Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2019 12:43 pm
uh oh
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
I do think thatIn post 298, rb wrote:yes i do think it's wise to try and figure out people's alignmentsIn post 291, Kcdaspot wrote:Do you really think it wise to give that much attention to a what essentially is a null read?In post 289, rb wrote:at this point i can't read saus apart from "i am hugely worried about how i'm perceived" but they seem to think that's what the game is actually about for both alignments
don't know how to interpret it
you don't?
lol what was buddying in any of my postIn post 304, Kcdaspot wrote:Also the hyper buddy from Joey
You also didn't explain your read when Invis asked you btw
Ah I see what you're saying. That's totally my bad. I guess at that point I caught the slip, got excited that both people in the 'war' were kinda scummy, so I thought that was 2 scum there.In post 293, Joey_ wrote:In post 257, alimdia wrote:I have 0 idea what you just said. Can you rewordIn post 226, Joey_ wrote:thats a disgusting read and goes against your whole slip thought process and basically whatever you are doing rn still vote thereIn post 202, alimdia wrote:I'm inclined to think that invis vs jake is actually SvS. That's pretty rare I must say, but it seems like some light bussing gone wrong.
i have been posting after work so I am tired and it's harder for me to articulate my ideas
The premise of your slip is that inv knew before hand that jake was town, so its a TMI SvsT slip. You can't push the slip wagon while calling both mafia, that was my point
that's pretty dumb tbhIn post 301, Kcdaspot wrote:I do think thatIn post 298, rb wrote:yes i do think it's wise to try and figure out people's alignmentsIn post 291, Kcdaspot wrote:Do you really think it wise to give that much attention to a what essentially is a null read?In post 289, rb wrote:at this point i can't read saus apart from "i am hugely worried about how i'm perceived" but they seem to think that's what the game is actually about for both alignments
don't know how to interpret it
you don't?
it's just that it shakes itself out over the course of the game
I'm more interested in scum and I am interested in town anyway
If you're reading somebody null then they're null. find scum
what's wrong with it? you gonna vote him?
would there be something wrong with it if it were a wagon?
This is a bad vote.In post 34, Dolly Parton wrote:No free passes around here:In post 33, Wake1 wrote:First things first,I hate Day 1. It's the worst part of the game for me and I struggle during it. It's part of my current meta to hang back during Day 1, and then really start engaging during Day 2 and on. Day 1 I've got nothing concrete to work with, so I observe more than post during it. Typically people react as you might expect, shrieking that yours truly is Scum because if it. I'm not, and soon my wiki will reflect this. I also am up on nights, so will rarely be active during Day hours.
VOTE: Wake88
It would make sense for you to perceive it as scum. If you look back at my previous games, you’ll see I’ve only ever played scum before, never town, so I apologise if my priorities are slightly wrong.In post 295, Joey_ wrote:saus has been giving me vibes of open wolfing troll veteran or a genuine new player who flipped town but is being extremely self-conscious (trait I historically associate much more w/ scum than town)In post 289, rb wrote:at this point i can't read saus apart from "i am hugely worried about how i'm perceived" but they seem to think that's what the game is actually about for both alignments
don't know how to interpret it
I think i agree that ethos is town (at least i have a slight townread there), but not for that reason. how his interaction there town indicative?In post 57, Kcdaspot wrote:Interaction with alim
how on earth is that opportunistic?
Read on before you post ffs. People correct themselves later all the time. You are doing nobody any favors by doing catchup style posts like thisIn post 321, tris wrote:how on earth is that opportunistic?
it's helpful for me. feel free to ignore obsoleted comments.In post 322, alimdia wrote:Read on before you post ffs. People correct themselves later all the time. You are doing nobody any favors by doing catchup style posts like thisIn post 321, tris wrote:how on earth is that opportunistic?
of course, not knowing what comes later, I will point out that jake is echoing alimdia here with the opportunistic line.In post 66, Jake The Wolfie wrote:In post 63, Kcdaspot wrote:Pahahaha. No. We not lynching invis
He has 7 posts to your 2. And you're calling him out
HahahhahahahahaAt the time, that was their only post. It just goes to show that between their vote on me and my first post, they called me out for something that they themselves were doing. It seems too opportunistic to me.