Mafiascum.net

In post 295, Nosferatu wrote:

In post 294, ItalianoVD wrote: Well at the very least he’s an unhelpful pointless townie
VOTE: Nosferatu

ok now i know somethings up bro you're not telling me you actually read that incoherent ramble and just said "well ya know hes not doing much"

WHAT

Frogsterking wrote:
I also thought Nosferatu's reaction to my FoS was terrible in addition to his silent BW in the spoilers below:

In post 210, Nosferatu wrote:

In post 182, Frogsterking wrote:I feel like Nosferatu if he flipped town would just post some filler there instead of explaining that he couldn't post filler because he's drunk.

Like you really think a guy who took the time to upload an animated avatar of some movie star consuming a cigar or joint or whatever the fuck that is would feel too self-aware to post some filler because he's been drinking?

what are you even saying bro
which one of us was drinking last night lmao

In post 265, Nosferatu wrote:wait until sober to post*

In post 238, Nosferatu wrote:VOTE: walter

Overall sordoros appears closer to new-neutral than new-scum from my point of view while Nosferatu straight up deserves a BW.

#1

he didnt even say what he didnt like bro

#2

what the fuck is a silent bandwagon, a naked vote?

#3

he literally quoted a correction you can't even tell what im talking about

this is like performance art

(added numbers and bold)

I just made a massive post detailing exactly what I didn't like.

Yes where I refer to a silent BW it means hopping on the BW with a naked vote.

This is true, I did leave a quote out on accident. Unfortunately (for you) having them both together doesn't help too much with the comprehension anyway. Here they both are:

In post 264, Nosferatu wrote:

In post 255, Frogsterking wrote:Wouldn't call active lurking + silent BW + immediate counter BW from three other players a null slot or bad excuse for a vote.

u unironically sat down at ur computer and said that u didnt believe that i would post sober bc the person in my avatar was smoking LMAO

In post 265, Nosferatu wrote:wait until sober to post*

I think it's interesting you became image-conscious enough to self-correct your post above immediately after the pressure on you started. From my point of view the self-preservation escalates here:

In post 298, Nosferatu wrote:

In post 297, Raya36 wrote:I think Frog is probably town

also moving my vote somewhere more useful
VOTE: Walter

why do you think its more useful there???

Now that Nosferatu's been called out (and read my post thoroughly enough to point out the missing quote) he finally asks his first open-ended question of the day.

I'd also like to point out that Nosferatu uses ATE constantly as a defense with comments like "srsly bro u think that lmao."

In post 296, Nosferatu wrote:hes literally babbling and you're eating it up LMFAO did you even open the spoilers???

An example of Nosferatu's ATE in the quote above.

In post 298, Nosferatu wrote:

In post 297, Raya36 wrote:I think Frog is probably town

also moving my vote somewhere more useful
VOTE: Walter

why do you think its more useful there???

@Nosferatu: Do you think Walter is scum? If so, why do you think Raya shouldn't think Walter is scum?

ignoring above

In post 301, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 296, Nosferatu wrote:hes literally babbling and you're eating it up LMFAO did you even open the spoilers???

An example of Nosferatu's ATE in the quote above.

thats not what appeal to emotion means

and logical fallacies aren't meant to be thrown around as buzzwords to call out "errors" as you see fit

In post 302, callforjudgement wrote:

In post 298, Nosferatu wrote:

In post 297, Raya36 wrote:I think Frog is probably town

also moving my vote somewhere more useful
VOTE: Walter

why do you think its more useful there???

@Nosferatu: Do you think Walter is scum? If so, why do you think Raya shouldn't think Walter is scum?

no, someone literally asked why the wagon existed and i said that it was literally like trolling idk why anyone would join the wagon after that exchange

In post 300, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 295, Nosferatu wrote:

In post 294, ItalianoVD wrote: Well at the very least he’s an unhelpful pointless townie
VOTE: Nosferatu

ok now i know somethings up bro you're not telling me you actually read that incoherent ramble and just said "well ya know hes not doing much"

WHAT

Frogsterking wrote:
I also thought Nosferatu's reaction to my FoS was terrible in addition to his silent BW in the spoilers below:

In post 210, Nosferatu wrote:

In post 182, Frogsterking wrote:I feel like Nosferatu if he flipped town would just post some filler there instead of explaining that he couldn't post filler because he's drunk.

