Mafiascum.net

In post 290, Salamence20 wrote:Wimpy youre pretty cool when youre not a petty sumbitch

Gee thanks Wally. I think you’re pretty swell yourself.

In post 294, SausasaurusRex wrote:I’m really not liking what Winpy’s saying

Geeze. I don’t like what you’re saying but you don’t see me voting you. How rude

What about what I’m saying don’t you like and why does that make me scum? Don’t be vague

In post 294, SausasaurusRex wrote:I think Nicholai is town now

Also please explain the weird 180

In post 294, SausasaurusRex wrote:I think Nicholai is town now, so UNVOTE:
Pisskop’s 261 doesn’t contribute to the discussion in any way, as does Invisibility’s 281.
However, I’m really not liking what Winpy’s saying, so VOTE: Wimpy.

are you reading "idk" and "lol" as scummy? i've had quite a few filler posts too.

In post 298, Kanna wrote:stop showing favourites

i don't have favourites because you're all amazing (for now) so keep being awesome Kanna

In post 284, Invisibility wrote:VOTE: bob

so why this invis? bob's a pretty cool guy you know

In post 304, Nicholai wrote:

In post 294, SausasaurusRex wrote:I think Nicholai is town now, so UNVOTE:
Pisskop’s 261 doesn’t contribute to the discussion in any way, as does Invisibility’s 281.
However, I’m really not liking what Winpy’s saying, so VOTE: Wimpy.

are you reading "idk" and "lol" as scummy? i've had quite a few filler posts too.

No, I don't tink it was scummy. I was just pointing out they didn't contribute. I pointed out those specifically because Invisibility asked a question, and was responded to with a useless reply.

In post 303, Wimpy wrote:

In post 294, SausasaurusRex wrote:I think Nicholai is town now

Also please explain the weird 180

I voted Nicholai for treating members unfairly and, as a result of that, illogically. However, this is a very minor infraction, and I have since seen nothing that indicates he could be scum. I did make a slight mistype though - I meant to say "town - leaning", as I treat all players who I don't think are scum, due to the statistical likelihood of them being town.

In post 302, Wimpy wrote:What about what I’m saying don’t you like and why does that make me scum? Don’t be vague

In post 297, Kanna wrote:

In post 294, SausasaurusRex wrote:I think Nicholai is town now, so UNVOTE:
Pisskop’s 261 doesn’t contribute to the discussion in any way, as does Invisibility’s 281.
However, I’m really not liking what Winpy’s saying, so VOTE: Wimpy.

I mean, those aren’t their only posts that don’t contribute to discussion, but why is what Wimpy said worse + what don’t you like that Wimpy has said?

Sorry, I'd thought that this was more clear than it was. In 206, Wimpy says "Mislynch day 1 is actually preferable". This stood out as scummy to me over all other posts, which is why I am currently voting him. If someone does something I find more scummy, my vote will change accordingly. This argument was used by Salamence, and was called misrepresentation. I don't see how this is misrepresentation, as it is a direct quote, and so cannot be misrepresented.
It appears what he was saying was intended to say that it is a less optimal play, but I'm not seeing the logic in that. If someone explained it to me and I feel the logic is satisfactory, I will change my vote, but until then, my vote remains.

In post 307, SausasaurusRex wrote:This stood out as scummy to me over all other posts

why is it scummy though? just cause you don't agree with me doesn't make it scummy.

In post 307, SausasaurusRex wrote:This argument was used by Salamence, and was called misrepresentation. I don't see how this is misrepresentation, as it is a direct quote, and so cannot be misrepresented.

i think the misrepresentation comes because sal said I am worried about it. that is a misrep cause it's just not even true nor is it what i said. why don't you see that sal did misrep me?

I also explained my logic behind it. you didn't comment on that at all. you didn't try to point out where my logic is flawed. You say you want somebody to explain the logic, but that has been done already.

the funny thing all of this was explained and talked about before you actually voted me and you act like you didn't see any of it.

