Page 13 of 48
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 4:32 pm
by TheIrishPope
Man that video was amazing. Poor Virginia/Vagina/Banana.
In any case, I find it unfathomable that you defend your scum partner Bacde so gleefully. Better watch your words, Majin Buu.
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 4:52 pm
by Ghostlin
In post 300, TheIrishPope wrote:Man that video was amazing. Poor Virginia/Vagina/Banana.
In any case, I find it unfathomable that you defend your scum partner Bacde so gleefully. Better watch your words, Majin Buu.
Man that video was amazing. Poor Virginia/Vagina/Banana.In any case, I find it unfathomable that you defend your scum partner Bacde so gleefully. Better watch your words, Majin Buu.
Wasn't I your only scum read not that long ago, Pope?
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 5:14 pm
by TheIrishPope
Things change, Ghostlin. I don't love you anymore. However, if you admit to being scum I'll vote for you.
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 3:39 am
by thenewearth
Dafuq's with DP being replaced? No offense but I find that REALLY scummy
@Mod: any recent vote counts?
It'll have to wait, I'm writing an important essay for English right now.
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 5:24 am
by Bacde
I'm cool with lynching the Irish pope but no one seems to think that Ghostlin assuming there is a vengeful is scummy when in fact its a big deal and very scummy:
In post 270, Ghostlin wrote:Bacde, then how would you explain this?
In post 238, TheIrishPope wrote:It's alright to vote for me. If I get to L-1 then some shit may happen...
Remember this is a closed setup...
It's alright to vote for me. If I get to L-1 then some shit may happen...Remember this is a closed setup...
Not many powerroles WORK at L-1 that I'm aware. I misunderstood L-1 for hammered, but still, he's softclaiming something happens when he's at L-1
specifically
.
That's where my assumption came in.
I had assumed he meant he would claim his role, and to be honest, I had assumed he was crumbing a protective role. Why did you think he would be a vengeful townie? Thats a very specific and not very common power role and I'm having a hard time believing that you would have just randomly assumed him to be a vengeful townie.
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 5:34 am
by Ghostlin
In post 304, Bacde wrote:I'm cool with lynching the Irish pope but no one seems to think that Ghostlin assuming there is a vengeful is scummy when in fact its a big deal and very scummy:
In post 270, Ghostlin wrote:Bacde, then how would you explain this?
In post 238, TheIrishPope wrote:It's alright to vote for me. If I get to L-1 then some shit may happen...
Remember this is a closed setup...
It's alright to vote for me. If I get to L-1 then some shit may happen...Remember this is a closed setup...
Not many powerroles WORK at L-1 that I'm aware. I misunderstood L-1 for hammered, but still, he's softclaiming something happens when he's at L-1
specifically
.
That's where my assumption came in.
I had assumed he meant he would claim his role, and to be honest, I had assumed he was crumbing a protective role. Why did you think he would be a vengeful townie? Thats a very specific and not very common power role and I'm having a hard time believing that you would have just randomly assumed him to be a vengeful townie.
"If I get to L-1 then some shit may happen..." Says no one about their pending claim
EVER.
Bacde, there's no way anyone who just had a claim would say this. Granted, I jumped to a possibly faulty conclusion (thinking if he'd talk about his hammer, as I mentioned before) but even a town PR claim in this game would be fair from the drama in the quote. So I assumed something dramatic was being threatened to being happen. So far...it's not even worth the price of admission.
Secondly, you still vote for someone on what they did, not what roles they had. I've not jumped off of TIP's wagon due to the possible 'shit that may happen', even though if the shit's bad and nasty, I'll probably get caught in the fallout. That's how much I think TIP's bluffing scum.
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 7:14 am
by PimHel
So basically, Dr P didn't refute anything. I explained why his reads were fake at the start of the game. I didn't attack him for not voting. I attacked him for using that against another player. As said about 3, that point against Pope hadn't happened yet. And 5 was actually about that Dr P is scummy for saying Pope is scummy for not giving reads when he asked others to do so.
Vegito, you're scum. But the good news is that I want to lynch one of your suspicions (A) (You were suspicious of yourself XD)
@Ffery
I disagree with you about Jiffy sharing your reads = Jiffy-town.
Hamlet and theNE have posted very little. And Pope is the easy target this game.
If you don't believe me that it's easy to get this list, then you should ask other players where they stand with Hamlet, theNE and Pope.
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 7:32 am
by fferyllt
In post 306, PimHel wrote:@Ffery
I disagree with you about Jiffy sharing your reads = Jiffy-town.
I was being somewhat facetious about the town read. It is the first time ever that Majiffy's and my lists have lined up this closely, though. I usually have some major points of disagreement with his reads, whatever his alignment. I've played...8 or so games with him. two games here at MS.
I never assume Majiffy is town. I feel like Nacho is easier to read, but I got him wrong pretty badly once, which sullies an otherwise perfect multi-site record of figuring him out.
