Mafiascum.net

Posted: **Sun Mar 10, 2013 3:06 pm**

Not so obvious; see here.

Posted: **Sun Mar 10, 2013 3:10 pm**

*Ahem* sorry I disagree with you.

Two players go off on each other can give others an excuse to lurk (unless they're you, you don't need an excuse

).

Also, theory is one of those null things, if someone does a lot of theory that basically begins to trap scum, that's pro town. Small stuff like that and minor contradictions are not indicative of alignment.

The result of what he did when he replaced in was an activity boost, people didn't stop posting just because he said that, he just said not to oversaturate it. This is basic advice.

Of course, I could be misinterpreting what he said there.

Which did you mean, Fuzzy?

Posted: **Sun Mar 10, 2013 3:15 pm**

I'm sorry. I'm lost. What's the question?

Posted: **Sun Mar 10, 2013 3:16 pm**

↑ fuzzybutternut wrote:Newbie games are for Newbies who want to learn how the game is played. I'm probably coming off as an ass right now, but I don't want you to carry your current thoughts throughout the rest of your games on here, because you will DEFINITELY be the first lynch if you keep up your thoughts.
Being active isn't bad, but can get annoying when only two people are posting. That gives scum a reason not to post. There should be no claiming as of right now anyway.

Posted: **Sun Mar 10, 2013 3:18 pm**

Oh! okay, I'm sorry. I thought NS was referring to his own post there.

I was giving basic advice, as I feel it is my job to do, considering I'm one of the more experienced players here.

Posted: **Sun Mar 10, 2013 3:21 pm**

↑ Remembrance wrote:
Kuror! Why are you so scummy this game? Will read game again, but not liking your artificial play.

Welcome Remem, nice to see you here. I'm not scummy it is just my normal style.

Fuzzy cake, I couldn't help but notice you logged in at least 3 times since my last post, but you didn't reply anything to it. (Yeah i was keeping track of you

). Not only that was amusing but to come and find this:

fuzzybutternut wrote:tbh, I thought my post had went through. Went off for the weekend, just got back on this thread today, and noticed that it actually hadn't gone through, and I forgot what I was going to say.
In all fairness, though, It's not my job to produce content, it's everyone's job.

My post was on Saturday, I noticed you read the thread Saturday too after my post and didn't said anything and today(Sunday) you had checked the thread at least twice before the replacements came in, and didn't say anything either. So you say you went off for the weekend but actually you were keeping track of the game, just didn't want to participate or probably just waiting for someone to back you up or something because you couldn't make a case on me based on facts.

So due to this and the previous discussion we had, I am going to

VOTE: Fuzzy

Feeling confident about him being scum now.

Posted: **Sun Mar 10, 2013 3:24 pm**

? No I didn't. Saturday I was at a party, and didn't get home until 3 AM. Nice try though.

Posted: **Sun Mar 10, 2013 3:27 pm**

So you never checked the thread before the replacements started posting?

Posted: **Sun Mar 10, 2013 3:28 pm**

VOTE COUNT 1.5

Varsoon (0) -
fuzzybutternut (2) - Nobody Special, kuror0
Approximately Normal Guy (0) -
GuyInFreezer (0) -
Remembrance (1) - GuyInFreezer
RandomYoshi (2) - Varsoon, Nachomamma8
kuror0 (3) - Remembrance, RandomYoshi, fuzzybutternut
Nobody Special (0) -
Nachomamma8 (0) -

Not Voting: Approximately Normal Guy

With 9 alive, it's 5 to lynch.

Day 1 deadline is Thursday, March 21st at 4:00 am PST or in

(expired on 2013-03-21 04:00:00)

Posted: **Sun Mar 10, 2013 3:32 pm**

We are not lynching someone over where they go or do not go on certain days.

I'm not going to defend Fuzzy more than this, he's not worth it.

Maybe he'll be worth more later. Be more town fuzzy, you have the power.

Posted: **Sun Mar 10, 2013 3:36 pm**

Oh. I have a vote on.
UNVOTE:
for now.

↑ kuror0 wrote:
↑ fuzzybutternut wrote:
That's the thing. You ONLY say something when someone directs something at you.
You're not posting your thoughts, you're only defending yourself.

Nice try. But this is the first time someone talks directly to me.

So is that mean you won't ever talk unless someone talks to you directly?

Skimming over stuff for now and I see mostly a theory discussion. -.-

The post quota things and no-lynch discussion is something I'll have to look over closely.

Posted: **Sun Mar 10, 2013 3:36 pm**

↑ kuror0 wrote:So you never checked the thread before the replacements started posting?

The last time I checked the thread was when I sent that post, and that was from a McDonald's.
Remembrance, I believe Kurorororor is scum. What do you think?

Posted: **Sun Mar 10, 2013 3:39 pm**

Need, more time. Let me work. I have three games, and I'm not quite sure how to deal with it efficiently.