Like you really think a guy who took the time to upload an animated avatar of some movie star consuming a cigar or joint or whatever the fuck that is would feel too self-aware to post some filler because he's been drinking?

what are you even saying bro
which one of us was drinking last night lmao

In post 265, Nosferatu wrote:wait until sober to post*

In post 238, Nosferatu wrote:VOTE: walter

Overall sordoros appears closer to new-neutral than new-scum from my point of view while Nosferatu straight up deserves a BW.

#1

he didnt even say what he didnt like bro

#2

what the fuck is a silent bandwagon, a naked vote?

#3

he literally quoted a correction you can't even tell what im talking about

this is like performance art

(added numbers and bold)

#1

I just made a massive post detailing exactly what I didn't like.

#2

Yes where I refer to a silent BW it means hopping on the BW with a naked vote.

#3

This is true, I did leave a quote out on accident. Unfortunately (for you) having them both together doesn't help too much with the comprehension anyway. Here they both are:

In post 264, Nosferatu wrote:

In post 255, Frogsterking wrote:Wouldn't call active lurking + silent BW + immediate counter BW from three other players a null slot or bad excuse for a vote.

u unironically sat down at ur computer and said that u didnt believe that i would post sober bc the person in my avatar was smoking LMAO

In post 265, Nosferatu wrote:wait until sober to post*

I think it's interesting you became image-conscious enough to self-correct your post above immediately after the pressure on you started. From my point of view the self-preservation escalates here:

In post 298, Nosferatu wrote:

In post 297, Raya36 wrote:I think Frog is probably town

also moving my vote somewhere more useful
VOTE: Walter

why do you think its more useful there???

Now that Nosferatu's been called out (and read my post thoroughly enough to point out the missing quote) he finally asks his first open-ended question of the day.

I'd also like to point out that Nosferatu uses ATE constantly as a defense with comments like "srsly bro u think that lmao."

oh boy numbers now

1. no you did not explain why those posts were a "terrible reaction"
3. i didnt become image conscious i literally started playing the game when i wasnt before??? why did you "call out" my """""active lurking""""" if you didnt want it to stop?

In post 303, Nosferatu wrote:

In post 302, callforjudgement wrote: @Nosferatu: Do you think Walter is scum? If so, why do you think Raya shouldn't think Walter is scum?

no, someone literally asked why the wagon existed and i said that it was literally like trolling idk why anyone would join the wagon after that exchange

In that case, why is your vote still on that wagon?

i dont like unvoting; i dont see a pressing reason to switch off, etc

I would have thought "this wagon is the largest and growing and I don't think it's on scum" would be a pressing reason to switch off. This is also a gamestate in which your vote might be particularly helpful elsewhere; it's definitely a case of too many scummy people rather than too few, and wagons anywhere are having trouble forming, with the votes spread all over the place. So I'd expect you, if town, to have a stronger scumread elsewhere (i.e. someone who's scummier than "I don't think this person is scum"). The whole reason that unvoting is usually bad is that it makes you harder to read and means your vote is of no use for pressuring people – but voting a townlean is bad for exactly the same reasons!

callforjudgement continues their focus on optimal play. I suspect their desire to lecture people over how they ought to play is a NAI personality trait.

@Nos, do you think Frogster is mafia?

In post 303, Nosferatu wrote: no, someone literally asked why the wagon existed and i said that it was literally like trolling idk why anyone would join the wagon after that exchange

Let's find out!

In post 299, Raya36 wrote:There's no wagon on callforjudgement anymore while there is on Walter. Plus I can barely read judgements posts so I need to go back through later

So you voted for Walter because other people were voting for him?

In post 308, SJReaver wrote:callforjudgement continues their focus on optimal play. I suspect their desire to lecture people over how they ought to play is a NAI personality trait.