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 7:34 am
by fferyllt
maybe less than 8 games played with Majiffy. I was including a couple games I moderated
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 8:43 am
by Bacde
In post 305, Ghostlin wrote:"If I get to L-1 then some shit may happen..." Says no one about their pending claim EVER. Bacde, there's no way anyone who just had a claim would say this. Granted, I jumped to a possibly faulty conclusion (thinking if he'd talk about his hammer, as I mentioned before) but even a town PR claim in this game would be fair from the drama in the quote. So I assumed something dramatic was being threatened to being happen. So far...it's not even worth the price of admission.
Secondly, you still vote for someone on what they did, not what roles they had. I've not jumped off of TIP's wagon due to the possible 'shit that may happen', even though if the shit's bad and nasty, I'll probably get caught in the fallout. That's how much I think TIP's bluffing scum.
honestly TIP might be bluffing scum
but there's no good explanation for you thinking that he's a vengeful
L-1 is WAY different than a hammer, I would never see someone be like "At L-1 shit is going down" and think to myself "vengeful?"
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 11:44 am
by Ghostlin
In post 309, Bacde wrote:L-1 is WAY different than a hammer, I would never see someone be like "At L-1 shit is going down" and think to myself "vengeful?"
I already explained I mis thought (misread?) it as 'hammer', not 'L-1'.
Here's my problem with it.
1) You guys have already
lambasted
me back and forth for my earlier posting about not wanting to take the vote to L-1. TIP hypocritically uses the same crap and now you want to argue terms with me? It kind of pisses me off that he's getting a pass for softclaiming something will happen at L-1 when I didn't want someone to quickhammer or him self-hammering. Like I'm three shades away of calling you all fucking stupid.
2) TNE jumps off the wagon at the L-1 threat.
LITERALLY jumps off
. I may have been the first one to use 'vengeful' in the thread, but she treated the vote like something toxic was about to go down and there was a bomb planted across the street in the L-1 building.
3) If TIP has control over something that's negative at L-1, he's been fixed on me most of the day. Until his last post, I would of easily presumed I would of been the target of that something negative. Don't care. Think it's a scum bluff. If he does something to me, well, I'll take it like a man.
4) Again, no one talks about their claim as 'shit is about to go down.' NO ONE.
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 11:45 am
by Vegito
I'm gonna have to go ahead and disagree with you there.
You should vote Pope.
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 11:46 am
by Vegito
In post 310, Ghostlin wrote:4) Again, no one talks about their claim as 'shit is about to go down.' NO ONE.
Hated might soft about L-1 in that way, but... Pope is scum, so yeah.
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 11:47 am
by TheIrishPope
Well, my vote isn't on anyone for now. Ghostlin, I did not town PR claim...
And Vegito, I don't understand your reasons. If you're not voting Ghostlin for obvious reasons then you are scum.
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 11:51 am
by Ghostlin
In post 313, TheIrishPope wrote:Well, my vote isn't on anyone for now. Ghostlin, I did not town PR claim...
And Vegito, I don't understand your reasons. If you're not voting Ghostlin for obvious reasons then you are scum.
I didn't say you did. Rethink what normally happens at L-1. You normally claim then, right?
You implied shit was going to go down at L-1. I've never, EVER, played a mafia game where the claim reveal was so awesome it changed the tenor of the game, or made 'shit go down'. I've seen ones where scum GET LYNCHED for dumb claims, but that's not shit going down, that's business as usual.
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 11:56 am
by Vegito
In post 313, TheIrishPope wrote:Well, my vote isn't on anyone for now. Ghostlin, I did not town PR claim...
And Vegito, I don't understand your reasons. If you're not voting Ghostlin for obvious reasons then you are scum.
I have a town read on Ghostlin. Is that obvious enough?
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 12:01 pm
by TheIrishPope
Yeah, I see what you mean, Ghostlin. Some games are like that, some games are not. Oh well.
Vegito, state your reasons for voting me once again and you'll see the error of your ways.
Damn earrings. Y u no use Fusion Technique?
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 1:05 pm
by fferyllt
Hey Vegita, I'm hoping the Nacho head can come out and play too.
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 1:10 pm
by thenewearth
In post 313, TheIrishPope wrote:Well, my vote isn't on anyone for now. Ghostlin, I did not town PR claim...
And Vegito, I don't understand your reasons. If you're not voting Ghostlin for obvious reasons then you are scum.
Well your statement back then made me think otherwise
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 1:11 pm
by TheIrishPope
Think what you may, I have not claimed anything.
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 1:17 pm
by Vegito
In post 316, TheIrishPope wrote:Vegito, state your reasons for voting me once again and you'll see the error of your ways.
My ISO isn't that long. Probably less than 10 posts. How about you go check it yourself.
He sent me a PM today saying he forgot the password (for the second time in the past two weeks).
He should pop in eventually.
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 1:21 pm
by TheIrishPope
Well, that's lazy of you. Typing three sentences isn't even that hard.
Your posts are fucking walls of text. How can I possibly decipher them?
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 1:22 pm
by thenewearth
Oh you haven't?
Where's TIP at? L-2?
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 1:26 pm
by TheIrishPope
Haven't what? Claimed? I have not claimed. Quote me if I have.
Either L-2 or L-3
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 1:27 pm
by thenewearth
Well I'm waiting for that VC just to be sure