I will reread and get back to you, my impression from the reading I did a few days ago (from when I messaged the previous mod to replace in), was that Kuror was not being himself. He cares more what people think about him, and is acting stiff. He was not like this last game.

Posted: **Sun Mar 10, 2013 4:27 pm**

Actually, guy in freezer has a point.

Isn't that your beetle juice tell Kuror? You know, the one where a player never shows up if they aren't directly addressed or voted? *takes notes*

APG: @Post #110, why didn't you have a read on kuror? What IS your read on Kuror? Why aren't you voting? Holy crap, I don't even think you've acknowledged his existence, you ignored a direct question he asked of you! WHY WHY WHY.

Posted: **Sun Mar 10, 2013 4:31 pm**

Okay, I missed two replies. Woops.

Posted: **Sun Mar 10, 2013 5:10 pm**

↑ GuyInFreezer wrote:

↑ kuror0 wrote:
↑ fuzzybutternut wrote:
That's the thing. You ONLY say something when someone directs something at you.
You're not posting your thoughts, you're only defending yourself.

Nice try. But this is the first time someone talks directly to me.

So is that mean you won't ever talk unless someone talks to you directly?

Found it funny you took only the first phrase of the whole post to make that misrep... let me quote the next paragraph of the same post to solve your doubts.

↑ kuror0 wrote:
Also, I haven't post my thoughts? lol. I have voiced my opinion and posted my reasons every time someone take a decision that may have a big impact on the game(you and your no lynch, Varsoon and the quota, etc). None of those were directed to me particularly but i was actively discussing it and posted my thoughts about it. Also as i said in a previous post I've been following my own leads I don't need to sheep someone to scumhunt.

Posted: **Sun Mar 10, 2013 6:01 pm**

You know what, I think Nobody Special meant Varsoon is not obv. Town, not Butter (who is in no way obv. town).

Uh, that's town paranoia. I was tempted to post that a lot to try and preempt any moves against me too. Or maybe it's not town paranoia. It's just as a newbie, I was totally like, "What if someone tickles me and I flinch?" That's what it looks like to me "Don't tickle me, I won't flinch *Will actually flinch if tickled*"

Posted: **Sun Mar 10, 2013 6:04 pm**

It's too late night here so I'll be posting reads of who I ISO'd so far.

Fuzzy - first of all, his post 137. It looks like a scumbluff to me(psh, I'm not scared of your vote!). many of his actions looks scummy during that NL discussion. Constant "meta me" defence (193,202) didn't look good. With 4 games, meta doesn't help people much. Also, I see the "meta me" defense as llazy defense. Also with the nl vote and saying "is there any scums this game?" Strikes as he wasn't actively scumhunting. (176). Post 278 looks like he is happy that he escaped the pressure that was on him. Leaning scum.

Varsoon: I don't like his "I'm a newb. Understand me" stuffs. It sounds like he's setting up so that he might cover his "slips" with the "I'm a newb" excuse. I didn't like his reaction against NS's reads AT ALL. Also at one point he calls over-eager to scumhunt a scumtell. What? His post 121 looks weird (the part about he being sorry for making a case on RY.) However, his play in general seems pro-town, such as trying to generate more discussions and stuff. So for now, null.

I'll do the rest tomorrow.

@Rem: coaching your scumbuddy fuzzy in post 309?

Posted: **Sun Mar 10, 2013 6:07 pm**

I can't coach someone more experienced than I am, GuyinFreezer. Also:

Remembrance wrote:Nobody! *hugs* I'm town this game, no one tell you otherwise. They're lying and scum.

Are you scum? Or are you lying?

Posted: **Sun Mar 10, 2013 6:07 pm**

Well, I guess if you were scum you would, by necessity, have to be both lying and scum.

So just the first question.

Posted: **Sun Mar 10, 2013 6:11 pm**

Oops. My bad. "Cheering" is better word to use.
And no I ain't scum.

Posted: **Sun Mar 10, 2013 6:11 pm**

^ you're probably scum. Just saying.

Posted: **Sun Mar 10, 2013 6:24 pm**

@kururu - what's your opinion on Nacho?

Posted: **Sun Mar 10, 2013 6:36 pm**

Last game he also went missing a lot during the first day and his participation level has been low this game. He tends to do a lot of accusations around to try and catch something, I guess, but something is a bit off this game. His actions are about the same as the game we had previous to this one(Remem was there too and NS was our mod), but the timing is not the same. Also his scumhunting seems a bit weaker(as in I remember him doing better and more questions), wich makes me feel a little iffy about him.

I am giving him the benefit of doubt for now because it is early to get an accurate read of his actions, so keeping him at null for now. I will have some better reads when we get close to the deadline and some more interactions have happened.

Posted: **Sun Mar 10, 2013 6:39 pm**

^ This read is about what I have for him based on his meta. Sorry to sheep, but there you go.

Mafiascum.net

Newbie 1339 - Game Over! (Scum Win)