Mafiascum.net

In post 299, Akarin wrote:That said, this is the scummiest thing about how the Shortaru wagon dissolved:

In post 64, Creature wrote:

In post 57, shortaru wrote:

In post 54, Creature wrote:

In post 3, shortaru wrote:First!

VOTE: Fuwa Fuwa Time

First vote in the first post goes to the first player listed.

Too scummy post

Where's your vote?

When I finish catching up

In post 77, Creature wrote:

In post 63, shortaru wrote:Oh noes!

Not liking these

In post 174, Creature wrote:

In post 83, ThoseInCharge wrote:Creature, why no vote?

idk who to vote, man

If Shortaru is town, Creature is pushing the wagon without actually committing to it and jumping on in one of the more suspicious wagon positions.
If Shortaru is scum, Creature is set up to bus him if it looks inevitable.
Either way, VOTE: Creature

If you think THAT is enough for a vote, how is 138 not enough for a vote?

It's a better case.

Also, I'm trying to find a way to say this nicely and not repeat myself from a few posts ago, but please don't try to establish a meta of being unhelpful.

Nah.

And that's not at all what I said.

In post 301, Akarin wrote:It's a

way

better case.

The reason your case is inferior is because you are judging those posts in a vacuum, ignoring everything else that was going on in the game.

There is no missing context from my case. Thor flat out another I was right.

admitted*

OwO short puts effort in defending himself tho

What is OwO

O W O

it's a kitty face

In post 281, Thor665 wrote:

In post 278, Gamma Emerald wrote:Well I’m not anticipating you doing research, because why would you? And what research have you done anyway?

I lost interest in discussing stuff with you about the time you claimed I would have no recent meta on you after agreeing my meta conclusion was right and being aware we do have recent interactions that could easily lead to me having more recent meta awareness of you. Also, when you said that Shortaru's case on me had merit.
You're not dealing with this conversation honestly.

I don’t think you’re approaching this honestly if the second you’re forced to provide specific backing for your read you clam up.
VOTE: Thor

Actually not a fan of 308.

Thor doesn't strike me at all as the type to clam up regardless of alignment.

Gamma, if Thor's meta on you is accurate, what's your beef?

In post 294, Akarin wrote:Am I actually being crazy here?

Also what's up with this?

Probably. In hindsight, if I was given the exact same PM as my predecessor, than it could make sense (in one game, Mastina gave me every role related PM that was sent between my predecessor and herself when I replaced in, and I could also see the case where a moderator would include the name of the recipient with area tags). However, in most cases, I generally only expect to see teammates' names in Role PM's, so my natural reaction to your question is that they would not see their own name listed.

They're two different things.

In post 309, shortaru wrote:Actually not a fan of 308.

Thor doesn't strike me at all as the type to clam up regardless of alignment.

Gamma, if Thor's meta on you is accurate, what's your beef?

My beef is that it was not accurate from his perspective as I thought it at the start of this game, and when he was asked to prove it made sense, he suddenly gets uppity about me not being honest. Which I think I might have his ass on actually.

Hm
Recalled something wrong, I thought among his list of meta theories was one about not interacting with scumreads being stupid

akarin town too
list keeps growing, thats good

TIC is still scum and we should be lynching them.

Wait so is it Celestial Coordinates or RC or what

In post 295, Akarin wrote:

In post 293, Thor665 wrote: Never called them a strong town read.

They're a town read for being productive and aggressive in thread during RVS.

And that's worth sheeping and asking others to sheep you on?

At that stage of the game, absolutely.
I've also, since then, offered up non-sheep reasons for people to go with the wagon.
Where do you see the issue here? Do I need a "strong" RVS town read to sheep someone? I disagree rather aggressively - the entire concept of RVS is that you take mild reads and behave like they're strong to advance the game.

In post 308, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 281, Thor665 wrote:

In post 278, Gamma Emerald wrote:Well I’m not anticipating you doing research, because why would you? And what research have you done anyway?

I lost interest in discussing stuff with you about the time you claimed I would have no recent meta on you after agreeing my meta conclusion was right and being aware we do have recent interactions that could easily lead to me having more recent meta awareness of you. Also, when you said that Shortaru's case on me had merit.
You're not dealing with this conversation honestly.

I don’t think you’re approaching this honestly if the second you’re forced to provide specific backing for your read you clam up.
VOTE: Thor

Since I already said [redacted] in conversation with you and sine you KNOW what that means you trying to claim that me not explicitly disccussing stuff you know is against site rules to discuss and trying to twist it into a scum case on me is utter scum play.
I'm lock voted now.



Please read my last post to Gamma and vote appropriately.
They just scum claimed.
I'll slow walk you through it if you somehow don't get it, but everyone should be scumreading that slot now.

In post 317, Thor665 wrote:Since I already said [redacted] in conversation with you and sine you KNOW what that means you trying to claim that me not explicitly disccussing stuff you know is against site rules to discuss and trying to twist it into a scum case on me is utter scum play.

Regardless of your alignment, I don't care for the use of non-game content being used in this manner. [Redacted] and similar things are angle shooting and shouldn't even be brought into the discussion at all because it goes against the spirit of the site rules.

(I'm using the ooc tags because this post is not relevant to the game at hand other than to note a personal objection to the way it is being played)

That said,

VOTE: Gamma

I'm just disappointed in how this conclusion was reached.

Method matters.

In post 206, RadiantCowbells wrote:uh

creature is town

i'm good at this game

I did notging though

Wait you're playing the game?

In post 208, RadiantCowbells wrote:VOTE: TIC

just read the game this is transparently scum

Who is TIC?

Damn right now I could be stomping this game

But today had to be fucking thursday

I don't fully understand what happened here...