Page 13 of 266
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 2:21 am
by Benmage
unvote vote Andrius
Spreads arms wide, give me a fucking break.. Even the mods said you don't make a post restriction that restricts a persons ability to play. Hell fuckin no. And I haven't read the 12 pages... hoping its not dense at least.
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 2:55 am
by ooba
I can't elaborate on any reads - that's my post restriction!
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 3:08 am
by Benmage
^13 pages and we still wanna play RVS.
Good job Faraday
.
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 3:30 am
by Shadoweh
[quote="In [url=
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 0#p5323970]Also, do you have a read on shadoweh yet?[/quote]
In post 297, Alfred Borden wrote:
As far as Shadoweh goes, not really. Too early for it and I frankly don't trust my ability to read her.
This is why I can't have nice things. :< Also because watching Tammy go nuts is hilarious.
Quadz: By non-sequitors I mean your content is one liners that don't go anywhere. You're the mafia equivalent of "Nice weather we're having." Since this isn't helpful for a conversation though, have you considered if Andy was faking a post restriction he'd be more likely town, since scum tend towards being huge chickens who don't want to piss people off when they inevitably have to admit they can talk?
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 3:31 am
by Shadoweh
<_< 9am posting this is why I can't format nice things aaa FARADAY HELP
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 3:43 am
by PeaceBringer
[quote="In [url=http://www.mafiascum.n ... 1]post 297, Alfred Borden"]
As far as Shadoweh goes, not really. Too early for it and I frankly don't trust my ability to read her.[/quote]
This is why I can't have nice things. :< Also because watching Tammy go nuts is hilarious.
Quadz: By non-sequitors I mean your content is one liners that don't go anywhere. You're the mafia equivalent of "Nice weather we're having." Since this isn't helpful for a conversation though, have you considered if Andy was faking a post restriction he'd be more likely town, since scum tend towards being huge chickens who don't want to piss people off when they inevitably have to admit they can talk?[/quote]
something change around here over time I take it? faking post restrictions used to be a favored tactic for scum...
now faking a restriction and then backing it off another story...
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 3:55 am
by Garruk Relentless
In post 301, ooba wrote:
I can't elaborate on any reads - that's my post restriction!
But you can obviously quote people, so could you quote what parts of posts give you reads on those players?
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 3:55 am
by Garruk Relentless
In post 306, Garruk Relentless wrote: In post 301, ooba wrote:
I can't elaborate on any reads - that's my post restriction!
But you can obviously quote people, so could you quote what parts of posts give you reads on those players?
-SSK
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 4:12 am
by ooba
In post 306, Garruk Relentless wrote: In post 301, ooba wrote:
I can't elaborate on any reads - that's my post restriction!
But you can obviously quote people, so could you quote what parts of posts give you reads on those players?
I was joking SSK. The reads boil down to 'vibes' when I was reading the game.
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 4:32 am
by Nautilius
wuzzup
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 5:14 am
by Thor665
Oh sweet mercy, really?
Really?
13 pages since game start?
13 pages in about 18 hours?
Whilst I am in v/la times?
Yeah...
Claim
: Not reading all of that unless someone tells me something amazing happened during it.
oh, and also;
Claim
: Miller.
Boo-yah, now, thanks to site meta, basically I'm conf. town, in yo' faces, now I can be even *more* snarky than normal and get away with it.
In other news, who is the biggest wagon? I want to vote them.
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 5:15 am
by Thor665
Vote: elleheathen
I dun did good.
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 5:17 am
by Thor665
And I suppose I should clarify;
I'm only a Miller insomuch as I show up as guilty (or the equivalent used for this game) in regular cop investigations.
That means people who are not "regular cops" could still check me and I'll be town.
So, y'know, I'm an Innocent Child effect basically.
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 5:37 am
by Amrun
In post 303, Shadoweh wrote:ave you considered if Andy was faking a post restriction he'd be more likely town, since scum tend towards being huge chickens who don't want to piss people off when they inevitably have to admit they can talk?
Meet game history on this game series by this mod -- history says otherwise.
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 5:38 am
by Amrun
That being said, Andrius has struck me as town so far.
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 5:43 am
by elleheathen
So the claim is at least optimal play that coincides with what your playstyle is (at least in regards to not wanting to have to play under the radar) so then what's your flavor name?
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 6:08 am
by Benmage
Hey thor, got a question if your still at thread?
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 6:08 am
by Cephrir
In post 315, elleheathen wrote:
So the claim is at least optimal play that coincides with what your playstyle is (at least in regards to not wanting to have to play under the radar) so then what's your flavor name?
How will knowing this help anyone? It'll probably come out eventually.
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 6:08 am
by Benmage
In post 313, Amrun wrote: In post 303, Shadoweh wrote:ave you considered if Andy was faking a post restriction he'd be more likely town, since scum tend towards being huge chickens who don't want to piss people off when they inevitably have to admit they can talk?
Meet game history on this game series by this mod -- history says otherwise.
