Mafiascum.net

In post 290, sheepsaysmeep wrote:why is a 1 poster being wagoned

can you two talk about your votes there

gotta get people to contribute something meaningful before the deadl....


oh wait

Thanks.


BUT WHY, SHEEP, WHY AM I A WOLF TO YOU?

because potato

In post 290, sheepsaysmeep wrote:why is a 1 poster being wagoned

can you two talk about your votes there

In post 233, Jaylow7 wrote:So this has started...

I will in general be most active on the weekends until the end of the year. The holiday season is always super busy for me.

No real reads yet except one, not much of note has been said beyond the neighborhood claim and recent setup spec discussion, by the same person...

who is the one person I have a solid read on right now.

VOTE: Varsoon

This post seems scummy to me. He first starts off letting us know how busy he is - not generally a good sign but NAI by itself and has a “solid” read on” - after just 1 post? And then, he just conveniently disappears without ever explaining his vote? This is way more likely to come from scum than town, because town prefers to engage and question a bit before throwing down an unexplained vote. It’s a gross vote, no matter how you look at it.

In post 293, Vaxkiller wrote:VOTE: sheepsaysmeep

In post 295, Vaxkiller wrote:No.

No reason really.

I'm starting to read now.

Could vote here too, this is a bad vote.

Still, less scummy than Jaylow, because it lacks pretentiousness. Scum usually aren’t transparent like this but if the vote doesn’t move or get explained, I would reassess.

In post 287, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 232, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 180, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 169, xyzzy wrote:

sheepsaysmeep replaces Porkens.

YEEET

Oh good, it looks like Cheeky may have been right on Porkens.

Liking Cheeky, sheep and Brie so far I think.

wat

Which part?

In post 305, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 287, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 232, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 180, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 169, xyzzy wrote:

sheepsaysmeep replaces Porkens.

YEEET

Oh good, it looks like Cheeky may have been right on Porkens.

Liking Cheeky, sheep and Brie so far I think.

wat

Which part?

Cheeky being right on porkens

In post 305, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 287, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 232, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 180, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 169, xyzzy wrote:

sheepsaysmeep replaces Porkens.

YEEET

Oh good, it looks like Cheeky may have been right on Porkens.

Liking Cheeky, sheep and Brie so far I think.

wat

Which part?

Cheeky townread Porkens, who was sheep’s predessor and I think sheep is town here.

but sheep hadn't posted then......

ok he had
but like that's super fast of you and you haven't played with them before, wut

In post 309, Gamma Emerald wrote:but sheep hadn't posted then......

No, the point is that Cheeky townread Porkens, who I had a null read on and he was replaced by sheep, who I’m currently townreading. So, Cheeky was likely right on sheep’s predessor - Porkens.

In post 310, Gamma Emerald wrote:ok he had
but like that's super fast of you and you haven't played with them before, wut

Yes I have, numerous times on MU.

In post 312, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 310, Gamma Emerald wrote:ok he had
but like that's super fast of you and you haven't played with them before, wut

Yes I have, numerous times on MU.

I have correctly read him in the last several games we’ve played together. He is tonally very different as scum, than he is as town.

ok

In post 301, Leodanny wrote:Thanks.


BUT WHY, SHEEP, WHY AM I A WOLF TO YOU?

throughout reading i sort of watched you pop in a few times and feel fairly relaxed in thread and interacting with people but like

posting very surface level and it didnt feel like there was really any solving going on? and usually when i have these reads i conclude that that type of iso is twtbw but it doesnt really cross that line for me

In post 290, sheepsaysmeep wrote:why is a 1 poster being wagoned

can you two talk about your votes there

I was just gonna say GUT but you should prob read what nancy wrote about the post instead

sure it's just one post but also it's the worst post in the game so far

In post 317, Gammagooey wrote:

In post 290, sheepsaysmeep wrote:why is a 1 poster being wagoned

can you two talk about your votes there

I was just gonna say GUT but you should prob read what nancy wrote about the post instead

sure it's just one post but also it's the worst post in the game so far

dis me

Im here sorry about inactivity catching up now

In post 265, sheepsaysmeep wrote:that doesnt actually confirm multiball in any way?

it's very technical but that could be translated as "members of any potentially existing opposing factions"

You do realise that things like Serial killer are 1 man factions right?

In post 320, 0verki11 wrote:

In post 265, sheepsaysmeep wrote:that doesnt actually confirm multiball in any way?

it's very technical but that could be translated as "members of any potentially existing opposing factions"

You do realise that things like Serial killer are 1 man factions right?

this feels like an unhelpful conversation ot have rn anywayas but

yeah i do, and i dont see why this matters?

meh i disagree with nancy's reasons on jaylow

i can see where youre coming from but it feels a lot more just like an activity problem

In post 205, hebichan wrote:

In post 202, vonflare wrote:

In post 189, Varsoon wrote:Basically it completely throws a wrench in the rationale we can give for why someone is scum or not because each scum team can just fucking hunt the other instead

this post me no likey

Why? Seems kinda unrelated to the game on hand.

scum mentality

Why