Mafiascum.net

In post 298, Aristophanes wrote:

In post 285, Tayl0r Swift wrote:

In post 283, JohnnyFarrar wrote:

In post 281, DoubtingThomas wrote:TWBTAW

What does this mean

too wolfy to be a wolf (too scummy to be scum)

A term I now see shifting into Openwolfing which I like 100x better!

I feel like these two are different terms tbf

noraa + superb might be fishing for a reason to go after Thomas but it's unlikely. Thomas being obstinate also feels like a towntell; scum would have less issue with fluff

In post 297, Aristophanes wrote: Lol uh sure...

I'll be around dw

I'm not worried. I want to eliminate you from my scum pool, but in order to do that I need to see you work.


Superbowl is town.

In post 301, PlusJOYED wrote:noraa + superb might be fishing for a reason to go after Thomas but it's unlikely. Thomas being obstinate also feels like a towntell; scum would have less issue with fluff

Im lowkey insulted if you think this is me fishing for a mislim ToT

In post 302, chkflip wrote:Superbowl is town.

That's exactly what scumfuck soupbowl wants you to think

This site is getting on my nerves, i had collected posts in a multiquote for questions and comments i wanted to post and they are gone.
Do Q+ vanish when you go to the next page? It does not save?

In post 162, Guillotina wrote:

In post 161, Tayl0r Swift wrote:im a noob and it means i cant possibly be scum. pls no vote

Wrong statement.

I owned a group of highly experienced players in a game where i was a mafia goon and a noob.

Just like im gonna own a group of wolves in this one as a newbie town. Don't underestimate the power of noobs.

Pretty towny

-tabletop

In post 282, DoubtingThomas wrote:

In post 250, Gamma Emerald wrote:Oh you just responded out of order. We played in the Merchant’s Daughter game, we were scum together

Tbh that delayed response has me like :S

wait btw did we win? wasnt Nancy Drew there

yeah we won

In post 286, Guillotina wrote: Interesting choice of words. “I eat players like you for breakfast” in a game where scum are the cannibals. I know that remark is NAI but it was so funny! Lol.

Disregarding the rest of the post rn because it’s probably weaksauce nonsense, why call this out if you don’t feel it’s alignment indicative at all? If I’m trying to legitimately send a message with that, it places me in a small set of players where if I’m town, it would be advised to not call such a thing out. I wasn’t exactly subtle about it, but you felt compelled to call it out for no constructive purpose. If you are town all you are doing is sounding like a smug smartass by calling something out like this. All you’re doing in that case is signaling that you’re desperate for validation of your intelligence. Which kinda lines up with the attitude you’ve already put out.

In post 76, PlusJOYED wrote:

In post 27, JohnnyFarrar wrote:

In post 22, Guillotina wrote:Hi guys. First game here.

VOTE: DoubtingThomas

Sup dude!

Have you played before? Do you have any questions before I forget you're a newbie and just treat you like a peer?

this feels like a townie reaction to me, more genuine and cutting the fluff to get into and advance gamestate

The first 5 pages of this game were indeed trash within the game solving context. Except for this post. His question felt like bootlicking and town-reading it as genuine was...odd. When a game starts i only think there are townies and scum.
Newbies, experienced, women, men, hydras are terms that become completely irrelevant once a game starts. You dont worry about if someone is a newbie, worry if he is scum or not.

Bootlicking could be an attempt to pocket someone so, a bit suspicious.

Yeah the entire point-by-point response was just twisting everything I said until you could reasonably turn it against me. No thanks, not dignifying that with a proper breakdown.

In post 306, Guillotina wrote:This site is getting on my nerves, i had collected posts in a multiquote for questions and comments i wanted to post and they are gone.
Do Q+ vanish when you go to the next page? It does not save?

Yeah. Also if you’re on mobile and you quote something but change your mind about responding to it, double-check that it isn’t still Q+ed because a lot of the time I have accidentally quoted things at the start of posts when I’m not mindful of that.

In post 308, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 282, DoubtingThomas wrote:

In post 250, Gamma Emerald wrote:Oh you just responded out of order. We played in the Merchant’s Daughter game, we were scum together

Tbh that delayed response has me like :S

wait btw did we win? wasnt Nancy Drew there

yeah we won

In post 286, Guillotina wrote: Interesting choice of words. “I eat players like you for breakfast” in a game where scum are the cannibals. I know that remark is NAI but it was so funny! Lol.

Disregarding the rest of the post rn because it’s probably weaksauce nonsense, why call this out if you don’t feel it’s alignment indicative at all? If I’m trying to legitimately send a message with that, it places me in a small set of players where if I’m town, it would be advised to not call such a thing out. I wasn’t exactly subtle about it, but you felt compelled to call it out for no constructive purpose. If you are town all you are doing is sounding like a smug smartass by calling something out like this. All you’re doing in that case is signaling that you’re desperate for validation of your intelligence. Which kinda lines up with the attitude you’ve already put out.

I stated why i called it out, it's in the post you quoted.



I don't believe you didnt read the entire post considering how fixated you are onto me. So saying that you disregard the rest of the post because it's probably weaksause, is bullshit and you know it.
I think we are looking at a case of measuring whose penis is bigger here. You got a horse size one and a got a two inches one, there. Your ego wins, can we now catch scum?

Yes, this means i town read you for now because you've been the only one who was not afraid to thunderdome with me and speak your mind freely. It never felt like your words were calculated, it was raw emotion triggered by my riding in a high horse attitude. Scum has been trying to throw shade on me or avoiding me, but you went all head on against me and speaking your mind.

