Page 13 of 90

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 6:28 am
by flow trap
In post 298, Salsabil Faria wrote:
In post 281, flow trap wrote:Because I was pretending to be new?
town don't pretend?
NTS?

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 6:29 am
by Prism
I'm actually not inclined to give this slot time to recenter.
In post 89, flow trap wrote:Can we not kill the experienced player?
In post 91, safebet222 wrote:
In post 90, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:VOTE: safebet222

Random Fact about Iceland: Iceland has gone to war 3 times over cod from 1958 to 1976.
See... Told you no one would hammer.

UNVOTE: flow trap
In post 92, flow trap wrote:I was tempted to
I strongly doubt the third post in light of the first.

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 6:31 am
by flow trap
In post 301, Prism wrote:I'm actually not inclined to give this slot time to recenter.
In post 89, flow trap wrote:Can we not kill the experienced player?
In post 91, safebet222 wrote:
In post 90, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:VOTE: safebet222

Random Fact about Iceland: Iceland has gone to war 3 times over cod from 1958 to 1976.
See... Told you no one would hammer.

UNVOTE: flow trap
In post 92, flow trap wrote:I was tempted to
I strongly doubt the third post in light of the first.
I want to go out on my own terms

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 6:32 am
by Prism
I disagree with safebet and Spartan both on esoteric. Reaction is pretty natural to seeing someone immediately put at E-1 regardless of what Safe flips. The fact they're continuing to sound the alarm into the present page suggests it is legitimate.

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 6:33 am
by flow trap
In post 303, Prism wrote:The fact they're continuing to sound the alarm into the present page suggests it is legitimate.
I agree, also the lack of resistance worried me

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 6:33 am
by flow trap
In post 303, Prism wrote:The fact they're continuing to sound the alarm into the present page suggests it is legitimate.
I agree, also the lack of resistance worried me

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 6:34 am
by flow trap
What is with the sudden double post glitch?

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 6:34 am
by Spartan117
In post 299, flow trap wrote:
In post 297, Spartan117 wrote:
In post 294, flow trap wrote:Well, we
are
still talking about it so it definitely got reactions out of almost everyone
Would you agree that there are different kinds of emotions, that there is a difference between reactions now after the fact and reactions at the time when there is more pressure and reactions are more honest.
Yes, yes, no
You don't agree that reactions are more honest at the time when a situation is more pressurised like when you was put on L-1?

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 6:37 am
by flow trap
In post 307, Spartan117 wrote:You don't agree that reactions are more honest at the time when a situation is more pressurised like when you was put on L-1?
Mine weren't :good:

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 6:38 am
by Salsabil Faria
In post 286, flow trap wrote:
In post 284, Prism wrote:I don't really get why there's a question mark there. I'm asking about what you were thinking during your first two votes. "Because I was pretending to be new" is a deeper purpose in contrast to the "Nothing" you originally gave.

Looking at page 4 and the posts around here you seem to be annoyed by the votes on you. Looking at your comment about being an experienced player, you might need to recenter to first principles. Being dismissive of questions doesn't really help as either alignment. It's better to be straightforward and eliminate the guesswork.
If I'm not answering a question it means it's worse for me to answer it
Town doesn't need to think these types of 'image-conscious' things, but for a scum, it makes sense. What are you doing is redirecting others' attention from you.

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 6:38 am
by flow trap
I guess your right though, don't want to do a special pleasing fallacy

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 6:39 am
by Prism
In post 254, Spartan117 wrote:I feel like there is 1 scum between Flow trap Vs Sal.
I don't see it as Scum Vs Scum, and it just doesn't feel like Town Vs Town to me.

Other than that my main scum reads are EZ who I feel is being disingenuous in relation to that early waggon and has felt fake in some of their posts, and Fredrick who has been lurking and still yet to provide any meaningful content, could be typical scum trying to stay under the radar while still seeming active.
Can you be more specific as to what makes this feel like not town v. town to you? I don't like flow individually but that conversation as a whole seems plausibly TvT to me. It also looks like you don't have a specific one in mind, as neither are your top scumreads.