@Nos, do you think Frogster is mafia?

probably not i cant imagine one would be so audaciously unintelligible like that esp cause most ppl in this game are kinda nooby just off join date

In post 292, Raya36 wrote:

In post 230, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:What is bad from my perspective of 91 is the second part on the part about tomorrownow she may have picked up a scum italiano but it does not seem helpful. K, enthuisiastic, yes.
The come get me scum posts that are 112 113 and 114, and 115 where she says she is scum.

Do you think claiming scum more likely comes from scum though? Especially from someone new?

Possibly, but it might fit with SJ's playsyle as those posts have claims switching around, particularly the fact sj did again in 216.
From someone new, I don't know if they would want the attention that would bring, so probably not.

I read through frog's case on sou probably being neutral and I agree. That slot is back to null.

Stupid DAMN newbies.

I agree that newb!scum might be worried about the attention. (And yes, I know that newb!scum is me in this case so my judgement is suspect as hell)

That no one has seriously scum read me or pushed my slot is a touch disappointing. As scum, I think I'd be a touch more timid? I know it sounds like BS, but if you look at my games, I've only drawn town. I'd love to think that I'd be as aggressive as scum, but until it happens, I can't know.

By the way, I am town

Totally town

RCE is the only one who took my bait and I town read them. It makes me sad.

Why couldn't frogster lock horns with me?

I would spend the rest of day 1 fighting them while the other townies solved the damn game. Instead, I'm stuck here on the sidelines, trying to guess which of you jerks are mafia.

And my scumhunting is crap.

9 times out of 10, my reads are bad.

ddkl;jfdoihjsflsjkfsafe

Will someone please scum read me so I can feel useful?

In post 256, RCEnigma wrote:Frog is probably town. That's a wild wild take.

everyone is probably town, it isn't a very wild take at all...

In post 263, SJReaver wrote:Not_Mafia is not a sheep but a cow. I find sheeping accusations underwhelming. If every townie does their own thing, we don't tend to get very far.

VOTE: geraintm

You spend more time talking about how you dislike day one than you do scumhunting. You may have a pulse but it's a weak one.

I have sat here and pointed out a few things that I have noted as potentially as interesting. that is as much as you'll get from me and a vote isn't going to make it any different

In post 290, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 289, Nosferatu wrote:am i getting punk'd lmao?

u accused me of active lurking on like my 2nd or 3rd post lmao?

did prodging become AI while i was away im starting to get lost in the sauce rn

VOTE: Nosferatu VOTE: Nosferatu

what's happening? what's happening?

In post 316, geraintm wrote: I have sat here and pointed out a few things that I have noted as potentially as interesting. that is as much as you'll get from me and a vote isn't going to make it any different

But I want more.

Just a few reads? Town or mafia, indulging me a bit won't hurt. At least I can see where your head is at.

I mean, day 1 is two weeks long. Even if you think it's stupid an unnecessarily, you'll make be a bit happier. I'll feel more comfortable if your slot doesn't seem like a black hole.

The thing is... I'm not an asshole? I get that everyone plays their own way. But no matter what you're thinking, it's rough for me to sit here day after day and say, "geraintm--same as ever, very little."

you might want more....but I am notgoing to fake a bunch of reads just to please you.

In post 316, geraintm wrote:everyone is probably town, it isn't a very wild take at all...

Frogs take was wild. For reasons stated in a follow up post.

In post 313, SJReaver wrote:RCE is the only one who took my bait and I town read them. It makes me sad.

It wasn't great bait. Even my vote wasn't serious.

In post 320, RCEnigma wrote:

In post 313, SJReaver wrote:RCE is the only one who took my bait and I town read them. It makes me sad.

It wasn't great bait. Even my vote wasn't serious.

Honestly? I'm banging two rocks together to make fire. I appreciate you humoring me.

Welcome to the inner machinations of my mind.

I think my problem with this game is all of the surface level accusations that are surely to go nowhere. Some of them might even be on scum! But I only know one person that has voted scum for sure.

Nos I think you reducing Frogs case down to unintelligible babble is disingenuous at best. But the strong reaction to a weak case concerning.

What's more concerning is your attention being directed at frog and not the following votes on a wagon that you should recognize doesn't hold much weight.

What's up man talk to me, what's got you bothered?

Cinder blocks keep falling on my head