Mafiascum.net

Oh I just reread the kill rules and buddy system is good for catching scum potentially but maybe scum have a tool against it? I’m curious whether being in a room with multiple scum would allow them to still kill

In post 292, Gamma Emerald wrote:Mafia get a NK if in a room with town
As such I’d prefer we keep groups as small as possible. Groups of 2 would be good but idk if that’s ENTIRELY feasible

no that's not how it works

mafia get a bonus NK if they are in a room with town and no witnesses. so as long as each townie has another townie with them, they are invulnerable to bonus NK.

Hence our groups should be as big as possible.

In post 296, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 289, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 35, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:should we all claim task number? i see no reason not to

I have 2

I think it helps with allocating dead tasks so yeah
I have 1

electric?

Weapons

In post 287, Battle Mage wrote:i think it's most likely that Alisae is town and Titus is scum. Akarin town, Pooky town, Cakez town.

Sell me on these reads.

In post 276, Akarin wrote:1-2 people will die every night anyway. Those tasks don't get completed.

So we're going to be picking up some extra tasks no matter what.

There will likely be enough tasks, scum don't need to avoid claiming them, that's not going to be a reliable tell.

There are 10 possible locations, it's not as trivial to keep everyone together as I think Flea and Cute Barking Doggy are thinking.

What is this garbage.

The first two points in no way countered what I said about No Eliming being dumb and the tasks point being a non-issue.

The last point is uhhhhhhhh I wasn't worried about that? I want to keep scum in the dark. They already have the advantage of the informed minority. Telling them exactly where we're going, what we need to be doing, is awful. Especially since, again, this is a CLOSED SETUP.

In post 297, MURDERCAT wrote:

In post 258, Akarin wrote:Does anyone have post restrictions that will really strongly impair playing the game as normal on later days?

It will be pretty annoying, but nothing that would impact the content

MIssed this. I have a word count restriction later on

In post 57, MURDERCAT wrote:

In post 52, TheGoldenParadox wrote:idk about y'all but both my tasks require specific posts so i think we should try to restrict postcount in later days and focus on thought-out, task checked walls

*looks at condo prices in dead thread*

What’s with the condo stuff

i am going to be much lower post count when i get post restricted cuz my post restriction is kinda annoying

In post 305, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 57, MURDERCAT wrote:

In post 52, TheGoldenParadox wrote:idk about y'all but both my tasks require specific posts so i think we should try to restrict postcount in later days and focus on thought-out, task checked walls

*looks at condo prices in dead thread*

What’s with the condo stuff

I think she's not expecting to last long

Oh and titus, no pocketing me this time. I will remain oblivious to your attempts

Like, I don't know how to get through to you all that hedging all of our bets on Task Completion and almost entirely ignoring traditional scumhunting is bad in a closed setup and the people who are pushing No Elim are probably scum.

In post 294, Flea The Magician wrote:There is none, unless they're imposters.

But Imposters have to take the tasks too, no one's gonna claim Imposter like that.

With ~34 tasks and 10 different rooms I just think some of you are overestimating how quickly we'll get tasks done.

I like Pooky's plan for the most part, although I think maybe only claiming N1 might be better, then work out a new arrangement on N2. But popcorning is probably best.

Since I already felt I had to claim that I'm in the same room twice, that puts me in a weird spot, I don't want to wait until N2 and N3 to do anything if it doesn't make sense for anyone else to go with me, I'd be willing to risk it alone, and that might be worth doing depending on where others are going.



I just needed to get that out there so people knew it was a thing that could exist.

In post 305, Gamma Emerald wrote:What’s with the condo stuff

It's a clever way to say that Titus and I are gunna get yeeted to the dead thread. Titus because she doesn't want to RQS, me because I'm incapable of restricting my post count.

In post 306, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i am going to be much lower post count when i get post restricted cuz my post restriction is kinda annoying

ʕノ•ᴥ•ʔノ ︵ ┻━┻

In post 308, OutWorldER wrote:Like, I don't know how to get through to you all that hedging all of our bets on Task Completion and almost entirely ignoring traditional scumhunting is bad in a closed setup and the people who are pushing No Elim are probably scum.

Agree but disagree that the people pushing no elim are scum. Except cake who is scum.

