Mafiascum.net

VC 1.05

Flubbernugget (4):

Umlaut 29, T3 113, Vulture 152, Alchemist21 226

ChaosOmega (2):

Lukewarm 259, Aristeia 262

Seanzie (2):

Gamma Emerald 13, Flubbernugget 26

Umlaut (1):

Titus 74

Alchemist21 (1):

Seanzie 12

Titus (1):

MegAzumarill 142

Lukewarm (1):

ChaosOmega 261

MegAzumarill (1):

Datisi 286

not voting:

with 13 alive it takes 7 to destroy.

deadline:

(expired on 2021-08-08 18:55:00)

wukelarm

are you trying to

pocket me

I shouldn't say.

Btw don’t mind the avatar change too much, I’d been meaning to change it for a while and figured at least for a little bit to adapt to what my present company seems to be.

In post 301, Datisi wrote:wukelarm

are you trying to

pocket me

Desperately

In post 302, T3 wrote:I shouldn't say.

How so? The more you evade, the more I’ll be convinced of my own picture of the situation, and trust me, it wouldn’t be a good one for you.

come on luke you can put a bit more effort into it

In post 306, Datisi wrote:come on luke you can put a bit more effort into it

I was a little worried that if I tried any harder, I would be stepping on Aristeia's toes

In post 305, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 302, T3 wrote:I shouldn't say.

How so? The more you evade, the more I’ll be convinced of my own picture of the situation, and trust me, it wouldn’t be a good one for you.

*confusion*
It defeats the purpose.

In post 307, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 306, Datisi wrote:come on luke you can put a bit more effort into it

I was a little worried that if I tried any harder, I would be stepping on Aristeia's toes

So, I am taking a different approach, so I can pocket you both at the same time

In post 308, T3 wrote:

In post 305, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 302, T3 wrote:I shouldn't say.

How so? The more you evade, the more I’ll be convinced of my own picture of the situation, and trust me, it wouldn’t be a good one for you.

*confusion*
It defeats the purpose.

Then why say anything about it in the first place?

So I think what I thought was going on is not going on and is something completely different that doesn't involve this game at all.

ok i'm done bullshitting

luke, i do want you to elaborate on that townread bc i just searched "dat" in your iso and all i saw was mysterious "mindmeld" and i know you're supposed to be smart n stuff so like

._.

In post 236, Alchemist21 wrote:

In post 235, Umlaut wrote:

In post 225, Alchemist21 wrote:

In post 218, Datisi wrote:i currently have about 8 scumleans and 3/4ths of a townread

can whoever is town here start acting like it

Sounds like a you problem.

What's the point of this reply?

The point is that if he’s scumreading 8 slots then his idea of scumminess is way too broad and he needs to figure out where he’s going wrong instead of putting it on everyone else.

In post 132, Alchemist21 wrote:But Titus since you’re here got any reads to share?

In post 186, Alchemist21 wrote:Can you go over your reasons for all your reads?

In post 189, Alchemist21 wrote:

In post 187, Aristeia wrote:T3 I'm not quite as comfortable with but they've all done independently townish things that remind me of their towngames.

Can you show me which T3 posts looked Towny to you?

Outside of that and your read on me my reads are at about the same place but with different levels of confidence.

I think my main problem with Alch here is that even though they are posting frequently, their posts are primarily just asking for other people to elaborate. I also disagree with the criticism of Datsi having a large number of SRs early on. I find that kind of behavior natural of townies.

I understand I may come off as distant from this game and not really trying to solve, but until my V/LA is up I can't really do much. I'm going to try to solve this more when I get the time.

In post 312, Datisi wrote:ok i'm done bullshitting

luke, i do want you to elaborate on that townread bc i just searched "dat" in your iso and all i saw was mysterious "mindmeld" and i know you're supposed to be smart n stuff so like

A part of it is that a lot of your posts align with my own thought process.

But you also appear to be actively hunting, and using your vote for pressure. So far, you have voted all of Flubber, T3, Chaos, Gamma, and Meg, and each time the vote made sense and appeared to have purpose, and none really felt like the kind of votes I expect scum to make.

In post 314, MegAzumarill wrote:I think my main problem with Alch here is that even though they are posting frequently, their posts are primarily just asking for other people to elaborate. I also disagree with the criticism of Datsi having a large number of SRs early on. I find that kind of behavior natural of townies.

Yes, I ask people to elaborate so I can understand them better. I also didn’t say Datisi was being scummy, I was saying the number of scumreads is problematic and the issue is on his end, not ours.

I’ve also done more than just ask for elaboration from people, but I don’t think you actually read the game carefully; I think you just skimmed through it.

In post 315, Lukewarm wrote:none really felt like the kind of votes I expect scum to make.

Like, you did not parking your vote on the biggest wagon, and were actually the first person to make comments that lead to the Flubber wagon losing steam.

You have not been making safe votes by putting been voting consensus reads or joining pushes that already have steam - you were the first vote on T3, first vote on Gamma, first vote on Chaos, and the first vote on Meg,

@Meg, current thoughts on Titus?

alright fine

as a whole, i don't think those are *great* reasons to townread me, but from someone who is encountering me as a player for the first time, i think it's a definitely plausible way of thinking

i don't think scum!luke would randomly make the "wow datisi is my top town" comment because i don't think i hold too much influence right now and not like luke is in any danger (other than being voted by omega, and like. meh.)

like it feels more likely to be town reacting to something they liked in the moment rather than scum seeing an opening and going for it

i feel like i saw something from luke earlier that made me go "hmm?" in a bad way, but i cannot remember rn what it was so maybe it wasn't that important, i'll give this game a closer look tomorrow, i don't feel like efforting tonight

In post 311, T3 wrote:So I think what I thought was going on is not going on and is something completely different that doesn't involve this game at all.

You thought it had importance once, now let the rest of us decide.

3 minutes after i posted that i thought "but what if i AM getting pocketed tho?" and ugh life is pain

@Meg why is your vote still on Titus?

In post 320, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 311, T3 wrote:So I think what I thought was going on is not going on and is something completely different that doesn't involve this game at all.

You thought it had importance once, now let the rest of us decide.

It will become clear later.

Fair enough, but don’t be lying, I expect clarification when the time is right.