Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2020 7:05 am
arguably it was the major thing that kickstarted non-RVS discussionIn post 298, Starbuck wrote:What did you like about it?
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
arguably it was the major thing that kickstarted non-RVS discussionIn post 298, Starbuck wrote:What did you like about it?
What are you town reading exactly from their 4 posts?
What's shit about it?In post 185, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Catboi's attitude to the game in post 181 is shit and i want to vote there now.
Why?
UNVOTE: NDMathIn post 258, Joey_ wrote:Red’s post are the worse in the game so far; exclusively showing a scum pov, being almost too self-aware, apologetic, not inquisitive by answering for the person hes asking/talking to. He sounds like a monologue and NEE “What’s a joke?” Is more towny to me than red’s 3 last wall. It says a lot
I've answered this exact question 10 times now.In post 306, Starbuck wrote:What's shit about it?
I liked the post on Joey felt more like solving then wolf making comments.In post 305, BananaCucho wrote:Like I don't have a scum read on the alligator
There's literally nothing there to read either way. How can you town read them?
Just link it, she clearly isn't caught upIn post 307, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I've answered this exact question 10 times now.In post 306, Starbuck wrote:What's shit about it?
I disagree, their posts are very easy for scum to make. All they've done is narrate the game or ask easy questions, without coming to any visible conclusions. Obviously it's a short ISO, so they could improve later if and when they decide to post again. But townreading them off of what i've seen so far doesn't make much sense to me.In post 308, androgybee wrote:I liked the post on Joey felt more like solving then wolf making comments.In post 305, BananaCucho wrote:Like I don't have a scum read on the alligator
There's literally nothing there to read either way. How can you town read them?
Like it was kinda observant I guess, shows he was pinged by Joey and either double checked his ISO or put his posts into his memory to make that kind of connection.
He is definitely well above average as far as 4 posters are concerned.
~Bee
Ahhh, okay. That makes sense.In post 296, Something_Smart wrote:I felt it was a pretty good climax. Everyone's unsure of whether to trust it and some people are following it out of fear and then I drop a cryptic vote and leave, and then right at the height of the discussion I reveal that I knew it was a bluff all along.
That's understandable. I thought you might have been referencing the difference of playing a Normal versus a Theme game.In post 297, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Mostly the: "If you don't use colour tag blue when saying corruption you will gain corruption" nonsense we were lied about.In post 295, Starbuck wrote:What do you find weird?
I misquoted, my apologies.In post 299, Something_Smart wrote:but I was not the one who pointed it outIn post 298, Starbuck wrote:I know other folks asked this both before and after this post, but pointing this out is scummy AF.
True, I can see that now.In post 300, Something_Smart wrote:arguably it was the major thing that kickstarted non-RVS discussionIn post 298, Starbuck wrote:What did you like about it?
Just went back to your ISO in another tab. I see it now. I asked as I saw the quote. You could have just pointed me to whatever post, too.In post 307, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I've answered this exact question 10 times now.In post 306, Starbuck wrote:What's shit about it?
Who exactly are you asking to explain my vote?In post 306, Starbuck wrote:Not understanding the Porkens votes on Page 8. Can someone explain?
What's shit about it?In post 185, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Catboi's attitude to the game in post 181 is shit and i want to vote there now.
Why?
I like NDMath's posts on Page 10.
I'm not liking redtea's 221 in regards to Banana at all. It feels condescending and "if I was in your position, I would have done it THIS way." I appreciate the elaboration, but I don't like how they went about it.
I'm also onboard with this regarding redtea:
UNVOTE: NDMathIn post 258, Joey_ wrote:Red’s post are the worse in the game so far; exclusively showing a scum pov, being almost too self-aware, apologetic, not inquisitive by answering for the person hes asking/talking to. He sounds like a monologue and NEE “What’s a joke?” Is more towny to me than red’s 3 last wall. It says a lot
VOTE: redtea
In post 316, NorwegianboyEE wrote:In post 315, Porkens wrote:and there are no votes about me on page 8.
Yeah, we're not talking about the scum PT.In post 318, Porkens wrote:Oh THAT page 8. jfc ignore me
The people who are voting you on Page 8.In post 314, Porkens wrote:Who exactly are you asking to explain my vote?
Reasoning?