I don't know if you are scum or not but you are on the ignore/don't want to work with list. You are either scum or being super lazy

salsa and dino are both jumping on something that i don't think is scummy. it's just discussion about how mislynching day 1 is sometimes preferable, it doesn't mean Wimpo is scum admitting he is looking to mislynch today, i thought that was pretty clear.

@SausasaurusRex: are you saying i'm neutral then? we talk about reads here relatively speaking, so if you think someone is as likely mafia as anyone else, you say "neutral". "town lean" would suggest they have an increased chance of being town relative to everyone else

In post 311, Wimpy wrote:the funny thing all of this was explained and talked about before you actually voted me and you act like you didn't see any of it.

I don't know if you are scum or not but you are on the ignore/don't want to work with list. You are either scum or being super lazy

i'd cut him some slack, he seems quite new. if you think he's scummy, you should vote for him

I’m not voting him. That’s me cutting him some slack. Being new doesn’t excuse his behavior. It doesn’t excuse him for ignoring pages of posts/discussions about the very thing he voted me for. He asks for my logic to be explained but it’s already been explained.

What kills me is he said if somebody provides good logic he’ll unvote. Good logic is subjective. The logic good or bad has been provided. If somebody doesn’t agree with it, that’s fine but just cause you don’t agree doesn’t make me scum.

My 3 names were for reaction, I actually have a stronger feel that 2 of them are Scum and 1 isn't. I'm not one for reads lists because I usually have too many as neutral especially this early

reading rex's iso. he has a lot of nerve accusing two people of not contributing to discussion considering he is just as guilty of it himself. i am not fan of hypocrites. If he is town, he definitely needs to step up his game.

In post 291, joges wrote:I think Nicholai is town. That's the vibe I get while reading his posts.

and why does he leave joges off?

I could really convince myself rex is scum here but I am trying not to. I don't want to repeat of my past games.

I feel like this is just bad town.

also rex basically copies joge's statement about nicholai. it's weird they both just do 180s

In post 241, Non lmh wrote:I'll be normal when I can make time for it. just want to have fun, and solve past games rn.
I'm still a newb, so I'm milking the status for all it's worth. 5 complete games, that's the goal rn, leave me be.

How many games have you managed to rack up so far

In post 248, Salamence20 wrote:

In post 242, Wimpy wrote:

In post 231, Invisibility wrote:

In post 206, Wimpy wrote:Mislynch day 1 is actually preferable

no

Yes

VOTE: Wimpy

For worrying about mislynching

Why do you scum read him for that. Shouldnt the fact that you think he genuinely worries about mislynching be sign to you that he is town. So are you scum reading him because of that worry or are you trying to claim to us that you think its faked?

In post 292, Salamence20 wrote:Honestly Im shocked more people arent looking at Invis for scum

So what shocks you about it and what do you think you have seen that marks invis out as scum to you

In post 288, Gjt wrote:Throwing this out there top.3 Scum for me right now
Nicolai
Bob
Flavor Leaf

In post 315, Gjt wrote:My 3 names were for reaction, I actually have a stronger feel that 2 of them are Scum and 1 isn't. I'm not one for reads lists because I usually have too many as neutral especially this early

Although you say your read lists is still largley null. What do you think have seen from the 3 players you listed that marks them out as scum in your eyes. And do you hav any other reads either town leanign or scumm leanign so far

In post 166, Non lmh wrote:can I solve the game yet or

In post 167, Non lmh wrote:NVM, y'all already know the answer probs
VOTE: Sal
obvscum is obv, maybe
kek

I see you have one read so far. A few other players have said they scum read him for his push on wimpys mislynch day 1 comment. Is that why you scum read him or is there additions reads you have picked up on him that mark him as scum to you


Also what are your reads on the rest of the players. As ive noticed that you have neither commented on another player nor asked anyone a question. Even when you voted for FL it as just alone voted with the sentance

"Now who's up for pressuring this slot some more" and nothign else.

No attempt to apply any pressure what so ever. Just alone vote with no questions or anything.

What would you like to ask other players? As if you are town you would want to get inclinations of their alignment and question is one way to do it