL version? (Yes/No)
   - Not needed
   
9. Backup or co-mod
   - GuyInFreezer
   
10. Backup or co-mod's experience
    - Many including multiple Large Theme games
    
11. Backup or co-mod's commitments
    - Large Theme
    
12. Is it possible your game has any of the following: cults, mid-game alignment changes, moderator lies that cannot be reasonably anticipated (for example, Godfather, Tailor, Miller, Ninja, and mechanics like that are generally fine. Telling someone they are a reflexive doctor when they're actually a PGO is not), secret win conditions, un-divulged non-randomness in player role/alignment generation, direct moderator influence during the game? (Yes/No)
    - No

In post 2920, Nahdia wrote:there is in fact no evidence DS has provided that he has any ability to read me well

In post 2920, Nahdia wrote:can one or more of the conftowns please tell me if this is something? or am i just wasting my time here?

In post 2917, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 2914, Nahdia wrote:am i being unreasonable here? i really dont think i am!!!

What exactly are you arguing?

ill quote the whole exchange and then try to summarize:

Spoiler: quotes snipped for relevancy/redundancy

In post 275, DiamondSentinel wrote:Ooh a pagetop.

Anyways, I'm mostly just gonna go to the backline until Nahdia posts more. I can read them fairly well.

In post 2556, Nahdia wrote:i'd really like DS to answer this question which is a response to post 275.

DS, can you elaborate a bit on you feeling like you have good insight into my alignment? How do you approach reading me in particular?

In post 2640, DiamondSentinel wrote:Ultimately my reads are perpetually feels based. I think that the "logic" that so often permeates this site is a facade to hide behind and try to make this game seem like it's any more than just a dartboard until someone gets flustered.

As such, I just look at people until I get a gut read on them and then I push them. You are one such person I can get a decent gut read for and feel confident about.

In post 2683, Nahdia wrote:I was hoping for a little more than this. You called me out as someone you think you can definitely get a confidant read. That suggests you feel you have a pretty reliable meta on me. Why? What's that meta based on? You don't need to go into excruciating detail if you'd rather not list all of what you feel my tells are, but what are the general things that make me easier to get a gut read for you?

In post 2845, Nahdia wrote:I don't have solid answers on anything. I just have gutreads that I go based off of and then try to scrap together weak justification to convince others that it isn't just a gutread.

In post 2860, Nahdia wrote:

In post 2849, DiamondSentinel wrote: I don't have solid answers on anything. I just have gutreads that I go based off of and then try to scrap together weak justification to convince others that it isn't just a gutread.

but you specifically called me out as someone you can read well!!!!! why!? explain yourself!

In post 2879, DiamondSentinel wrote:Because my gut reads are pretty accurate, especially against you. See: Soccer Spirits. (And before you point it out, yes, I was scum, but it was multiball)

In post 2902, Nahdia wrote:so... one game. from four years ago. in which you were scum.

In post 1326, DiamondSentinel wrote:-snip-

in this post you point out you've changed a lot in three years. i'm still a bit baffled at 275 despite this exchange.

In post 2903, Nahdia wrote:like, yall, to drive this point home,

this

is Soccer Spirits mafia. it is one of my first non-newbie games ever on the site: notice it starts like 3 weeks after my join date. THAT'S your basis for feeling like you can gut read me well!? for getting peeved that i wasnt posting more because you could were so certain to read me right?????????

In post 2904, Nahdia wrote:and actually, while you were mafia in that game, you were red mafia. meaning you didn't know for sure it was multiball, though you did speculate there was 3p in the scumthread.

WAIT HOLD ON. YOU SCUMREAD ME THAT GAME.

your read on me THAT game was "nahdia is a noob that is posting a lot but it's all filler so i cant read them". and then you decided i was scum!

the overall point im driving here is that i think DS' original post, 275 is unsubstantiated filler. there is in fact no evidence DS has provided that he has any ability to read me well, so the idea that town!DS would make that post feels less likely to me.

