Page 119 of 305

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 10:09 am
by ulyana
In post 2947, Toogeloo wrote:Why do people think the two duelists will shoot at each other?
because the description tells us that one of them will die, so like it could be russian roulette or whatever sure, but the thing we do know is that one of them will die

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 10:11 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 2947, Toogeloo wrote:Why do people think the two duelists will shoot at each other?
the mod post says one player will die
firing at each other makes the most sense to make that happen
the only other world I can see where that'd be certain is the one I theorized about in response to dwlee where they both have free reign but if a shooter doesn't kill the opponent they're guaranteed to die after the event (if first shooter kills the second, the second can't fire, otherwise the second either kills the first, or kills a second person outside of it and makes it so both duelists die)

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 10:15 am
by Morning Tweet
The second nominee is always positioned second on the vote count.

If a player has three votes, then goes down to one, tying them with another player with one, then the player who had originally reached three will be nominated.

If two players both have three votes at end of day, and they were never higher than three, then the one who reached three first would be nominated. This is what I mean by seniority.

I believed that plurality+seniority covers the second rule, but perhaps not all moderators do it this way.

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 10:17 am
by ulyana
hm, okay. so now if unwnd ever in a tie for second duelist it always going to be unwnd due to having reached 8 votes. hm.

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 10:18 am
by ulyana
In post 2953, ulyana wrote:hm, okay. so now if unwnd ever in a tie for second duelist it always going to be unwnd due to having reached 8 votes. hm.
*7

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 10:24 am
by Morning Tweet
If a player A has 7 votes, drops down to 3, and player B gets 3, then player A would be second place.

However, if player B then rises to 4, then goes back down to 3, that would make the player B the new second place.

It's a game of passing. You only rise above another player if you receive more votes than them. If no one rises above anyone, then the oldest wagon is by default at the top.

I hope this clarifies. This is how all of my votecounts function unless otherwise noted. If my rules do not convey this well, I will update them in the future.

My votecounts always convey wagon priority from top to bottom, so you can always be sure of who is being eliminated by looking at the top.

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 10:26 am
by ulyana
this clarifies, yes. and i will refrain from now using my vote/unvote just to make small adjustments to this even though i am tempted!

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 10:41 am
by Toogeloo
UNVOTE:

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 12:01 pm
by petapan
In post 2923, Taly wrote:Why is Cakez the optimal vote over Dunn?
okay, so, for dunn

i think the reasons for scumreading him are related to disengagement and one post about gamma that pooky scumread. and i don't think that's very solid.

yes i've been ranting and raving about killing the not towny people, theones who aren't solving the game

but the thing is, even if he's not engaged or super active, he has reads that he's putting out when he feels they're warranted. his posts have a bite to them that suggest these are legitimate opinions. i don't think he's playing to look presentable or go under the radar, he's just kind of saying stuff he feels strongly about while staying silent on the rest.

is that super solid locktown stuff? no, but i don't have him as my first choice for a vote today



as for cakez, i'll get to that but it's going to take me a while

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 12:29 pm
by unwnd
Got hired today

Feeling good about myself after being stuck in COVID drought

Why not spend the body high on some fucking mafia? I'll be doing a hard dive while I repeat this new LUM album

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 12:34 pm
by ulyana
In post 2959, unwnd wrote:Got hired today
congrats!

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 12:37 pm
by SirCakez
In post 2929, petapan wrote:
In post 2927, SirCakez wrote:a team that's trying to dominate the gamestate and completely control the direction of the town
pooky is a loud voice that has to go if you want to accomplish that
so that means that scum is in the more active players
why would a lurker scumteam not want to kill pooky lmao
idk dude i'm just theorizing
respond to my other questions
In post 2958, petapan wrote:but the thing is, even if he's not engaged or super active, he has reads that he's putting out when he feels they're warranted. his posts have a bite to them that suggest these are legitimate opinions. i don't think he's playing to look presentable or go under the radar, he's just kind of saying stuff he feels strongly about while staying silent on the rest.
I don't get this vibe from Dunn posts at all can you provide examples?

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 12:37 pm
by SirCakez
congrats unwnd :D

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 12:39 pm
by skitter30
In post 2959, unwnd wrote:Got hired today

Feeling good about myself after being stuck in COVID drought

Why not spend the body high on some fucking mafia? I'll be doing a hard dive while I repeat this new LUM album
Yay congrats!!!!!

I'll be around a little later

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 12:40 pm
by petapan
In post 2961, SirCakez wrote:idk dude i'm just theorizing
respond to my other questions
i didn't care to

my argument is that you getting fired up in response to unwnd is not a towntell and should not be read as such, it is not the reason why i think you're scum here

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 12:46 pm
by SirCakez
ok what is it?

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 12:52 pm
by petapan
cakez

did you just ask to see the case

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 1:04 pm
by SirCakez
no i want to see literally one sentence about why you SR me

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 1:05 pm
by SirCakez
but if you really want to pull that card then lol

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 1:05 pm
by petapan
too bad because you're getting the case

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 1:08 pm
by SirCakez
yay

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 1:10 pm
by petapan
but also here, while i'm compiling
In post 2961, SirCakez wrote:
In post 2929, petapan wrote:
In post 2927, SirCakez wrote:a team that's trying to dominate the gamestate and completely control the direction of the town
pooky is a loud voice that has to go if you want to accomplish that
so that means that scum is in the more active players
why would a lurker scumteam not want to kill pooky lmao
idk dude i'm just theorizing
"i'm just theorizing" doesn't really cut it as an answer, you actively said you were okay with eliminating me based on your supposed idea that i fit the gamestate of a team that would want pooky gone

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 1:17 pm
by unwnd
I think Dwlee is town.

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 1:17 pm
by unwnd
I have more I'm going to say but we're building shit.

I also think Gypyx is town.

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 1:17 pm
by unwnd
More confident in Dwlee because Gypyx is (Prism) slot but I digress.

We're getting somewhere.