Mafiascum.net

FourTrouble and RachMarie have been prodded.

The game is hardly more boring than it was before I replaced lurkerJosh.
CES, I've seen your Rach read. Why is it town?

Ignoring your scum buddy definitely counts as boring. Josh at least gave me things to ponder.

Like what? Josh went "I'll get to it later".
Like, four times.

Anyway, what is there for me to say about Jason? That stupid isn't a scumtell? Would lynch Jason but wanted to show support for the undersupported wagon, Rach.
Also, you completely failed to answer me,

Why did your mind go to Jason when I said "your scum buddy"?

I'd like to think I succeeded in not answering your question rather than failing to answer.

Of note: the -ty half of the adorable puppy hydra (it's really a pity that Orthros isn't cute) supports this Whiskers wagon. /)

↑ Whiskers wrote:

↑ RachMarie wrote:Thanks for changing CES, it is too early for a lynch, and I have played with FT before it would not surprise me if he came in and hammered without paying attention. I don't know Josh, but I gather from what was said that he too tends to derp.

In this post:
"FT is reckless and absent-minded and would probably quickhammer on page 2, the stupid cunt."

Also sucking up to CES. If I decide not to come back to this point, you can ignore it, it's just here so I don't forget it.

Even better:

↑ RachMarie wrote:Cause I have seen it happen.

Besides I was not saying you are scum. you seem awfully defensive. I still have yet to determine who is scum and who is not.

In this post:
"Whoa, you were actually reading the horrible thing I said and called me out on it. Get off me, before someone notices you're right!"

Is it just how I read it?

...This is almost embarrassing. I get the impression this is how play as scum and why it is that horribly obvious when I'm not Town. There is no motivation-seeking in this post, just pointed out the Bad Bad Things That RachMarie Has Done In This Game, You Guys.

No need to be mean, Tierce.

↑ Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Why did your mind go to Jason when I said "your scum buddy"?

He's my other scumread, the one I mentioned but largely ignored, and also someone who has a wagon with some support. If I were scum, that's one of the ways I might play-- lightly bus my lynchable scumbuddy but focus elsewhere.

I could ask, "why do you think Rach is not my scumbuddy," but I'd get a non-answer from you. Maybe better, I could ask you why you think I'm scum.
But I get the feeling that would be wasted effort too, since your approach is so weak that you're trying to get me to scumslip. Again, I may as well just roll over and die, if you're going to just roll over and lynch me sans ceremony.

I'm afraid poor newfag Whiskers doesn't get it. Supposed motivation was already explained by me, in a post

before

that. Is it that I'm supposed to restate all of me explanations in every post? Did you forget to read my posts before this? Did you fail to realize that the post you quoted is specifically an answer to a question D&C asked me?

But I'm not going to defend myself from nothing. If you've got something to bring against me, go ahead.

↑ Whiskers wrote:

↑ Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Why did your mind go to Jason when I said "your scum buddy"?

He's my other scumread, the one I mentioned but largely ignored, and also someone who has a wagon with some support. If I were scum, that's one of the ways I might play-- lightly bus my lynchable scumbuddy but focus elsewhere.

I could ask, "why do you think Rach is not my scumbuddy," but I'd get a non-answer from you. Maybe better, I could ask you why you think I'm scum.
But I get the feeling that would be wasted effort too, since your approach is so weak that you're trying to get me to scumslip. Again, I may as well just roll over and die, if you're going to just roll over and lynch me sans ceremony.

__
Sorry, I just looked. I that first link I didn't explain the motivation, only that it was discrediting. Here's the scum motivation for discrediting: players will pay less positive attention to the discredited player.
Kind of thought you were too experienced to need me to explain this kind of stuff...

↑ Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:No need to be mean, Tierce.

I think my sadistic tendencies are rubbing off on her.

↑ Dazed and Confused wrote:

↑ Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:No need to be mean, Tierce.

I think my sadistic tendencies are rubbing off on her.

Vice versa, if anything. Wolf puppy can have feral tendencies.

I'm starting to agree with CES about Nacho. I really didn't like the "extremely town" comment on Rach in 262 and Nacho's follow up isn't making any sense to me whatsoever. Rach is not even close to busting her ass off to get things done, I get the feeling Nacho's trying to rationalize his read after-the-fact instead of having thought it out before hand.

CES, you never answered Whiskers' question about Rach. I have the same question, do you mind answering it now?

↑ FourTrouble wrote:CES, you never answered Whiskers' question about Rach. I have the same question, do you mind answering it now?

Nah, it's boring.

Both Whiskers and Josh have committed clear "Nacho is my partner" tells. Just a matter of wrapping up the game now.

I got distracted. Be back tonight.

↑ Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:

↑ FourTrouble wrote:CES, you never answered Whiskers' question about Rach. I have the same question, do you mind answering it now?

Nah, it's boring.

Both Whiskers and Josh have committed clear "Nacho is my partner" tells. Just a matter of wrapping up the game now.

Not that we'll ever hear what those tells are...

Already elaborated on the Josh one in 295; the one you committed was interpreting my "your scum buddy" as referring to Jason despite my Josh-Nacho theory having gotten a good amount of attention.

Posting to say that I (Empire) won't be very active this weekend due to this fucking stupid application + work, and also, to say that Nacho should just bus Whiskers already so we can win the game, thanks in advance.

↑ Dazed and Confused wrote:Posting to say that I (Empire) won't be very active this weekend due to this fucking stupid application + work, and also, to say that Nacho should just bus Whiskers already so we can win the game, thanks in advance.

Look at all these arrogant scummers. You can't tell which one is scum because they act like they know something you don't.

Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Already elaborated on the Josh one in 295; the one you committed was interpreting my "your scum buddy" as referring to Jason despite my Josh-Nacho theory having gotten a good amount of attention.

I don't get it, what does that have to do with anything?
Sorry, I wasn't looking at your theories in order to craft a less-scummy answer. I was referring to a player I thought was scum, who a bunch of other players seemed to think is scum, and one who I was ignoring.

An other problem is, I still don't understand why Nacho is supposed to be scum. I read the thread, nothing jumped out. Had him at null. Is it just the low activity? I'm looking through his ISO and the scummiest thing is that most of his posts are one line, or a bunch of one-line responses.

So so far, we're lynching lurkers.

Hey Whiskers, who else is a scum read outside Rach?

I'll be back in a little bit once I have nom'ed pizza.

Jason, for reasons that should be obvious (although, I had to explain why discrediting might show scum-motivation...), and Sixty, for gut.

I'm have townreads in You, D&C, and CES.

FT is town-null, and Nacho is null-null.

We have the same reads near on. I pretty much dislike this game because people shit on my scum reads and tell me they are town and I'm getting zero traction anywhere. I feel lost.

I was tempted to vote you because of D+C but I can't bring myself to do it because we are one in this game. It would be like voting myself.

I'm gonna read the last couple of pages again and see if I get swayed by anything. I also need to look back into Nacho. I remember him posting but not actually scum hunting anywhere.

Posting from my phone to mention that Nacho has basically stopped posting ever since we started piling on Whiskers.