In post 310, Gamma Emerald wrote:Yeah the entire point-by-point response was just twisting everything I said until you could reasonably turn it against me. No thanks, not dignifying that with a proper breakdown.

It was not my intention to twist and turn it against you. It's a habit. I'm a psychologist.

In post 144, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 128, DoubtingThomas wrote:5 pages of no real substance though isn't great

Why is it that this post happens every RVS ever played?? Why do people think they see no content (there is AI content in these pages so idek what ur on in the first place), then instead of generating content just complain about it and dip??? I never understand it

Ok. I'll bite. What AI content was in the first 5 pages?

In post 153, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 150, DoubtingThomas wrote:

In post 144, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 128, DoubtingThomas wrote:5 pages of no real substance though isn't great

Why is it that this post happens every RVS ever played?? Why do people think they see no content (there is AI content in these pages so idek what ur on in the first place), then instead of generating content just complain about it and dip??? I never understand it

also probably because this site's meta for sod1 sucks? lol

So your approach to D1 is “sit back and let others do the work for me”. Good to know

Ok. I need to understand the figure of speech here.

When you said D1, did you mean real day 1? (The first 24 hours of the game) or Day Phase 1?

In post 313, Guillotina wrote:

In post 310, Gamma Emerald wrote:Yeah the entire point-by-point response was just twisting everything I said until you could reasonably turn it against me. No thanks, not dignifying that with a proper breakdown.

It was not my intention to twist and turn it against you. It's a habit. I'm a psychologist.

That may be so, but you seemed intent to take anything I said the opposite to what I meant if it served to debase my statement. That seems less like proper psychology and more like a self-serving implementation of it.

But setting that aside, it seems you are being genuine here. As such, I’ll let the push go, but I’ll also state I still don’t really rate you. It’s easy to talk a big game, but without proper evidence I can’t tell how well you fit into those big shoes you’re trying to fill.
UNVOTE:

VOTE: Chaos Triforce
Idk if I had been clear on this yet, but I feel like they generally haven’t been impressive, and Noraa in particular seems a bit off I think? To put a pinpoint on one of my issues, I feel like they’re a bit overly defensive about everything.

In post 299, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 294, chkflip wrote:YO SUPERBOWL DID YOU RAND SCUM WITHOUT ME!?

You’ll know if you’re dead by tomorrow

I see this specifically coming from scum more than town.

-norbear

I think I agree with table on the TR on guillotine. There was one post that pinged me as really towny earlier.

-nronor

In post 192, PlusJOYED wrote:guillotine feels like they are taking too much risk by being so straight man to be scum

Noraa hasn't scumread me yet so that's a red flag

You are town-reading me for the wrong reasons. There is powerwolfing and there is truthwolfing, how do you know im not one of the two. Put me under proper scrutiny.

I believe the comment about Noraa is due to history between you?

In post 316, Gamma Emerald wrote:Idk if I had been clear on this yet, but I feel like they generally haven’t been impressive, and Noraa in particular seems a bit off I think? To put a pinpoint on one of my issues, I feel like they’re a bit overly defensive about everything.

You're probs scum for this post specifically.
1) if I remember correctly, we are a big wagon which is great reason for scum to jump on just by itself
2) you've played with me in legit like 5 games and ik very well that you know defensiveness is a character trait
3) you literally haven't mentioned us a single time up until this vote

solid SR right here. very solid.

-nornor

In post 185, superbowl9 wrote:I can see now why they elim you first every game buddy... you are clearly too dynamic a thinker for scum to leave around

If i was a town roleblocker i would roleblock you on N1 for this comment. Yah, you also know what this comment means.

In post 316, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 313, Guillotina wrote:

In post 310, Gamma Emerald wrote:Yeah the entire point-by-point response was just twisting everything I said until you could reasonably turn it against me. No thanks, not dignifying that with a proper breakdown.

It was not my intention to twist and turn it against you. It's a habit. I'm a psychologist.

That may be so, but you seemed intent to take anything I said the opposite to what I meant if it served to debase my statement. That seems less like proper psychology and more like a self-serving implementation of it.

But setting that aside, it seems you are being genuine here. As such, I’ll let the push go, but I’ll also state I still don’t really rate you. It’s easy to talk a big game, but without proper evidence I can’t tell how well you fit into those big shoes you’re trying to fill.
UNVOTE:

VOTE: Chaos Triforce
Idk if I had been clear on this yet, but I feel like they generally haven’t been impressive, and Noraa in particular seems a bit off I think? To put a pinpoint on one of my issues, I feel like they’re a bit overly defensive about everything.

Nobody can really rate me. I'm unique, unorthodox in my approach and i can change my meta in every game, so judging me based on meta from past games would be pointless too.

This is why i also suspect DoubtingThomas, because he says that based on games he's played with me he thinks I'm town, but he knows i change meta effortlessly in every game and i manipulate meta after the game ends too. He knows this and I know DoubtingThomas can do this as well.
So his willingness to town read me based on meta makes me put him in the null list because ke knows better. He suspects 2 out of 4 people i suspect too, that is why i don't put him in my PoE list yet.

That said, im willing to work with a null read to catch these damn cannibals whim im sure are drooling over the sight of my flesh.

no I don't know you change meta effortlessly. I played with you as a wolf against town in a game I subbed where I didn't notice you that much (lundun bastard) and then that mash where you wolfed against me, no? I dont recall any other games. the ongoing one I honestly barely read anyone

Not interested in voting Gamma at this juncture.