Mafiascum.net

In post 297, Gustavo wrote:

In post 296, JarJarDrinks wrote:I don't really get the issue here. Forcing people to take a stance and put their opinions out there is kinda what you do in mafia.

agreed. It does strike me weird he is questioning somebody he town reads but it's not anything I haven't seen before.

I like to solidify town reads early if possible. If I can come out of Day 1 with 1 or 2 hard town reads I’m happy. So I like to question town reads as much as scum reads. I don’t usually find hard TRS Day 1.

I thought SS might fit the bill.

I don’t understand why this is concerning anyone tbh. It’s pretty standard practice in my opinion.

Everyone has different ways to play.

Tex strikes me as a passive player by style, since she's so blatantly passive in a way that I don't think scum would be - she's clearly following the game, developing thoughts (e.g. the post about Bacy/BBT, and the one analyzing my response to Invisibility). It's a weak townread because there's just not much there, and it largely depends on how Text starts playing later.

Jodax is town because her posts show a clear thought process about the game, she's actively scumhunting, and there's some depth to her thoughts.

Bacy's the strongest of those townreads. Everything she's done has been pro-town, from first post to last - she hasn't distorted anything in the game, her analysis is strong, her questions mirror my own.

BBT is also a townread.

HF, despite playing poorly, is also a townread. I read some of his scum games and his tone felt very different from here, so that's sort of a meta/tone read. Frustrating, because he's blatantly misreading me, but whatever. His win/loss record reflects his poor reading comprehension skills, I suppose.

shoshin feeling better

I haven't seen any questions aimed at me in the last few pages, so here's my prodge:

I getting a vibe from texcat that she'll be easier to sort as the game goes forward and more substantial info comes up. Nullreading her for now.
I think BBT should reveal his townread. Since the only posters between 64 and 71 are me, bacy and Invisibility, I'm guessing it's bacy, but it would be nice to get official confirmation.

Lynchplan:
VOTE: Invisibility
2. havingfitz
3. Shoshin
4. Gustavo

In post 306, Garuga wrote:I haven't seen any questions aimed at me in the last few pages, so here's my prodge:

I getting a vibe from texcat that she'll be easier to sort as the game goes forward and more substantial info comes up. Nullreading her for now.
I think BBT should reveal his townread. Since the only posters between 64 and 71 are me, bacy and Invisibility, I'm guessing it's bacy, but it would be nice to get official confirmation.

Lynchplan:
VOTE: Invisibility
2. havingfitz
3. Shoshin
4. Gustavo

Interesting. Why Invisibility?

In post 307, Mumble wrote:

In post 306, Garuga wrote:I haven't seen any questions aimed at me in the last few pages, so here's my prodge:

I getting a vibe from texcat that she'll be easier to sort as the game goes forward and more substantial info comes up. Nullreading her for now.
I think BBT should reveal his townread. Since the only posters between 64 and 71 are me, bacy and Invisibility, I'm guessing it's bacy, but it would be nice to get official confirmation.

Lynchplan:
VOTE: Invisibility
2. havingfitz
3. Shoshin
4. Gustavo

Interesting. Why Invisibility?

He's not providing clear arguments for his reads. His "what?" trilogy (151 153 155) is probably the best example, along with the (19 23 28) trio early on.

In post 308, Garuga wrote:He's not providing clear arguments for his reads. His "what?" trilogy (151 153 155) is probably the best example, along with the (19 23 28) trio early on.

So why naked vote him (essentially doing what you are scum reading him for) instead of asking him to clarify?

Because I see an alternative reason for your vote...

Wait...what? You were already voting him. Why did you vote the same slot again?

In post 309, Mumble wrote:

In post 308, Garuga wrote:He's not providing clear arguments for his reads. His "what?" trilogy (151 153 155) is probably the best example, along with the (19 23 28) trio early on.

So why naked vote him (essentially doing what you are scum reading him for) instead of asking him to clarify?

Because I see an alternative reason for your vote...

I was already voting him since 48. I don't think this sort of posting comes from town trying to solve the game. I think it's newbscum trying to discredit me since I voted havingfitz, and Invis's reaction is actually one of the main reasons I scumread HF.

The re-vote confirms my read on him and makes my post a bit more flavorful.

Um...I'm not new? The re-vote is ridiculous and confusing (especially since I'm having a time differentiating you and Gustavo).

However, you didn't answer my question about clarification, and instead try to throw shade on me for a really weak reason.

VOTE: Garuga

Why does your lynch plan have the other three names on it?

In post 312, Mumble wrote:Um...I'm not new? The re-vote is ridiculous and confusing (especially since I'm having a time differentiating you and Gustavo).

However, you didn't answer my question about clarification, and instead try to throw shade on me for a really weak reason.

VOTE: Garuga

By "him", I was referring to Invis, not you.

In post 314, Garuga wrote:By "him", I was referring to Invis, not you.

I got that. The following sentence was referring to my posting.

So, assuming the entirety of that was directed at Invisibility (unclear, but I'll assume), I agree with the points he made on you at the time. You feel like you're scum reading him because he voted you.

I think my vote is better served here for the moment.

VOTE: TheRampage

In post 313, texcat wrote:Why does your lynch plan have the other three names on it?

I think havingfitz is scum in association with Invis, I think Sho is scum due to her attacking TheRampage earlier on and I don't like her exchange back in 251, I think Gustavo ignored 22 in 237.

It was entirely directed at Invis, yes. And yes, his vote seems quite suspicious when I factor in the follow-up posts 23 28.

In post 318, Garuga wrote:I think Gustavo ignored 22 in 237.

I didn’t ignore it. Your explanation doesn’t make any sense. The point of the game is to find and lynch scum. If you see something suspicious you pressure it. You didn’t do that which means you aren’t trying to find scum.

"what" is the scummiest four letter combination known to man

in fact VOTE: Garuga for 308 just being generally an awful post

@Garuga

explain ur havingfitz scumread to me please.

In post 322, JarJarDrinks wrote:@Garuga

explain ur havingfitz scumread to me please.

This game has been frustrating. Nobody reads ISOs, apparently.

I'm the , my current plan is to end up dead after prodging my way through D1. This PR isn't really that useful outside of LyLo, anyways. It's quite unlikely my reads will change, and since nobody has any interest in them, I'd rather just get NKed instead of a charismatic townie or a PR.

I'm confused why u felt that me asking you to explain a read meant that u should claim?