In post 2954, Alisae wrote:Tammy what do you think of Diamond's response to the mason claims

In post 2957, Nahdia wrote:i mean... i cant speak to what he thinks. but my disagreement with that statement is actually the basis of what im pushing actually. but oh well.

In post 2962, Gamma Emerald wrote:Ali's never gonna answert my question is e

In post 2921, Alisae wrote:Nahdia, you know how mafia players pretend like they know whats going on in the game completely but they actually don't?

In post 2923, DiamondSentinel wrote:

In post 2919, Alisae wrote:

@Diamond

- what reads do you even have?

Big Dethy Room in the Sky - Locktown. Not allowed to touch those (as much as I'd love to, pertaining to Jake. Speaking of which, where's Jake? I just realized I've not been filled with seething annoyance for too long)
Bell - Null!Scum. Had a couple things here and there that I do not care much for.
Cabd - Scum. My gut has only gotten worse since the whole fiasco on day 1. Although there was something about a mason above? With a dethy, I don't believe that the set-up would have both a dethy and masons. Still, can someone explain later?
midwaybear - Null!town. I'm apprehensive about how readily he's agreeing with me, but I can't point to anything more worrisome.
Cakez - Null. Not a null in a "I can't read him", but a null in "it can go either way". Some stuff I really like, but his interactions with the dethy and a couple others. have been.... interesting.
S_S - Surprisingly null!town. one of my stronger towns, but I'm not putting anyone in actual town because that tier is reserved for haha funny dethy-land.
Alisae - Null. Don't like your fixation on me, but I can't scumread you for that. You're doing your job. Some stuff has rubbed me the wrong way, but hey, that applies to most.
peta - null (slight town leanings, but not null!town). Constant dry humor doesn't off-put me here, so that's good, but other than that, I've seen some things that make me scratch my head. Specifically that their iso is almost entirely questions with a couple of observations. Not much that they've personally postulated. Nothing worrisome, but I keep them on my mind.
Pooky - /shrug. Don't remember them posting aside from snarking and the D1 cringeRP.
Bulge - /shrug. This is what sparked this.
Gamma - I... wish I had more. I haven't gained much on them, but this is really my last

true

gut read. Something doesn't sit right with me about them. I doubt that trying to come up with justification from the thread would work because my unconscious mind is not great.
Nahdia - Still think they're scum.

In post 2933, DiamondSentinel wrote:

In post 2929, Alisae wrote:Cabd and SS are also masons

Yeah that was what I was talking about.

I don't believe that. I do not believe for a second that there is one pair of masons with the dethy, much less two.

I also don't believe that you guys are all four scum because that's stupid. What I

do

believe is that this is a super "fun" inside joke (or this game is secretly bastard).

In post 2961, Tammy wrote:My impression of his posting is that he is just posting. A lot of it doesn’t make sense. Doesn’t seem to be even following a pattern or even the game.

In post 2855, SirCakez wrote:

In post 2788, Alisae wrote:Holy shit Cakez scumpool in 2377 was Me, Nahdia, and Bulge
that is so scummy wtf????

why? you three were looking terrible at that point.

In post 2967, SirCakez wrote:

In post 2855, SirCakez wrote:

In post 2788, Alisae wrote:Holy shit Cakez scumpool in 2377 was Me, Nahdia, and Bulge
that is so scummy wtf????

why? you three were looking terrible at that point.

@Alisae response?

In post 2969, Gamma Emerald wrote:my take is either scum are trying to rile up the conftowns to get them to look elsewhere or towns are making a mistake

In post 2732, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2720, Alisae wrote:

In post 2716, Alisae wrote:Gamma actually has a lot more scum equity then I thought tbh

I think the thing I dislike the most is his positioning with his reads is what stands out to me

what does this mean

In post 2969, Gamma Emerald wrote:my take is either scum are trying to rile up the conftowns to get them to look elsewhere or towns are making a mistake