Mafiascum.net

also i started this right out the gate cause I thought I was getting POE'd and gonna be the target today. Guess I was wrong
oh well

In post 2946, Titus wrote:@Math, what do you think of my VCA even though it's out of date?

I am not sure. I only read the small bit.

I think given the flip if you’re going off pure VCa only Mastina can’t be lock town (even though I do townread her) because of nothing gamma’s slip and not voting him. I townread her by tone but this seems more like your opinion than a VCA based on facts unless something drastic happened in the spaces I haven’t read.

In post 2950, PlusJOYED wrote:also i started this right out the gate cause I thought I was getting POE'd and gonna be the target today. Guess I was wrong
oh well

You were cleared in my VCA because you lead the BH wagon and scum likely sheeped you.

In post 2951, MathBlade wrote:I think given the flip if you’re going off pure VCa only Mastina can’t be lock town (even though I do townread her) because of nothing gamma’s slip and not voting him. I townread her by tone but this seems more like your opinion than a VCA based on facts unless something drastic happened in the spaces I haven’t read.

mastina's vote was one of the turning points on Gamma's wagon I believe. You'll see in my notes that I detail each player.

So I try not to bog myself down with incorrect VCA too much as I am reading. It causes biases to slip in. I know it’s bad because of a flaw I found and as I don’t have footing I can’t really critique further.

I do remember Taylor being voted and some point then gamma later. But my memory is fried after PFT

In post 2953, Titus wrote:

In post 2951, MathBlade wrote:I think given the flip if you’re going off pure VCa only Mastina can’t be lock town (even though I do townread her) because of nothing gamma’s slip and not voting him. I townread her by tone but this seems more like your opinion than a VCA based on facts unless something drastic happened in the spaces I haven’t read.

mastina's vote was one of the turning points on Gamma's wagon I believe. You'll see in my notes that I detail each player.

I kinda need that atm because I have to work now and am far behind. I want to kinda see it and see if it matches my rough notes after I clock out

In post 2955, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2953, Titus wrote:

In post 2951, MathBlade wrote:I think given the flip if you’re going off pure VCa only Mastina can’t be lock town (even though I do townread her) because of nothing gamma’s slip and not voting him. I townread her by tone but this seems more like your opinion than a VCA based on facts unless something drastic happened in the spaces I haven’t read.

mastina's vote was one of the turning points on Gamma's wagon I believe. You'll see in my notes that I detail each player.

I kinda need that atm because I have to work now and am far behind. I want to kinda see it and see if it matches my rough notes after I clock out

Far enough. There's VCs every ten pages or so that I did by hand.

VCA isn’t that effective this early, case in point, it brings scummier for people like e who just went around that much. Especially if this is multiball. VCA is t gonna do anything more than a supplementary to a case.

Just too many holes.

which i wouldn’t be in if i were actual scum

I detected motion from Titus

In post 2959, April Ludgate wrote:I detected motion from Titus

Can we please stop outright claiming? I literally just said so above. Titus if scum is a master scum. You don’t need to give her any outs. We still hadn’t resolved the last one where someone claimed loyal/disloyal. I seriously told you how to do it.

Was typing on my wrecked iPad, so letters went missing and auto correct went weird

In post 2960, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2959, April Ludgate wrote:I detected motion from Titus

Can we please stop outright claiming? I literally just said so above. Titus if scum is a master scum. You don’t need to give her any outs. We still hadn’t resolved the last one where someone claimed loyal/disloyal. I seriously told you how to do it.

No.

I do my own thing with proven success. I already claimed yesterday too.

In post 2960, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2959, April Ludgate wrote:I detected motion from Titus

Can we please stop outright claiming? I literally just said so above. Titus if scum is a master scum. You don’t need to give her any outs. We still hadn’t resolved the last one where someone claimed loyal/disloyal. I seriously told you how to do it.

No.

I do my own thing with proven success. I already claimed yesterday too.

And I can catch master scum Titus if she is scum.

If anything, I’m the person in the game who should harness Titus if we think she is scum.

In post 2947, PlusJOYED wrote:im town and loyal or disloyal. an ascetic or rolestopper effect would change the result and I"m saying we very likely don't have that. Basically wanna force a possible scum!shelly to take a 50/50.

So this and April’s PR claim need solved while I am at work.

With the motion on Titus and how many PRs have flipped Titus mechanically has to move out of top tier read. I still want her answers but a deep scum planned bus does fit one of my theories.

Like tone wise Titus is town but I am sketched out.

If anyone else is a PR please SOFT or hold ffs

It could go either way.

I was hoping to get a no motion to eventually catch out Titus fake claiming, but I got motion.

In post 2963, April Ludgate wrote:

In post 2960, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2959, April Ludgate wrote:I detected motion from Titus

Can we please stop outright claiming? I literally just said so above. Titus if scum is a master scum. You don’t need to give her any outs. We still hadn’t resolved the last one where someone claimed loyal/disloyal. I seriously told you how to do it.

No.

I do my own thing with proven success. I already claimed yesterday too.

The problem is we can only lynch one person.

Assume for a moment you and the other player both have guilties. Then the other of you is probably dead. I get you do your own thing. I am rogue too at times with my emotions loaded but you have to consider the consequences.

In post 2966, April Ludgate wrote:It could go either way.

I was hoping to get a no motion to eventually catch out Titus fake claiming, but I got motion.

Oh I agree with checking Titus. She’s always a good check. It’s your reveal I have issues with.

Why would I be dead?

I’m Boonskiies, Math, if you’re not aware.

I’m gonna do big things.

I also don’t like Titus’ reads list like that, so I outed because yeah. Wasn’t gonna sit here with Taylor and I getting targeted like that.

This is probably townPlus. Then claiming like that, I don’t see coming from scum.

In post 2969, April Ludgate wrote:Why would I be dead?

Because if Titus is scum you would be outing her as scum and therefore nigh on locktown.

Pedit lol didn’t know. Still doesn’t change.

It’s more we’ve narrowed our execution way too far to four people and now have a lot of people not give content again. Talking outside of those four is now inherently sus because people have dropped trousers.

This makes it nigh on impossible because if I ask about Taylor so see why Titus is gungho despite my VCA saying likely exe setup victim we get into issues because Taylor can’t be the lynch mechanically from what it seems is here.