Page 13 of 52
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 9:41 am
by Yates
↑ xRECKONERx wrote:saying you have varying degrees of scumreads but no townreads is a terrible way of doing this
I disagree. As I stated in post 296, "I think that [100% town read] will require investigation information or confirmed scum hunting success." If it makes you feel better, you may consider my "less than suspicious" list almost the same as a "town read."
@Sleepy Post 297:
I would argue that my "litmus posts" had a measured amount of content that served their purpose; to elicit player reactions and contextual responses. I noobed, baited, flamed, and just short of trolled to shake the tree and see what fell out. You, FoN, Reck, and Pine are doing essentially the same thing but in a far more obvious way presumably because you are known entities on this site.
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 9:44 am
by SleepyKrew
Oh. Cool. Be my Mason?
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 10:12 am
by Force of Nature
↑ SodaSpirit17 wrote:Any explanation to that vote? Or are you just gonna sit there with a vote on me and expect everyone to wagon..
Scum have a way of asking for an explanation where town would essentially just call the accuser dumb or scum.
↑ SodaSpirit17 wrote:Looks like everyone is voting Furco but whatever
UNVOTE:
Honestly I felt like that was just an RVS vote too, but turned into a wagon.
I can see no purpose to unvoting here other than hiding.
↑ SodaSpirit17 wrote:How? I don't really see the Furco argument as logical, and my RVS wasn't either, so I thought we were still in RVS.
eb4p: cool I'm getting jumped and I just started. Life is GREAT!
↑ SodaSpirit17 wrote:are you serious? I hope not. Not claiming til I get to -1.
I hate it when people say someone's a liability, we're all one town, everybody should have a say in everything, and everyone should listen, but not act accordingly necessarily.
Don't see the hopping on RVS wagon as a scum-tell. It's early in the game, pressure needs to be had. So uh yea, why do you all think i'm a liability?
He has an ongoing theme of 'why am I being voted wahhh' rather than 'CEASE YOUR INSOLENCE LETS GO KILL SOME SCUM.'
He wants to engage his accusers and get them to go away rather than focusing on diving deep, figuring out the game, and finding scum.
↑ SodaSpirit17 wrote:Triangle vote on Grimm was very awful, for his reasons given. Augh.
Llama's floppiness is kind of a null-tell but usually it's a scum-tell.
However, I feel like this is the time to make my first real vote.
VOTE: SleepyKrew
SK ol' buddy,I really really hated it when you asked me to claim at l-3. That was really stupid, and it looks like rolefishing fmpov. Justify yourself.
'It looks like rolefishing' instead of 'SK is rolefishing scum.'
'Llama is floppy and kinda null but maybe scum'
There just isn't the assertiveness of a guy who knows his is the side of justice.
↑ SodaSpirit17 wrote:I really don't like Yates either, but it makes a really suspicious of triangle when she voted Yates right after Llama FOSed Yates and then unvoted her.
UNVOTE: SK
VOTE: Triangle
Triangle is a juicy juicy wagon of the breed scumbags <3.
I also think scum ponder mechanics of how to manipulate wagons (like voting somebody your accusers think is scum) more than town do, so that's kind of a scum thing to notice.
VOTE: SodaSpirit17
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 10:46 am
by Pine
↑ Force of Nature wrote: ↑ SodaSpirit17 wrote:Any explanation to that vote? Or are you just gonna sit there with a vote on me and expect everyone to wagon..
Scum have a way of asking for an explanation where town would essentially just call the accuser dumb or scum.
I agree with the majority of your case on Soda, but not this. Personally, I can think of very, very little in this game more frustrating than being Town and having unexplained votes on me. I've gone batshit on people for not having good reasons (not counting RVS) for their votes, when all of mine (both as Town and as scum) are meticulously considered and usually explained in detail.
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 11:05 am
by Force of Nature
Yeah, there are very few 100% scum only things.
Adding together several things that scum do more often than town leads to happy places though.
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 11:34 am
by SleepyKrew
Pine... Please...
Anyway people with Llamarble history, does he tend to be vote-hoppy?
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 12:44 pm
by Force of Nature
YOU BETCHYER ASS, CAPTAIN!
Also this game hasn't had wagons getting actual traction because of ALL THE LURKERS.
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:59 pm
by SodaSpirit17
Well triangle is one of those scumbags.
And sometimes I feel like I defend more than I offend, but I've been gettin' down and dirty with the scumhunting.
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 2:35 pm
by Yates
Is mod allowing masons in this game? Neighbors? Best Friends?
Danke.
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 3:08 pm
by implosion
Hi. I still exist, and I've been keeping up, but I've been really, REALLY bogged down in college application work. It's pretty much crunch time from now until November (and then to a lesser extent from early november to mid-november). I can still keep up, but don't expect anything profound.
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 3:19 pm
by Llamarble
↑ Regfan wrote:
Not Voting (5):
Per, Kondi2424, Grimmjow, Mattman, Furcolow.
BE USEFUL.
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 3:20 pm
by Force of Nature
↑ Regfan wrote:
Not Voting (5):
Per, Kondi2424, Grimmjow, Mattman, Furcolow.
BE USEFUL.
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 3:28 pm
by Force of Nature
The number one reason towns lose is low morale / disinterest / lack of people doing things.
Everybody who doesn't have a vote in play needs to read the thread, place a vote, and note the most important reason they think the player they voted is scum.
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 3:35 pm
by Yates
Kondi voted in 252
Posted 246, 252, 257, 260
Nothing useful, but at least he posted.
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 7:44 pm
by Regfan
SodaSpirit17 (4): Implosion, Pine, Mattman, Force of Nature
Triangle123 (3): xRECKONERx, SodaSpirit17, Yates
SleepyKrew (1): Kondi2424
Yates (1): Triangle123
Mattman (1): SleepyKrew
Not Voting (3):
Per, Grimmjow, Furcolow.
With 13 alive it takes 7 to lynch or no lynch. The deadline is in
(expired on 2011-10-31 23:00:00)
Per has not picked up his prod and is now being replaced.
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 8:19 pm
by SleepyKrew
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Soda
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 12:50 am
by Pine
↑ SleepyKrew wrote:Pine... Please...
Anyway people with Llamarble history, does he tend to be vote-hoppy?
Please what? Use your words like a big boy.
Yes, he does.
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 3:41 am
by SleepyKrew
Answer that question...
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 4:37 am
by Pine
What question? I've answered all of your inane questions at least twice.
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 5:05 am
by SleepyKrew
↑ SleepyKrew wrote:PLEASE FORGIVE ME O GREAT ONES
I asked the wrong question. Here it is for reals, answer it and you'll probably never hear about it again:
How would you describe my usual scum play? Good, bad, flipfloppy, etc? How good/bad would be uncharacteristicslly good/bad?
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 5:09 am
by Force of Nature
I can't come up with any reason Pine's opinion of your exact playskill would be useful to you as town.
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 5:10 am
by SleepyKrew
It probably won't be, but it might come in handy. Maybe.
Anyway what made you call me out now, even though I've been asking him about my playstyle for a while now?
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 5:29 am
by xRECKONERx
This Soda wagon is still terrible.
More triangle votes please.
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 5:31 am
by Force of Nature
You've been spamfully asking irrelevant questions.
I was serious when I said you should do some ISOs or something.
You're not lurking, so try to figure out who scum are.
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 5:36 am
by xRECKONERx
PEOPLE I'D LYNCH TODAY:
triangle
kondi
Force of Nature
SleepyKrew
WHO ARE YOU AGAIN?
Per
Grimmjow
Furcolow
Mattman
NOT GONNA LYNCH:
Pine
Yates
implosion