Page 13 of 110

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 1:57 pm
by Robert2424
So now your encouraging somebody to hammer Lurker Agent?

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 1:57 pm
by Jake from State Farm
I've never played monopoly that long lol, after about 2 hours I say "fuck this game" and get drunk/high

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:04 pm
by Mogadishu Jones
StrangerCoug wrote:
Mogadishu Jones wrote:Announcing L-1 doesnt negate the risk of a speed hammer. Why not just play it safe?

Why play it safe? Why bend over backwards for other people's carelessness, for that matter?

Wo's talking about carelessness? I'm talking about well veiled hammers to end the day waaaayy earlier than necessary. In this case, its moot as lurker has claimed.

Speaking of, he didnt even full claim in his original claim. Thats that ish I don't like.

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:06 pm
by Mogadishu Jones
Robert2424 wrote:I'm not sure how to feel about Jones. What is everyboys thoughts on him

Robert2424 wrote:I feel up in the air with him right now.

Wow do tell me more.

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:20 pm
by Lurker
Mogadishu Jones wrote:
StrangerCoug wrote:
Mogadishu Jones wrote:Announcing L-1 doesnt negate the risk of a speed hammer. Why not just play it safe?

Why play it safe? Why bend over backwards for other people's carelessness, for that matter?

Wo's talking about carelessness? I'm talking about well veiled hammers to end the day waaaayy earlier than necessary. In this case, its moot as lurker has claimed.

Speaking of, he didnt even full claim in his original claim. Thats that ish I don't like.


Would you consider Vanilla +1 shot-ability A vanilla?

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:28 pm
by Mehdi2277
I'm curious who the hammer intent is since I see a lack of one and mog while it was strange it wasn't scum motivated. He said most of it and the one part he left vague isn't something he'd have been able to keep vague (so yes I recommend you claim the 1 shot ability). He's still responding quickly to when he's been at L-1 and doesn't look more apathetic or constantly focus on defending/avoiding things.

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:31 pm
by Agent_Ireland
Robert2424 wrote:So now your encouraging somebody to hammer Lurker Agent?


I never said that. I was giving my opinion as to what I believe would happen to someone's property cards after they have died.

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:32 pm
by Lurker
My 1-shot ability Is watcher.

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:34 pm
by Mehdi2277
He's not dying since now he can guarantee one person's live to the next day (if that person dies he'll have a guilty to claim). Preferably who scum would want dead most, but the action is definitely being directed.

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:38 pm
by Agent_Ireland
Mehdi2277 wrote:He's not dying since now he can guarantee one person's live to the next day (if that person dies he'll have a guilty to claim). Preferably who scum would want dead most, but the action is definitely being directed.


agreed

UNVOTE:

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:52 pm
by Mogadishu Jones
Lurker wrote:
Mogadishu Jones wrote:
StrangerCoug wrote:
Mogadishu Jones wrote:Announcing L-1 doesnt negate the risk of a speed hammer. Why not just play it safe?

Why play it safe? Why bend over backwards for other people's carelessness, for that matter?

Wo's talking about carelessness? I'm talking about well veiled hammers to end the day waaaayy earlier than necessary. In this case, its moot as lurker has claimed.

Speaking of, he didnt even full claim in his original claim. Thats that ish I don't like.


Would you consider Vanilla +1 shot-ability A vanilla?

I would consider it a vanilla +1 shot ability and would say as much

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:53 pm
by Mogadishu Jones
Mehdi2277 wrote:I'm curious who the hammer intent is since I see a lack of one and mog while it was strange it wasn't scum motivated. He said most of it and the one part he left vague isn't something he'd have been able to keep vague (so yes I recommend you claim the 1 shot ability). He's still responding quickly to when he's been at L-1 and doesn't look more apathetic or constantly focus on defending/avoiding things.

Hes not defending much of anything.

As for who the hammer intent is, what is it with you guys expecting me to see the future?

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:55 pm
by Robert2424
Its a one shot Lurker?

@Jones, Your acting like I should just assume your town, not going to happen.

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:55 pm
by Mogadishu Jones
Lurker wrote:My 1-shot ability Is watcher.


-_-

unvote

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:55 pm
by Mogadishu Jones
Robert2424 wrote:Its a one shot Lurker?

@Jones, Your acting like I should just assume your town, not going to happen.

Go on, do tell me more.

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:57 pm
by Mogadishu Jones
Lurker wrote:My 1-shot ability Is watcher.

Robert2424 wrote:Its a one shot Lurker?

@Jones, Your acting like I should just assume your town, not going to happen.

Robert my man, I smoke a shit ton of weed but you sir have got to be on some supercalifragilistichronic.

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:58 pm
by StrangerCoug
Mogadishu Jones wrote:
StrangerCoug wrote:
Mogadishu Jones wrote:Announcing L-1 doesnt negate the risk of a speed hammer. Why not just play it safe?

Why play it safe? Why bend over backwards for other people's carelessness, for that matter?

Wo's talking about carelessness? I'm talking about well veiled hammers to end the day waaaayy earlier than necessary. In this case, its moot as lurker has claimed.

Any way you chop it up attracts negative attention to the hammerer, whether you're not paying attention or are trying to hide the fact that you're hammering (which is hard to do, since you have to bold it or use the vote tags). You're talking about vote shenanigans, which is not the norm here (though I've seen it here).

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 3:00 pm
by Mehdi2277
Mogadishu Jones wrote:As for who the hammer intent is, what is it with you guys expecting me to see the future?

It's just convention on this site to almost never hammer without stating hammer intent to allow other people to comment. Might be ignored if someone has already claimed, but otherwise it's just generally stuck too (one big reason why quick hammers almost never happen).

He hinted the power earlier when he said his utility gave him some nice power and it's not like he wouldn't have been made to claim it so the scum motivation of hiding power would be to go fully vanilla not soft claim part making him end up full claiming later.

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 3:03 pm
by Mogadishu Jones
I feel like I'm talking to a park full of benches about this claim thing, it really doesnt matter but I for one think from a mafia theory standpoint youre behind if you think l-1 as claim time is apropo.

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 3:03 pm
by Agent_Ireland
Mod: requesting prod on Nobody special and NumberQ

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 3:05 pm
by Mogadishu Jones
Mehdi2277 wrote:
Mogadishu Jones wrote:As for who the hammer intent is, what is it with you guys expecting me to see the future?

It's just convention on this site to almost never hammer without stating hammer intent to allow other people to comment. Might be ignored if someone has already claimed, but otherwise it's just generally stuck too (one big reason why quick hammers almost never happen).

He hinted the power earlier when he said his utility gave him some nice power and it's not like he wouldn't have been made to claim it so the scum motivation of hiding power would be to go fully vanilla not soft claim part making him end up full claiming later.

Is it really a convention that is so rigorously adhered to that the thought of someone breaking this here is considered ludicrous?

If the answer is yes, then I concede my opinion on this matter in favor of yours

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 3:06 pm
by Mehdi2277
9/10 times it'll occur and the tenth either better have a good reason or will be fosed a lot later. That's how rigorous it is.

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 3:07 pm
by Mehdi2277
Exception being games that are like 5 players big, but for something past 9 it's rare.

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 3:09 pm
by Mogadishu Jones
Mehdi2277 wrote:9/10 times it'll occur and the tenth either better have a good reason or will be fosed a lot later. That's how rigorous it is.

Oh well fos' are useless imo, l-2 just seems like a better option. Like why not be safe when you can?

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 3:09 pm
by Mogadishu Jones
I mean where i play hemmers are usually announced but you dont take that risk.