Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2020 7:41 pm
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
It's not, but I'm also not going to selfvote. Should I die day 1 then I want to make absolute certain you go down. I wanted to see if you'd commit to it.In post 304, Blair wrote:Was your death pact a bluff? Because it feels like a bluff.
I've made it eminently clear that the townread on them was weak, at best (how couldn't it be, they had all of two posts), and that doing so was to get rid of the CSF slot and dunnstral (and also T-Bone, who at the time I didn't like. More recent posts put him somewhere around null). My offer included my own self-sacrifice because I perceived many players, including the IC, did not trust me. This isn't hard to understand, but of course you're not trying to do that. You're selectively zoning in on a small part of what I said and using that to scream "see he voted his townread! scum! scum!" while ignoring the rest of my thought process. You know as well as I do that only the corners are a viable lynch option day 1 (I tried thinking about the side squares last night but there's too much potential for things to go terribly wrong if you're mistaken and end up mislynching). If my top scumread's in a side slot, I need to vote a corner next to them. Fairly simple concept.In post 307, Blair wrote:Please show me where I have been averse to doing so.
It's equally strange, by the way, that someone who entered the game scumreading me for analyzing the game board immediately began plotting to lynch their town read *for the game board*
You're right, but for all intents in purposes it results in the same outcome. For example if we lynch Beeboy, Maxwell/T-Bone essentially become lovers and CSF/Dunnstral essentially become the other lover pair.In post 279, Clover Ebi wrote: Am I missing something? Can't in theory we lynch the person on the other side of the square? Not just beside them. So if max was lynched we have 4 options not just a 1v1? Or am I incorrect.
People are agreeing to it, you would put Dunn at L-1 if you moved your vote.In post 286, maxwell wrote:I'll take the Dunnstral vote if people agree to it, I definitely think beeboy is likely town at this point and a sequence that gets CSF and Blair is ideal for me based on where my reads are. Sort of bothered by how static clover's reads are with them seeming to be based on stuff in the first couple pages but not enough to change my read on him, just knocks down my confidence a couple of rungs.
So more on this:In post 251, Clover Ebi wrote:Why is townreading someone who has the same thought process as you bad?
The way they've locktowned each other so early on is not something I usually see from scum, I don't think Blair calls Clover 'obvtown' when I'm pushing on him and I don't think Clover doubles down so much on Blair if they are worried about how they'd look on the other's flip.In post 262, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Gl, why don't you think Clover and Blair are SvS?
I do want you potentially voting them on D2?? Why do you say 'ever' here?In post 275, beeboy wrote:If you don't want to vote edges, why is you're instinct to ask me for reads on 3 edge players when you don't want me voting them ever.
I care because the edges matter a lot even if we're not lynching there today. This last sentence is just projection/assumption on your partIn post 275, beeboy wrote:I don't get it, it's weird because you're asking me for reads that you don't actually have a reason to care about.
You're filling space not seeking out my reads in a way to work with me if my answer somehow convinces you I am town.
Right.In post 314, T-Bone wrote:People are agreeing to it, you would put Dunn at L-1 if you moved your vote.In post 286, maxwell wrote:I'll take the Dunnstral vote if people agree to it, I definitely think beeboy is likely town at this point and a sequence that gets CSF and Blair is ideal for me based on where my reads are. Sort of bothered by how static clover's reads are with them seeming to be based on stuff in the first couple pages but not enough to change my read on him, just knocks down my confidence a couple of rungs.
This is nefarious because she didn't comment on anything else AI in the thread, but felt the need to question a vote.
This is nefarious because she seemed excited to play with Guilty just a few posts earlier, but was happy to jump on his wagon.In post 67, Kanna wrote:VOTE: GuiltyLion
I kind of agree. @Guilty; if you pointed out so many things, why did you default to voting for 2 people who haven't shown up?