Mafiascum.net

In post 286, Menalque wrote:let us all remember the parable of the warmpupper who was wrongly maligned for having a governor shot

The objective best response to that situation would have been for you to lynch in Fire's pool and then FF to vig him at night.

Hands down, as mod, including governor at all was a shitty choice I made. Making it EVEN MORE scumsided was the worst choice I made in the entire game that people spent 3 phases complaining about how bad the design was. I own that. Trust me when I say that the only thing a righteous mayor would do here is throw that governor lynch in the garbage.

Here's the thing. Lynching >>> No Lynching, outside of very specific situations. In those situations, WE CAN STILL VOTE TO NO LYNCH.

In post 295, Iconeum wrote:extra no lynch = extra cult recruit option

the role is strictly anti-town

Unless that means Cult attempts to recruit scum with that extra and the Leader dies

In post 295, Iconeum wrote:extra no lynch = extra cult recruit option

the role is strictly anti-town

yeah but like

the competition is a listmod

a filthy, privilege abusing, pagetop stealing listmod (not UT specifically of course, but all listmods)

I know you abhor their kind, dragon. we've talked about your campaign before

vote me for governor and enjoy their disappointment!

In post 300, Bingle wrote:

In post 286, Menalque wrote:let us all remember the parable of the warmpupper who was wrongly maligned for having a governor shot

The objective best response to that situation would have been for you to lynch in Fire's pool and then FF to vig him at night.

Hands down, as mod, including governor at all was a shitty choice I made. Making it EVEN MORE scumsided was the worst choice I made in the entire game that people spent 3 phases complaining about how bad the design was. I own that. Trust me when I say that the only thing a righteous mayor would do here is throw that governor lynch in the garbage.

Here's the thing. Lynching >>> No Lynching, outside of very specific situations. In those situations, WE CAN STILL VOTE TO NO LYNCH.

yes but do I get the power trip of knowing that I can theoretically stop any given throughout and ENTIRE GAME if we just get rid of the governor shot

it's like you're not speaking my language at all fam

In post 122, Bingle wrote:Congrats, you have a free pass to D2. When we probably powerlynch you for being an obvious cult recruit.

pls



i'm actually masons with xofelf so idk if cult will be targeting me; too easy for me to be outed

In post 303, Menalque wrote:

also I want people to stroke my ego by voting for me, what's it to u

This is the most convincing argument so far
VOTE: menalque

In post 305, Elements wrote:

In post 303, Menalque wrote:

also I want people to stroke my ego by voting for me, what's it to u

This is the most convincing argument so far
VOTE: menalque

noice

hey Wooper

*Dab*

In post 309, Elements wrote:HURT: truesoulenergy

[the following player has been revealed to be aligned with Mafia]Elements[/the following player has been revealed to be aligned with Mafia]

In post 298, Menalque wrote:I would use my FIRE READS to save town from a mislynch, so. there's that.

No, you wouldn't.

It sounds like you would, but here's what would happen. You'd govern a lynch that you were unable to derail by arguing. We'd No Lynch instead. And then we'd wake up again and lynch the guy whose lynch you just derailed because you already proved you couldn't convince people that your FIRE READS were more right than theirs.

Too bad it didn’t go in red text

In post 309, Elements wrote:HURT: truesoulenergy

see the funny thing is

he's totally scum here lol

You have to manually do that unless it's specifically coded as a tag.

site's lagging for me so that's fun

In post 315, Chemist1422 wrote:site's lagging for me so that's fun

Again?
FYI I’m fine for now
But how many times will this happen until we get a real solution

Bingle, is governor shot in conftown hands better than no governor shot at all?

In post 311, Bingle wrote:

In post 298, Menalque wrote:I would use my FIRE READS to save town from a mislynch, so. there's that.

No, you wouldn't.

It sounds like you would, but here's what would happen. You'd govern a lynch that you were unable to derail by arguing. We'd No Lynch instead. And then we'd wake up again and lynch the guy whose lynch you just derailed because you already proved you couldn't convince people that your FIRE READS were more right than theirs.

See, that’s where you’re wrong

I’ll keep my cards super close to my chest

Wait for scum to opportunistically wagon a poor unsuspecting townie boi

Then I will spectacularly emerge from my feigned slumber, the mayor the town needs, not the one it deserves, govern that bad boi up and proceed to illuminate the scum who were leading the lynch to the rest of the gentle citizens of this here Cobble town and we will secure flawless victory

In post 317, Pink Ball wrote:Bingle, is governor shot in conftown hands better than no governor shot at all?

I like the way you’re going with this bb

(Don’t tell them we’re masons yet tho, keep up the xofelf joke thing)

In post 317, Pink Ball wrote:Bingle, is governor shot in conftown hands better than no governor shot at all?

If there is cult then conftown there is not.

Howdy. Seems like we get a lot of action today.

In post 321, davesaz wrote:

In post 317, Pink Ball wrote:Bingle, is governor shot in conftown hands better than no governor shot at all?

If there is cult then conftown there is not.

Can we elect no governor?

In post 323, Virgo the Immaculate wrote:

In post 321, davesaz wrote:

In post 317, Pink Ball wrote:Bingle, is governor shot in conftown hands better than no governor shot at all?

If there is cult then conftown there is not.

Can we elect no governor?

No, sadly you are condemned to vote for me much in the same way that Man is condemned to be free

Sorry I don’t make the rules