Mafiascum.net

I don't know whata neighborhood is.

In post 294, Enchant wrote:Jokes aside, who is your scumread also, expect for me and T3 of course

is this so you can kill them at night before i can get to them? very sneaky

T3 actually feels like he's been wearing heavy clunky armour and had a defensive riot shield up from the start of this game

Do you think he is Cop?

maybe like a wolf cop

In post 127, T3 wrote:

In post 126, Anya wrote:VOTE: T3

already complaining about being caught early in the pit fall

we should throw in the cement

I'm not complaining. Etine voted me for an invalid reason and then DeathNote and Windows also vote me without explanation.

In post 129, T3 wrote:I.. didn't ask why. I responded to something another player said with a valid reason.

You lost opportonity to joke about WereCop.

Also, i see where it comes, just looking at his ISO. Like half of his posts including "I didn't", "I just" and other shit. But most insulting is...

In post 127, T3 wrote: Enchat

T3, you win!
VOTE: T3

You came late and full focus on mechtalk?
VOTE: NDMath

Why people bully T3. Is it a meme?

Anya makes a very good point ref T3, he has now defended two players (defended NDMath against my vote earlier)

I gave him benefit of the doubt over NDMath as he was bringing relevant meta info to the table, but I am more dubious of his defence of enchant

In post 305, Kerset wrote:You came late and full focus on mechtalk?
VOTE: NDMath

Agreed.

Lowkey townpoints for STD - his quesiton to etine was incisive

VOTE: Etine

I reckon you were spitballing ref having 4 SRs and I reckon town!you backs down when called out on it rather than choosing a random low-activity slot to make up the numbers

In post 307, Marky Mark wrote:Anya makes a very good point ref T3, he has now defended two players (defended NDMath against my vote earlier)

I gave him benefit of the doubt over NDMath as he was bringing relevant meta info to the table, but I am more dubious of his defence of enchant

That wasn't meat to defend enchant.

The original tone of 286 felt defensive but I guess thats subjective as it comes down to how you interpret "all that Enchant was doing"

Ahhhh I don't really mind if ppl scumread me but I do mind that my words aren't being considered. Even if I'm scum I would have to talk about people, if you think I'm scum and my reads are all wrong and stuff then I would be at the least humored by it!

Etine if you start attacking T3, people will townread you

I don't need to explain why your scum reads are bad when you've premptive-ly explained it yourself

In post 257, Etine wrote:I just didn't wanna seem like a fibber so I ISO'd someone and saw she had low content and lo and behold my 4th spot LOL

In post 314, Marky Mark wrote:I don't need to explain why your scum reads are bad when you've premptive-ly explained it yourself

In post 257, Etine wrote:I just didn't wanna seem like a fibber so I ISO'd someone and saw she had low content and lo and behold my 4th spot LOL

Bad as in like they're wrong bad or my reasoning is bad cuz yeah I've definitely talked about T3/Nero Cain

In post 313, Kerset wrote:Etine if you start attacking T3, people will townread you

WTF I did that earlier and my vote is still on him LMAO

In post 315, Etine wrote:Bad as in like they're wrong bad or my reasoning is bad cuz yeah I've definitely talked about T3/Nero Cain

Bad as in you admitted you manufactured the DCL read by looking at low-activity slots to find a 4th SR. The others are your opinion and I'm less bothered about those

This isn't about your actual SRs being wrong, its about you manufacturing SRs to make up the numbers when you got called out

I think mark might be scum here - something feels off but idk if thats just me being from the town pov of not having them conftown to me but i have my eye on that slot as of now because they do feel different from when I was scum against them in the past.

In post 305, Kerset wrote:You came late and full focus on mechtalk?
VOTE: NDMath

thats how ndmath is

Odds are in a 21 Player game a low-activity slot can be scum..

In post 320, Etine wrote:Odds are in a 21 Player game a low-activity slot can be scum..

OK, why did you think that specific particular low-activity slot and not any other?

In post 318, WindowsXP wrote:I think mark might be scum here - something feels off but idk if thats just me being from the town pov of not having them conftown to me but i have my eye on that slot as of now because they do feel different from when I was scum against them in the past.

When you said you were a PR beginning with M, I did wonder if that was a mailman reference

It's just the one I happened to ISO and then decided oh maybe this one. I see your concern about it and stuff but lemme be a bit more serious

*Puts serious face on*

I care more about how you feel about my scumreads and less about how I presented them. Let's go back to what I was responding to u about before: are my reads just bad cause they're wrong? I don't get the impression you believe that so if you somehow dooo..why do you disagree? Do you think T3/Nero Cain are townie? Rathe?

Look mate, stop trying to deflect this onto your actual SRs. It was never about that. It was about you manufacturing an SR by choosing a random inactive player after someone called you out on your 4 SRs statement