Mafiascum.net

Liking Ira alot and agree w/ almost everything he's said about transcend.

0_0

*takes out a jackknife and trades it with jarjar's stomach*

In post 266, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 263, JarJarDrinks wrote:And Something_Smart looks scummy too. He posts a readslist and the immediately says they're weak meta reads after getting challenged by Dunn and Trans. Why not mention that initially?

Why mention it initially? I got some interesting reactions.

So now you're saying that the reads were a reaction test? I guess now my question is: why not mention THAT until just now?

In post 269, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 261, JarJarDrinks wrote:not a fan of mathblades page 6

- Voting Dunn is terrible.
- as is townreading Gamma
- Defending transcend AND creature! WTF?

Do you have me as null or scum?

null

I never said it was a reaction test. Every single thing anyone says produces reactions; doesn't mean everything is a reaction test.

Answer my question, then. Why should I have mentioned it initially?

In post 271, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 265, JarJarDrinks wrote:I'm not scumreading anyone for disagreeing w/ me. I'm scumreading people for having garbage reads that they shouldn't have.

So you're scumreading people for strongly disagreeing with you?

No. And as I said, I'm just pointing out scumminess where I see it.

My reads are generally good. Therefore when someone attacks my scumreads, I give them townie points. When they attack my townreads, they get scumpoints.

Yes obviously town can have bad reads. One of the points of the game is figuring out if those people are scum or bad town.

In post 272, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also it's early in the day JarJar reads aregonna be garbage anyways

speak 4 urself

LOL I haven't given any solid reads JarJar.

In post 275, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 263, JarJarDrinks wrote:Not crazy about XnadrojX. His posts feel like alot of faking noobiness.

In post 274, JarJarDrinks wrote:

In post 176, Transcend wrote: @jordan i have a hard time believing that was a reaction test and you were satisfied with his reaction

but i'm not voting you since i have a feeling you might be town

OK I like this post cause it was pretty much my exact thought.

If Xnad is trying to fake noob-town, he's convincing me.

Did you switch your read here or am I misunderstanding something?

Yes that's exactly what I'm saying w/ the second post.

jarjar are you from nyc

In post 306, JarJarDrinks wrote:

In post 271, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 265, JarJarDrinks wrote:I'm not scumreading anyone for disagreeing w/ me. I'm scumreading people for having garbage reads that they shouldn't have.

So you're scumreading people for strongly disagreeing with you?

No. And as I said, I'm just pointing out scumminess where I see it.

My reads are generally good. Therefore when someone attacks my scumreads, I give them townie points. When they attack my townreads, they get scumpoints.

Yes obviously town can have bad reads. One of the points of the game is figuring out if those people are scum or bad town.

But you haven't done any of that so far, and when you use whose reads agree with yours as your main scumhunting tool, it seems weak at best to me.

@Infinity

I don't know what else I can say 2 u that I haven't. I think you're probably town so I don't really want to continue arguing w/ you about my playstyle except to say I've been incredibly successful with it in all my previous games.

If you have anything specific you'd like to talk to me about then I'm game.

In post 300, JarJarDrinks wrote:Liking Ira alot and agree w/ almost everything he's said about transcend.

i'm determined to get myself out of this hole

Reads are not alignment indicative.
How they change and what you do with them is.

In post 312, JarJarDrinks wrote:@Infinity

I don't know what else I can say 2 u that I haven't. I think you're probably town so I don't really want to continue arguing w/ you about my playstyle except to say I've been incredibly successful with it in all my previous games.

If you have anything specific you'd like to talk to me about then I'm game.

Somehow I doubt that.

At least give some depth to your reads ok?

Yeah, good scum doesn't exist.

In post 226, iraonavp wrote:

In post 223, Transcend wrote:i can't read iraon i kinda think he's town but

I DEMAND HE GETS VIGGED TONIGHT

VOTE: Creature

Just backing off since he knows policy vote looks bad.

Also, more proof he is not vigilante...

Can't tell if your serious?

I am not liking Gamma, and JarJar right now but Dunn and infinity seem pretty cool

JarJar looks town, but I don't know how he plays scum.

In post 305, Something_Smart wrote:I never said it was a reaction test. Every single thing anyone says produces reactions; doesn't mean everything is a reaction test.

Total misdirection

I asked you why you made those reads knowing that they were just non-serious meta reads. YOU were the one that answered that question saying that U "got some interesting reactions". So obviously you're implying that the reads were made to gauge reactions.

In post 305, Something_Smart wrote:Answer my question, then. Why should I have mentioned it initially?

Cause if ur town, there's no good reason to hide stuff (most of the time).

And you haven't actually answered me since you're now saying it wasn't a reaction test.

In post 310, Zachstralkita wrote:jarjar are you from nyc

not any more. I'm like 40 miles upstate.

JarJarDrinks wrote:

In post 310, Zachstralkita wrote:jarjar are you from nyc

not any more. I'm like 40 miles upstate.

I used to live in the Bronx

VOTE: AlpacaAlpaca

Good night.

Let's

Bump