In post 287, Asking for a friend wrote:This meme is kinda directed towards certain individuals in a hood but I want everyone to see this art
(note that some people's names are here mostly because of playstyle clashes and/or interactions that will probably happen)
I feel left out.
Elena Fisher wrote:
In post 65, Torque wrote:I like the fact A50 claiming he's not speaking in channels actually I think scum will just lurk and not claim so
Not talking in a channel is towny, but not for the reason already stated. It's easier to pocket people in neighborhoods than it is a whole thread of people. You have to play to a certain group of people in a hood that's easier to do then the whole game. It also gives the benefit of if you do pocket them and still get lynched they look bad by association.
I’d say you’re shit at reading me but you haven’t been Town with me in a while so I don’t know what the actual level is there
I don't understand why Dunn called your 2 posts in question scummy. Mostly because I don't think they're that scummy. However, this reaction (or should I say overreaction,) is. He called 2 NAI posts scummy and you come back with something like this. No no. VOTE: Gamma
In post 151, Morality wrote:If I was scum/SK, I’d have claimed it in my first post, instead I actually talked about some of my thoughts and insight on the play that Almost50.
VOTE: BNL
This seems like a forced push.
This push doesn't seem forced to me at all. The first line you talk about is some self meta that you think we should just magically know. You made a basic post about A50 like that should be towny. It wasn't at all.
So why is this push forced?
Could you explain more why not posting in said channel in channels is scummy, I feel its the exact opposite.
really you should be happy because most if not all of those names are the reason why this game is gonna be a dramafulled clusterfuck and its the reason why I want 0 part in day 1.
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2019 7:13 pm
by Morality
I like to look at people’s trajectories, and the string of their actions combined rather than just one. This is what I meant by add up. One action might not be scummy in its own right, but in conjunction with other actions, even a townie play can end up seeming incredibly scum motivated. I can see a lot of “scummy” play coming from a town sided mindset, which inadvertently makes that type of play townie by default, which is why a group of actions that are incredibly NAI, mixed in with nothing “scummy” comes off as scum playing really well. I’ve been wrong with pushing this in the past, however, it’s generally when I’m a little overconfident with reading specific players. Generally, that’s what I meant when i said add up. Pretty basic stuff, but I believe the string of actions connected is often overlooked in favor of individual actions.
I remember you because we both have strong personalities, and generally go after each other at one point during the game. Most of the time, I play with accounts of yours and don’t even realize that the account is you until after the game is over, which shows me that it’s just our playstyles that mesh like that. It’s interesting, as we’ve both locked onto each other and
knew
that the other was scum. To be fair, I don’t remember a lot of our games together, only 1 or 2 come to mind, and frankly, even those aren’t too memorable when thinking about us playing together.
You’re right; I shouldn’t have assumed he would know that tiny detail. I myself only recently figured out I have a tendency to do that as scum. However, BNL has recently been around ScumMe multiple times, and town me. This includes a game he has modded. I’m considering recently the past 6 months. It isn’t that I thought he should have town read the post, I just don’t believe he should scum read that. It’s NAI at best. I didn’t have a string posted yet so he could tie things together either. He literally based it off of that one post, which I don’t believe he would gather a read from it, at least not with the flare he projected.
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2019 7:14 pm
by Morality
In response to Elena’s breakdown. ^ I didn’t think quoting was necessary, as my post is big enough.
really you should be happy because most if not all of those names are the reason why this game is gonna be a dramafulled clusterfuck and its the reason why I want 0 part in day 1.
In fact, I made preparations as to make sure I don't play mafia day 1 but then tw started feeling not so swell.
I do need to maintain those "things" so to speak tho
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2019 7:17 pm
by Chito and Yuuri
Elena, do you not believe that my partner believes that that's a list of people who posted on page 7? Or do you believe that scum would stoop so low as to break the rrrrrrrrurus?
-Yuuri
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2019 7:20 pm
by Asking for a friend
In post 306, Chito and Yuuri wrote:Elena, do you not believe that my partner believes that that's a list of people who posted on page 7? Or do you believe that scum would stoop so low as to break the rrrrrrrrurus?
-Yuuri
I have no way to 1-up this meme
instead I will repost a seperate meme
PPE: You knew you were wrong and said it anyway
(Are these all watermarked, I've now officially put way too much time into trying to find one without the watermark)
Alisae wrote:Is Creature Town Checklist
Is Creature Active?
Is Creature doing his usual stream of consciousness posting?
Is Creature confident in his towniness?
Is Creature taking the easy outs on his reads (IE Obvtown town, lynchbaits consensus scum)?
If the answer to the first 3 is yes and the last 1 is no, then he is town.
Let's address the first thing on the checklist.
Is he active? Answer: No he has 40 posts.
Is Creature doing his usual stream of consciousness posting? Answer: No he has 40 posts.
Is Creature confident in his towniness? Answer: No. 1684 does not read as confident to me. 1709 does not read out as confident to me (in fact it reads as defeatist)
Is Creature taking the easy outs in his reads? Based on a skim on his ISO it sure does look like it to me.
VOTE: Spike and Jet
NO CREATURE POSTS
ITS A LYNCH
ITS A LYNCH
I never thought I would see such a reply to this its actually kinda shocking.
A. He has made 0 posts in this thread today. This kinda just speaks for itself.
B. The Data that was used to create this checklist date backs to Civ mafia (Nahdia). That Checklist was basically a good way of reading creature ALL of 2017, and it was good 50-60% of 2018 (or in shorter terms, while I was palying in 2018). There's no reason for it to be not good now.
C. KNOWING you know how Creature plays, this defense is REALLY telling.
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2019 9:40 pm
by Near x Mello
neh, creature has improved
And spike's robert defense was so weird that im struggling to see it as scum
~Near
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2019 9:45 pm
by Near x Mello
In post 283, Robert2424 wrote:So every game, I'm going to vote for people who do that, and highly question them.
If that's the case why didnt you question us about our vote?