Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:07 pm
I confused Empking with Nacho, sorry.
It was a good answer, but not an answer that was alignment indicative.
Page 13 of 49
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:52 pm
It was a good answer, but not an answer that was alignment indicative.
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 5:41 pm
↑ Human Destroyer wrote:Um...why?
Because I thought that one of them was scummy, obviously.
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:08 am
"Heh heh. Thank you. That was a fine trade. I have this funny feeling we'll meet again soon. And we'll make another fine trade, of course!"
Tenth vote count of Day one
PeregrineV: 6 (Debonair Danny DiPietro, VP Baltar, Nachomamma8, Human Destroyer, chkflip, TheOneWhoKnocks)
Human Destroyer: 2 (FourTrouble, RestFermata)
Iecerint: 1 (Empking)
RestFermata: 1 (Iecerint)
Debonair Danny DiPietro: 1 (JasonT1981)
TheOneWhoKnocks - 1 (PeregrineV)
Not voting: 1 (leviathan93)
With
13
players alive it takes 7
to lynch- PeregrineVhas been prodded.
- leviathan93has been proded.
- jasonT1981has been proded.
DEADLINE:
(expired on 2013-03-07 21:00:00)Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:49 am
↑ RestFermata wrote:Some quick thoughts before I head out. PV seems to be voting SK for the same reason that everyone is voting PV, which is sort of amusing to me.
Sort of. I have enough town people that I'd rather get a grip on a null player.
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:54 am
I'll analyze my wagon throughout the day. Can't find any actual reasons I'm being voted, but I'm sure there's something somewhere out of 6 people.
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 6:45 am
prod recieved.
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 11:26 am
I forgot I replaced into this. I'M ON IT.
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 11:28 am
↑ Iecerint wrote:↑ Human Destroyer wrote:Um...why?
Because I thought that one of them was scummy, obviously.
Did you think their replacing out was scummy, or did you think the people being replaced were scummy before that?
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 11:31 am
Mostly the latter.
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:51 pm
Waiting for the answer to this Iec.
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:52 pm
Damn younon refreshed page on my phone. Scratch that last post.
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:27 pm
sorry guys! been stupid and forgot i had this game since its been going kind of slow for me.
I will just announce that too get the game moving, I believe that peregrine is slightly scummy and will be hammering but allow him a chance to defend. announcing this.
I will just announce that too get the game moving, I believe that peregrine is slightly scummy and will be hammering but allow him a chance to defend. announcing this.
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:50 pm
I do agree on the PereV wagon, good chance of hitting scum. HD 251 kinda sums it up. PereV 231 vote on SK just seems out of nowhere to.
Intent to hammer if hammer is not dropped by time I get back online.
Intent to hammer if hammer is not dropped by time I get back online.
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:52 pm
↑ jasonT1981 wrote:HD 251 kinda sums it up.
It does?
All I said about PV was that that one post was shit and to ask for explanations.
This, on the other hand, is what you're looking for.
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 2:23 pm
Oh, for real, we're about to lynch PV? I'm okay with that, but it does seem a bit hasty to drop the hammer right after he comes back from V/LA.
I must admit I'm a little wary about how this wagon seemed to gather speed so quickly; nonetheless, his behavior has not been very suggestive of a town alignment, or else he is very lazy, even lazier than me, and I certainly haven't put enough effort into the day so far. I am willing to hammer -after- we get a claim.
I must admit I'm a little wary about how this wagon seemed to gather speed so quickly; nonetheless, his behavior has not been very suggestive of a town alignment, or else he is very lazy, even lazier than me, and I certainly haven't put enough effort into the day so far. I am willing to hammer -after- we get a claim.
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 2:24 pm
i said i would wait but that i was willing to hammer. of course i'm not going to hammer without anything.
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 2:26 pm
I was referring more to jason's last post, lev.
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 2:28 pm
lol. ah. still regardless of which one of us hammers if that is how this goes. cuz i do believe in human destroyer's point against jason. mis using his quote does seem kind of scummy especially to enter to hammer someone. i am looking at jason being kind of scummy now cuz of post 314.
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 2:33 pm
↑ Human Destroyer wrote:↑ jasonT1981 wrote:HD 251 kinda sums it up.
It does?
All I said about PV was that that one post was shit and to ask for explanations.
This, on the other hand, is what you're looking for.
Yes, I appologize.. I was reading 251 in another tab while typing and typed 251. Sorry. I keep two tabs open, one for writing... one for reading lol. When I was reading back over the last few pages I typed it by mistake.
oops
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 2:50 pm
^^^if that was a mistake, then ok.
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 3:33 pm
I have already answered this.
It's kind of a silly question as I read it, though, so you will have to be more specific if you want a more specific answer.
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:34 pm
Claim PV. Intent to hammer shown.
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 6:19 pm
Anyone (jason?) who wants to conveniently "forget" that we're supposed to let people claim before they're lynched gets a big fat sausage finger of suspicion from yours truly, no matter how PV flips, but especially if he ends up being town. When I'm scum I'm generally okay with this slipping the town's mind, and I doubt scum-me is alone in this mindset.
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 7:59 pm
Sexy soft-claim slash WIFOM there, Ringo. I like the way you flaunt it.