Mafiascum.net

In post 90, Gypyx wrote:

In post 85, Infinity 324 wrote:let's try this again

VOTE: thor

i felt like his joking scumclaim and desire to have the town all join the mafia was a bit too genuine

why is bugspray scum

mostly the switch spary does between "shitpost mode" and "serious mode"

In post 54, bugspray wrote:VOTE: Thor
Guess I might as well play to my wincon if it means I can policy yeet an alt

like, it's not saying they'll "play to wincon" that really makes me raise eyebrows, more the fact that they bother stating it out loud (or anything of the sort really)

and just as i'm stating that i'm realising it's more common than i originally thought, but idk

In post 94, Gypyx wrote:

In post 92, Infinity 324 wrote:I'm assuming it's cause they weren't gonna play to wincon before cause they wanted to try to hydra with scum?

it's more of a "actively aiming to appear as a certain thingy (in our case a sorta detached townie"m)"
got no problem with players shitposting that they wanna play with scum


And yeah sure go ahead Rhor Tagnarok

In post 125, Gypyx wrote:

In post 111, Jessica Rabbit wrote:

In post 107, Infinity 324 wrote:I don't see why he can't just be lying? He's almost telling people to not vote him

To me it read, that he will hydra with the scum he thinks is voting him and obvscum as revenge, which isn’t the same.

I think that scum probably would play differently in this setup? Don’t you?

idk, if he's scum, that's kind of an "up in the air" promise isn't it? Unless you think that's mindset indicative? Which i don't think it really is, but that's just opinions at this point

In post 304, Dwlee99 wrote:My scumread of Gypyx here is because he is completely absent right now.

In post 305, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 304, Dwlee99 wrote:My scumread of Gypyx here is because he is completely absent right now.

why is being absent worse than being here and not solving? lol

@enchant you're in my poe and you're playing anti town

In post 306, Enchant wrote:randomquessing

In post 307, Enchant wrote:

In post 305, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 304, Dwlee99 wrote:My scumread of Gypyx here is because he is completely absent right now.

why is being absent worse than being here and not solving? lol

@enchant you're in my poe and you're playing anti town

Imagine eluminating Jester for acting like Jester.

If you are still town, you will be dissapointed.

In post 289, Enchant wrote:

In post 287, Jessica Rabbit wrote:VOTE: No Elim

If we get this wrong, we lose.

Interesting.

Why you want no-elim? What it will give?

In post 293, Enchant wrote:Because i was on 1% of charge on phone and didn't see that.
I quickhammer when it have sense or fun. If i quickhammer town here (and unless you are suicidal mafia, which is unlikely) it's possible lose to me. Unless i get nightkilled, which mafia will avoid most certranly.


No-Elim is mistake. Situation will not change, we just lose 1 member and we STILL end up in bad situation (6 town vs 2 mafia, after elumination 5vs2, + nightkill 4vs2, and welcome to "how the hell we quess mafia with so many members).

It's easier to deduce mafia in 3townvs2maf situation than in 4townvs2maf and stakes are same: Right or get dunked.

In post 318, Jessica Rabbit wrote:

In post 289, Enchant wrote:

In post 287, Jessica Rabbit wrote:VOTE: No Elim

If we get this wrong, we lose.

Interesting.

Why you want no-elim? What it will give?

Because we lose if we miselim.

In post 321, Dwlee99 wrote:We have one mislim left that you throw away by no limming here.

In post 276, Jessica Rabbit wrote:

In post 271, Thor Ragnarok wrote:Maybe Enchant?

T3, how confident are you on your Enchant locktown read? What has he done here that’s super townie?