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 6:40 am
by flow trap
In post 309, Salsabil Faria wrote:What are you doing is redirecting others' attention from you.
Literally the opposite :facepalm:

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 6:40 am
by Salsabil Faria
In post 300, flow trap wrote:
In post 298, Salsabil Faria wrote:
In post 281, flow trap wrote:Because I was pretending to be new?
town don't pretend?
NTS?
NTS= :?:

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 6:41 am
by fferyllt
Vote Count 1-5
Image


The former subjects of the Kings of Norway didn't receive a fond farewell from their homeland. Within a hundred years of Iceland's settlement Norwegian kings had set out to influence and pressure the small enclave of former subjects. It started in the year 1000, when King Olaf Tryggvason pressured the island to Christianize. King Olaf was also largely responsible for the Christianization of Norway, itself. When early efforts failed, he adopted a more aggressive stance towards the Icelanders. He refused Icelandic seafarers access to Norwegian ports and took as hostages several Icelanders then dwelling in Norway. This cut off all trade between Iceland and its main trading partner.


flow trap
(2): floo, Enchant
esotericzoomer
(2): Spartan117, safebet222
floo
(1): Fredrick A Campbell
Enchant
(1): flow trap

Not Voting
(3): Salsabil Faria, Prism, esotericzoomer


With 9 alive, it takes 5 to eliminate.



Deadline: January 23, Midnight US Eastern Time.

Countdown: (expired on 2021-01-22 21:00:00)

Mod Notes:

- :]

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 6:41 am
by flow trap
No true Scottsman

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 6:48 am
by Salsabil Faria
In post 315, flow trap wrote:
No true Scottsman
Well, it was not NTS. You're acting mysteriously.

In post 300, flow trap wrote:
In post 298, Salsabil Faria wrote:
In post 281, flow trap wrote:Because I was pretending to be new?
town don't pretend?
NTS?

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 6:48 am
by Spartan117
In post 306, flow trap wrote:What is with the sudden double post glitch?
Its to get your post count up, something decided it wasn't high enough :lol:

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 6:49 am
by Salsabil Faria
In post 317, Spartan117 wrote:
In post 306, flow trap wrote:What is with the sudden double post glitch?
Its to get your post count up, something decided it wasn't high enough :lol:
:lol: :lol:

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 6:50 am
by flow trap
In post 316, Salsabil Faria wrote:Well, it was not NTS. You're acting mysteriously.
1. Town does not pretend
2. I am town & I pretended
3. I am not truely town

NTS fallacy

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 6:55 am
by Salsabil Faria
In post 319, flow trap wrote:
In post 316, Salsabil Faria wrote:Well, it was not NTS. You're acting mysteriously.
1. Town does not pretend
2. I am town & I pretended
3. I am not truely town

NTS fallacy
Hell no! what you said in post , specially with the question mark, is exactly sounding like this: "maybe I was pretending to be new". And I said town doesn't need to pretend. Your mysterious staff is making it hard to read you, which I find annoying at the moment. :yawn:

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 6:56 am
by flow trap
In post 320, Salsabil Faria wrote:"maybe I was pretending to be new"
It was "Is this what you want from me?"

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 6:58 am
by Salsabil Faria
In post 282, flow trap wrote:Here's my pair analysis, yellow is unlikely

Image
I don't get this. Can you/anyone explain me with words?

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 6:59 am
by Salsabil Faria
In post 321, flow trap wrote:
In post 320, Salsabil Faria wrote:"maybe I was pretending to be new"
It was "Is this what you want from me?"
If you say so, but it wasn't sound like this.

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 7:00 am
by flow trap
In post 322, Salsabil Faria wrote:
In post 282, flow trap wrote:Here's my pair analysis, yellow is unlikely

Image
I don't get this. Can you/anyone explain me with words?
Cross pair elimination, take the yellow square on A2, if you trace it back it goes to Salsa+Enchant, which means I find them unlikely to be a pair