Page 120 of 132
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 6:03 am
by pirate mollie
gamma why do you think we will hit lylo?
cos I agree, I don't fucking want to be in it
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 6:06 am
by Gammagooey
Dunno if we'll hit lylo or not, that was a response to reck on why I didnt investigate you and have no plans to do so (which he immediately forgot about and got mad at me for mentioning your post that reinforced that point)
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 6:16 am
by Your New Gay Overlords
I'm pretty sure I got ninja'd like fifty times and I thought you saying "please see above mollie post" was you calling her scum, not you saying you didnt want her in lylo
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 6:16 am
by Gammagooey
Im just gonna unvote and reread some more and then probably make a vote that seema ridiculous because every vote I can make seems like its on town
unvote
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 6:24 am
by Your New Gay Overlords
VOTE: Ythan
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 6:27 am
by pirate mollie
In post 2976, Gammagooey wrote:Dunno if we'll hit lylo or not, that was a response to reck on why I didnt investigate you and have no plans to do so (which he immediately forgot about and got mad at me for mentioning your post that reinforced that point)
there are some things I miss xposts and there are some things I get and some things that I don't
I am not familiar with you in forum play and I thought you were saying that you were confused about the results since you followed it with godfather wifom.
what I don't get is that you were wanting to lynch me on d2 cos of what exactly? cos I questioned waffles? ythan? cheery? pie? eagle things?
what I don't get is your re-evaluation, you seemed steeped, but I guess I will accept that your role name is legit even tho as far as I know I was the only 1 who was confused about the vanilla cop role but we still caught scum but if any1 else wants to step up and say that they drew the card and were confused as well then I hope they do so!
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 6:34 am
by Your New Gay Overlords
You know, there's a couple things to consider here:
1) If there's a Godfather, Gamma's results are useless.
2) Gamma could just be scum, here.
3) I'm not sure what stopped the kill, but it would SERIOUSLY CLEAR UP A LOT OF SHIT if we could claim today. WHY WOULDN'T WE, THERE'S ONE SCUM LEFT PROBABLY
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 6:38 am
by Iecerint
I think whoever is aware of the kill-stopping mechanism is probably in the best position to understand why it happened and whether claiming it would do much good.
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:00 am
by Untrod Tripod
can we just fucking mass claim here
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:03 am
by Magua
Reckoner (PEdit: and UT), look, assuming that people are rational, if someone has any information of use they'll *tell us*.
Mollie may fall outside that category, but she's already claimed, so hooray.
Yeah, there could be a godfather making Gamma's results useless. Got it.
Don't think Gamma is scum. Think if Gamma is scum, Eagle and Pie would've both had much better claims than the bullshit they were using.
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:14 am
by Untrod Tripod
In post 2984, Magua wrote:Don't think Gamma is scum. Think if Gamma is scum, Eagle and Pie would've both had much better claims than the bullshit they were using.
do you not see how that's an argument for mass claiming?
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:18 am
by Magua
If you think it's a good argument, you're limiting the claim pool to Jordan, Cheery, maaaaaybe Axxle?, which is, see, the lynch pool as it is without the mass claim.
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:20 am
by pirate mollie
In post 2986, Magua wrote:If you think it's a good argument, you're limiting the claim pool to Jordan, Cheery, maaaaaybe Axxle?, which is, see, the lynch pool as it is without the mass claim.
well so far you are the only 1 arguing against mass-claiming
why not let them speak for themselves
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:25 am
by Magua
wot is this i don even
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:31 am
by pirate mollie
I am sorry but didn't you say you were not going to claim?
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:34 am
by Gammagooey
im also against massclaiming. i feel that the people in this game are generally pretty competent and think that the reveal of any additional PRs to scum will outweigh any benefit to figuring out the setup by massclaiming. if an individual has info that they think is useful then i'm fairly sure that they'll come forward and actually say it without being forced into it.
we do need to get a claim from today's lynch but bridges and crossing them later and etc.
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:38 am
by Untrod Tripod
WELL HOW ABOUT WE GET A CLAIM OUT OF JORDAN BECAUSE IT'S SUPER UNLIKELY HE'LL BE ABLE TO COME UP WITH A GOOD FAKECLAIM AND HE'S PRETTY SCUMMY
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:40 am
by pirate mollie
CAN WE GET 1 OUT OF CHEERY AS WELL
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:48 am
by Gammagooey
eeeeeeeeeh i guess we can probably make jordan claim and it'll be fine
mollie can you treat my innocents as actual innocents for like
a single day
you can go back to thinking they're all godfathers tomorrow
but for today let's not fuck with them
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:51 am
by Untrod Tripod
it will not be fine
it will be legend
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:53 am
by Gammagooey
yeah sure fine make jordan claim
if he doesn't ill hop on the wagon to make him
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:55 am
by pirate mollie
they are all godfathers
EVERY SINGLE 1 OF THEM
but okay
what is the vc
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 8:01 am
by Antihero
i'm already a full-blown resident of the stupidhole
SO I GUESS THE JOKE'S ON YOU DIPSHIT
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 8:05 am
by Antihero
In post 2974, pirate mollie wrote:
it makes sense to dayvig a miller. it makes sense for *site meta* to vig triforce I guess. <--- neither of these 2 make sense to ME
IT WAS SARCASM, MOLLIE
SARCASM
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 8:11 am
by Antihero
VOTE: ythan