????????????????????????????????????
spread arms wide this mod, WOULD NEVER DO THIS POST RESTRICTION... WTF!
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 6:12 am
by Cephrir
In post 310, Thor665 wrote:Oh sweet mercy, really?
Really?
13 pages since game start?
13 pages in about 18 hours?
Whilst I am in v/la times?
Yeah...
Claim
: Not reading all of that unless someone tells me something amazing happened during it.
oh, and also;
Claim
: Miller.
Boo-yah, now, thanks to site meta, basically I'm conf. town, in yo' faces, now I can be even *more* snarky than normal and get away with it.
In other news, who is the biggest wagon? I want to vote them.
I don't actually like this very much. The refusal to read not-really-that-much given that you're a pretty analytical/careful player as well as the "lookit me I'm conftown" style of claiming miller.
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 6:26 am
by elleheathen
In post 317, Cephrir wrote: In post 315, elleheathen wrote:
So the claim is at least optimal play that coincides with what your playstyle is (at least in regards to not wanting to have to play under the radar) so then what's your flavor name?
How will knowing this help anyone? It'll probably come out eventually.
I'd like to see if it in any way would coincide with what flavor I'd expect a miller to be drawn from as my natural inclination is to suspect claims - especially when they come in with 'Fuck 18 pages, initiate RVS vote because I'm clearly conftown'.
But
VOTE: Cephrir
Because it should have been very obvious why I was asking - and not only that, what's the harm in asking the flavor name when he's revealed what his role is?
I only follow strength - or lead by example.
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 6:27 am
by Thor665
In post 315, elleheathen wrote:So the claim is at least optimal play that coincides with what your playstyle is (at least in regards to not wanting to have to play under the radar) so then what's your flavor name?
What does my flavor name have to do with the price of tea in China?
I wasn't.
Now I am.
Later I won't be.
I would normally just say 'ask the question and when I get back I'll nswer it' but I'll be honest, if there are another 13+ pages in 18 hours then I probably won't.
I am currently working a 10pm to 10:30am shift and go to sleep around 2-3pm all CST.
Feel free to try and catch me with this question whenever it will work for you since apparently it needs real world response time for maximum scumhuntage.
In post 319, Cephrir wrote:I don't actually like this very much. The refusal to read not-really-that-much given that you're a pretty analytical/careful player as well as the "lookit me I'm conftown" style of claiming miller.
I don't think you actually know my playstyle at all if you remotely think either behavior is unusual from me.
Hell, I do both when I have no logical reason to back up either decision other than ;aziness and pride respectively - I will certainly do them off v/la and role-verification at the drop of a hat.
Why do you think I wouldn't?
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 6:29 am
by Thor665
In post 320, elleheathen wrote:I'd like to see if it in any way would coincide with what flavor I'd expect a miller to be drawn from as my natural inclination is to suspect claims - especially when they come in with 'Smurf 18 pages, initiate RVS vote because I'm clearly conftown'.
Why, what did I miss in those 18 pages that I should have read?
I'm guessing it was all pretty boring.
What's the advantage?
I mean, other than to lynchers or something?
Because, at this point, your vague claim is 'I think Thor is too dumb to manage to have a fake name claim to go with his fake Miller claim if he's scum who decided to gambit Miller.
And to that I say - look at my win rate as scum and my join date and then stop trying to explain to your grandmother how to suck eggs.
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 6:35 am
by Cephrir
In post 320, elleheathen wrote: In post 317, Cephrir wrote: In post 315, elleheathen wrote:
So the claim is at least optimal play that coincides with what your playstyle is (at least in regards to not wanting to have to play under the radar) so then what's your flavor name?
How will knowing this help anyone? It'll probably come out eventually.
I'd like to see if it in any way would coincide with what flavor I'd expect a miller to be drawn from as my natural inclination is to suspect claims - especially when they come in with 'Fuck 18 pages, initiate RVS vote because I'm clearly conftown'.
But
VOTE: Cephrir
Because it should have been very obvious why I was asking - and not only that, what's the harm in asking the flavor name when he's revealed what his role is?
I only follow strength - or lead by example.
1. It is decidedly not obvious.
2. He's probably not *just* a miller.
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 6:37 am
by Cephrir
In post 321, Thor665 wrote:
In post 319, Cephrir wrote:I don't actually like this very much. The refusal to read not-really-that-much given that you're a pretty analytical/careful player as well as the "lookit me I'm conftown" style of claiming miller.
I don't think you actually know my playstyle at all if you remotely think either behavior is unusual from me.
Hell, I do both when I have no logical reason to back up either decision other than ;aziness and pride respectively - I will certainly do them off v/la and role-verification at the drop of a hat.
Why do you think I wouldn't?
The former can be explained by me not really understanding your playstyle. The latter, eh, not so much. I wasn't saying especially that I don't like *you* doing the latter, I wouldn't like anyone for doing that.
Just from impressions I have of you (both recent and long past) you don't seem like the type to not read threads, but I could be wrong.