Mafiascum.net

In post 288, Kazekirimaru wrote:Uhh...? I don't like to self-meta analyze. That's kinda silly.

I guess any of them really cause I'm generally an aggressive scumhunter.

It was a trick question, I guess. I had already meta'd you when I asked that. Your play so far here doesn't really fit with what I saw in your other games. Your stances looked pretty logical and thoughtful in the games I read this morning.

Kay. So, you're insinuating that I'm acting illogical this game.

Alright.

Or perhaps you're saying I'm not playing thoughtful enough?

Is this a caution or an accusation?

Hey kaze you pretty much got your wish
VOTE: Kazekirimaru

I wasn't getting defensive i was pointing out facts. Also wtf I have been doing more than just reacting I went for NS that you said yourself hypocrite much. That's called scum hunting Kaze. Your vote on me was a obvious chainsaw lets have look. at your reason

In post 256, Kazekirimaru wrote:I think I'm going to

VOTE: Garmr

All they're really done is berate ns this game.

Seriously your reason for voting me is because I been focusing on one person for my votes. Because I Don't jump on to bandwagon I don't think are scummy. But hey I have gave my opinions of them at least. You seem to be way more defensive than any of my responses anyway and your the one on the attack isn't that strange.

(out of context.)On a side note i should really stop playing favorites with my mafia games and treat them all equal.

DON'T TALK ABOUT YOUR OTHER ONGOING GAMES

In post 301, Kazekirimaru wrote:Kay. So, you're insinuating that I'm acting illogical this game.

Alright.

Your stances don't appear make as much sense, no.

In post 302, Kazekirimaru wrote:Or perhaps you're saying I'm not playing thoughtful enough?

Is this a caution or an accusation?

It was mostly curiosity, because I wondered which game you would maybe see as most like your play in this one.

This doesn't look as much like your town games as I was kinda expecting.

In post 270, Kazekirimaru wrote:(Bonus style points if Garmr votes me after this post.)

In post 303, Garmr wrote:VOTE: Kazekirimaru

Good job. I knew you wouldn't let me down!

But yeah if Garmr were OMGUSing any harder he'd be driving up here and slapping me in the face with his dick.

My goodness.

In post 307, Kazekirimaru wrote:But yeah if Garmr were OMGUSing any harder he'd be driving up here and

slapping me in the face with his dick.

My goodness.

Kaze I thought you said we'd keep that quite

Do people really even consider OMGUS a scumtell anymore (/again)?

quiet

Damn i was ninjaed with out being able to respond correct.

In post 309, Plum wrote:Do people really even consider OMGUS a scumtell anymore (/again)?

Read some recent games and come to your own conclusions?

In post 312, Kazekirimaru wrote:

In post 309, Plum wrote:Do people really even consider OMGUS a scumtell anymore (/again)?

Read some recent games and come to your own conclusions?

Why would you not just answer


Plum, OMGUS is certainly bad, but sometimes townies are bad. All about deciphering intent.

@kaze It's not really Omgus when your being so scummy about it. Also your using OMGUS wrong because I do have reasons for voting you. A OMGUS vote is to describe outrage as the reason for why someone voted them I had valid reasons before i actually voted.

What the fuck good is my answer when I'm the one calling it a scum tell? A. My answer is obvious and B. My answer is biased.

In post 314, Garmr wrote:@kaze It's not really Omgus when your being so scummy about it. Also your using OMGUS wrong because I do have reasons for voting you. A OMGUS vote is to describe outrage as the reason for why someone voted them I had valid reasons before i actually voted.

There's more to Mafia than just Wikipedia definitions. You're so adorable.

In post 312, Kazekirimaru wrote:

In post 309, Plum wrote:Do people really even consider OMGUS a scumtell anymore (/again)?

Read some recent games and come to your own conclusions?

It was less a serious question than a way of asking what if any relevant information you can find based merely on the fact that Garmr voted you back. You seem to be saying that in itself is an important, relevant fact in your case/stance against Garmr. Uh, really?

I keep getting ninja'd, but still - really?

In post 315, Kazekirimaru wrote:What the fuck good is my answer when I'm the one calling it a scum tell? A. My answer is obvious and B. My answer is biased.

Then why even answer

Reading through the thread now.

In post 317, Plum wrote: It was less a serious question than a way of asking what if any relevant information you can find based merely on the fact that Garmr voted you back. You seem to be saying that in itself is an important, relevant fact in your case/stance against Garmr. Uh, really?

I keep getting ninja'd, but still - really?

His vote was clearly influenced by my prior vote on him. He was practically inactive until I voted him. Not only did he get offended, he all of a sudden pegged me as his #1 scumread after I voted him. Convenient, no? How are you not seeing this yourself? Uh, really?

You people blow my mind.

In post 320, Kazekirimaru wrote:#1 scumread

Garmr please address

Wait he said ns too.

So #1 or #2 either way.

Oh I wonder if Garmr is gonna say what I think he's gonna say

What when did I say you were my number one scum read after voting me. I did say theory 1 you and NS are a scum team due to your defense of her. But that was theory not me saying you were my number 1 scum read. The way you chainsawed is extremely suspicious.