Posted: Sat Jan 18, 2020 11:27 am
You kept on saying it was bad and blown out of proportion but now it is townie?
Feel my wrath.
Feel my wrath.
And where did I ever imply that I didn't intend on switching my vote? Egix is townreading profii so why would I need him to clarify his townread on profii in order for me to vote for profii, who I am currently scumreading.In post 301, insomnia wrote:And now you weren’t gonna switch your vote to profii “just now”, you wanted to get egix to talk on it first, but my post prompted you to do just that.
That’s not my only reasoning for scumreading Profii - I mentioned the other reasons previously.In post 255, Ame wrote:Based on this reasoning, what makes profii a better play over EV, Looker, Wimpy?In post 238, Luca Blight wrote:On balance I have Alchemist as a slight town lean.
I’m still happy with my Profii vote - there’s nothing about his play thus far that makes me think he’s Town.
I was reading back through the thread and felt like elaborating on my earlier read.In post 256, Ame wrote:You already had him as town, why did you go back to 133 in your thread reading?In post 235, Luca Blight wrote:I like this thought-process, I think Frost is Town.In post 133, AaronFrost wrote:Mostly for post 56 which felt a little exaggerated and forced to me. Followed by your immediate retraction about two minutes later. To me it read like 'oh shit I said something that might be perceived as scummy better retract it real quick.'In post 81, insomnia wrote:So what are you scum reading me for again?
It's not a strong read tbh but it's a start.
In post 291, AaronFrost wrote:I think I am starting to lean town on you a bit atm butI'll need to do an ISO dive at some pointwhich I don't have a lot of time for atm.
So you haven’t really been observing them.In post 297, AaronFrost wrote:Do I need to comment on every single one of your posts? Just because I haven't commented on them doesn't mean I haven't been observing them or taking them into consideration.They way you respond to the vote is what's telling and I think in general you've responded fairly well to it.
I've also responded to your cases so
Thanks! The feeling is mutual.In post 262, EeveeLution Army wrote: btw i love your avatar. such a good anime so far.
Where did you get his gender from?
In 169 you stated that you were caught up but skimmed and would begin isoing. Later in 175 you confirmed a town read on Aaron. (1) Presumably, you went through his iso at this point, yes?In post 304, Luca Blight wrote:I was reading back through the thread and felt like elaborating on my earlier read.In post 256, Ame wrote:You already had him as town, why did you go back to 133 in your thread reading?In post 235, Luca Blight wrote:I like this thought-process, I think Frost is Town.In post 133, AaronFrost wrote:Mostly for post 56 which felt a little exaggerated and forced to me. Followed by your immediate retraction about two minutes later. To me it read like 'oh shit I said something that might be perceived as scummy better retract it real quick.'In post 81, insomnia wrote:So what are you scum reading me for again?
It's not a strong read tbh but it's a start.
In post 10, profii wrote:And we found our first scumIn post 9, JTheophrastus Bartholomew wrote:VOTE: Exix96
I am not a fan of day 1.
I will be keeping up with the thread but don't expect any long detailed reads lists.
VOTE: JT Bart
Profii, would love if you could clarify whether the first post was RVS or you were actually scum reading him for saying that?In post 18, profii wrote:Yet we all have to do itIn post 17, Wimpy wrote:Nobody is a fan of day 1.
So I find it really frustrating in every other game I play when someone comes in and goes "Day one? Nope"
It's not fair on all the other players
Not liking this question.In post 87, profii wrote:Aaron how do you typically feel about the RVS stage of the game?
In post 308, Ame wrote:In 169 you stated that you were caught up but skimmed and would begin isoing. Later in 175 you confirmed a town read on Aaron. (1) Presumably, you went through his iso at this point, yes?
Over two new pages were produced by the time of your next post, 234. Again, 175 indicates that you were caught up with the thread up to 175, or at least with Aaron up to that point. (2) What prodded you in 234/235 to go back and review pre-175? I presume you had not yet caught up with the 2 new pages because in 237 you stated that you were unaware of Alchemist's post on the previous page. (3) Is this presumption correct?
It's just curious to me that you read back through something you had already read back through and formed a solid opinion on, while there was new content available that you had not yet caught up on.
In post 309, Luca Blight wrote:I skim through the thread and then read back in more detail later - that is my usual habit.
In post 310, Luca Blight wrote:For example, the recent stuff about Frost above I haven’t yet given my attention to - I’ll read back though it when I have the time and energy to do so.
In post 315, Luca Blight wrote:I’m having a change of heart on Frost, based on his reaction to Insomnia’s pressure which comes across as appeasement. I also agree that his Insomnia SR seemed a bit faked in that he doesn’t really do anything with it and just coasts on it for a while until he is pressured into jumping off. And thirdly I agree that it looks as though he had been positioning himself to vote Profii for some time before he did so.
VOTE: Frost
I have been, but I'll often revisit ISOs and read through stuff again in order to solidify my reads.In post 307, insomnia wrote:In post 291, AaronFrost wrote:I think I am starting to lean town on you a bit atm butI'll need to do an ISO dive at some pointwhich I don't have a lot of time for atm.So you haven’t really been observing them.In post 297, AaronFrost wrote:Do I need to comment on every single one of your posts? Just because I haven't commented on them doesn't mean I haven't been observing them or taking them into consideration.They way you respond to the vote is what's telling and I think in general you've responded fairly well to it.
I've also responded to your cases so
I like how you called me out for using insomnia's wording here yet you just did the same thing with this post.In post 315, Luca Blight wrote:I’m having a change of heart on Frost, based on his reaction to Insomnia’s pressure which comes across as appeasement. I also agree that his Insomnia SR seemed a bit faked in that he doesn’t really do anything with it and just coasts on it for a while until he is pressured into jumping off. And thirdly I agree that it looks as though he had been positioning himself to vote Profii for some time before he did so.
VOTE: Frost
Eh not really, I think Ame's question is fair. Usually I try to get caught up as much as I can before I comment on stuff but I think that's a just a playstyle thing.In post 319, Looker wrote:@Macabre / AaronFrost / profii / Alchemist21:UNVOTE:
- Do you find this interaction suspicious?
- Do you feel that either of these players is town?
The difference is I was openly agreeing with Insomnia, whereas you were accusing him of something he had already admitted himself?In post 322, AaronFrost wrote:I like how you called me out for using insomnia's wording here yet you just did the same thing with this post.In post 315, Luca Blight wrote:I’m having a change of heart on Frost, based on his reaction to Insomnia’s pressure which comes across as appeasement. I also agree that his Insomnia SR seemed a bit faked in that he doesn’t really do anything with it and just coasts on it for a while until he is pressured into jumping off. And thirdly I agree that it looks as though he had been positioning himself to vote Profii for some time before he did so.
VOTE: Frost
Ngl Luca I'm not really getting town vibes from you either this game.