I can't decide if this is a good idea or not.
Assuming scum have to have a way to interfere shouldn't we hunt for them first and then shift gears once that role is dead?
I don't like chasing shadows/making assumptions, but this seems to be a safe one to make and should easily be proven/disproven either during the room phase or post room phase.

In post 306, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i am going to be much lower post count when i get post restricted cuz my post restriction is kinda annoying

PT with me at some point and ill be your megaphone the following phase

i mean, we both go to navigation.

MURDERCAT wrote:

In post 308, OutWorldER wrote:Like, I don't know how to get through to you all that hedging all of our bets on Task Completion and almost entirely ignoring traditional scumhunting is bad in a closed setup and the people who are pushing No Elim are probably scum.

Agree but disagree that the people pushing no elim are scum. Except cake who is scum.

damn it, my first non-scumread.

i need to powerwolf harder, FFS taking my spotlight

In post 309, Akarin wrote:

In post 294, Flea The Magician wrote:There is none, unless they're imposters.

But Imposters have to take the tasks too, no one's gonna claim Imposter like that.

With ~34 tasks and 10 different rooms I just think some of you are overestimating how quickly we'll get tasks done.

I like Pooky's plan for the most part, although I think maybe only claiming N1 might be better, then work out a new arrangement on N2. But popcorning is probably best.

Since I already felt I had to claim that I'm in the same room twice, that puts me in a weird spot, I don't want to wait until N2 and N3 to do anything if it doesn't make sense for anyone else to go with me, I'd be willing to risk it alone, and that might be worth doing depending on where others are going.

And I think people that have to be in the same room twice should probably NOT claim that about their roles unless they are claiming everything.

I just needed to get that out there so people knew it was a thing that could exist.

Oh I know it's going to take a while, I've got a long task (∩︵∩)

OOOOOOOO I wonder if you can do a double post restriction and get both tasks done

we can always swing to scumhunting if the task plan isn't working...

In post 312, MURDERCAT wrote:

In post 308, OutWorldER wrote:Like, I don't know how to get through to you all that hedging all of our bets on Task Completion and almost entirely ignoring traditional scumhunting is bad in a closed setup and the people who are pushing No Elim are probably scum.

Agree but disagree that the people pushing no elim are scum. Except cake who is scum.

why are you stuck on this

Taly you are the best

In post 308, OutWorldER wrote:Like, I don't know how to get through to you all that hedging all of our bets on Task Completion and almost entirely ignoring traditional scumhunting is bad in a closed setup and the people who are pushing No Elim are probably scum.

You’re probably right but there’s time for doing both (probably)

I'm back. Let me read up

In post 312, MURDERCAT wrote:

In post 308, OutWorldER wrote:Like, I don't know how to get through to you all that hedging all of our bets on Task Completion and almost entirely ignoring traditional scumhunting is bad in a closed setup and the people who are pushing No Elim are probably scum.

Agree but disagree that the people pushing no elim are scum. Except cake who is scum.

I'd be down for a Cakez elim.

I'm still entirely convinced that Pooky/Alisae are trying to wrangle the game and town into a favorable state for scum.

In post 313, Bell wrote:I can't decide if this is a good idea or not.
Assuming scum have to have a way to interfere shouldn't we hunt for them first and then shift gears once that role is dead?
I don't like chasing shadows/making assumptions, but this seems to be a safe one to make and should easily be proven/disproven either during the room phase or post room phase.

elimming a townie = 1 less townie completing tasks

we win when all the tasks are done.

In post 321, OutWorldER wrote:I'd be down for a Cakez elim.

I'm still entirely convinced that Pooky/Alisae are trying to wrangle the game and town into a favorable state for scum.

SUSP

In post 321, OutWorldER wrote:

In post 312, MURDERCAT wrote:

In post 308, OutWorldER wrote:Like, I don't know how to get through to you all that hedging all of our bets on Task Completion and almost entirely ignoring traditional scumhunting is bad in a closed setup and the people who are pushing No Elim are probably scum.

Agree but disagree that the people pushing no elim are scum. Except cake who is scum.

I'd be down for a Cakez elim.

I'm still entirely convinced that Pooky/Alisae are trying to wrangle the game and town into a favorable state for scum.

salty I called your case illogical?