Mini Normal 2248 | A Member Of The Arsonists | Town wins

[DArby]

That's fine. I'm in no rush to make a legit wagon. This is just where I'm happy to leave my vote now.

[T3]

I've got no idea what Darby's doing and I find it really scummy and I don't really know why nil

[Pan Smierc]

Mind you- fypov one of those slots are confirmed green (yourself!) So whats up darby? Am i talking too much? Being too aggressive?
Gonna pull out a noob reason on me?

I'm not a fan of your play style, no, but my vote is specifically on how sporadic your style is. You come across as unreliable to the town so you're able to backtrackasier if hard pushed. I don't trust that.

Fucking cope with it.
You can call it whatever it is but don't claim your push on me isnt for playstyle reasons.
If you want to find scum i suggest you put your fee fees away and learn to play with people who take initiative in a hard way. Also those people tend to be town

[DArby]

I've got no idea what Darby's doing and I find it really scummy and I don't really know why nil

What do you not understand?

[DArby]

Mind you- fypov one of those slots are confirmed green (yourself!) So whats up darby? Am i talking too much? Being too aggressive?
Gonna pull out a noob reason on me?

I'm not a fan of your play style, no, but my vote is specifically on how sporadic your style is. You come across as unreliable to the town so you're able to backtrackasier if hard pushed. I don't trust that.

Fucking cope with it.
You can call it whatever it is but don't claim your push on me isnt for playstyle reasons.
If you want to find scum i suggest you put your fee fees away and learn to play with people who take initiative in a hard way. Also those people tend to be town

It’s reductionist to say my entire argument is based solely off of your play style when I broke down my gut read of why I don’t trust you.

Im not going to argue with you like this. If you have something specific you have a problem with what I said, let’s talk about it.

[Pan Smierc]

ellaborate then my good sir.
I await what i expect to be highly intelligent analysis that proved i am without a doubt scum

[lendunistus]

Mini Normal 2248 Official Vote Count - 1.8

DArby

(3): Thynhith, T3, cool cookie

Not_Mafia

(3): mozamis, Klick, Not_Mafia

Pan Smierc

(2): Save The Dragons, DArby

Save The Dragons

(1): Pan Smierc

cool cookie

(1): Egix96

Not Voting

(1): ben dover123

With 11 alive, it takes 6 to eliminate.

Deadline

: (expired on 2021-11-13 17:00:00)

Joint moderator ISO

[lendunistus]

mozamis and cool cookie have been prodded. This is their first prod.

[T3]

Well I would rather set up a gamestate that helps us overall solve the game than lazily waste the important info gathering day

Okay wait I’ve seen you do this before you’re town

[DArby]

wah wah
In the latter quote the implication was "scummy in the way scum usually think they can push on/noob town will push on"
I dont explain every facet of what i mean but if you're so hopelessly lost I need to for you you only need to ask instead of assuming the worst.

I'm assuming you're an alt? It's weird being noob trolled by an account less than 3 weeks old.

42 is weird. Ben didn't like how you were posting and voted you, sure, but it was based on something rather inconsequential. If 42 is really a way to show how you're generating content, that's a poor way of doing so. If you are town, then putting suspicion on your slot is not pro-town. Not only does that waste time by having us push a town slot, but it also shows that you're unreliable. With quite literally one vote that wasn't yourself, you "outed" your playstyle already. This does not help town.

If you are scum then what you're doing is showing that you have a precedent in not having anything you say to be taken at face value. What you're allowing is if you do get seriously pushed in the future, you can say that you were once against just being scummy to create content and find "obvious noob" town to push you or something to that affect. That is, once again, not pro-town. It'd make more sense to do what T3 did in 26. Assuming T3 is town, what he's doing is pushing suspicion on a slot he does not know the alignment on. Not only will this generate content for the town (making it pro-town), but it also generates content for him, which is town indicative. He's also not making himself an untrustworthy slot, which is also pro-town. It's not helpful for the town collective for a town slot to put suspicion on themselves.

I could be missing something, and I'm always willing to learn. If there's more to this, please do point it out.

Again, I assume you're an alt so you should know this. This is not me explaining the obvious but rather

because

I think you know this, I think you're playing a gambit that you're not hinting at, which is scummy.

There's more, sure. But I don't like to wall post and this is long enough.

Well I would rather set up a gamestate that helps us overall solve the game than lazily waste the important info gathering day

Okay wait I’ve seen you do this before you’re town

Link?

[Pan Smierc]

Lets try refocusing in a way that is productive: do you think the wagon on you is pure that you're suspicious outside? At the very least i ask you to bin me until d2 at least - as a show of good faith that i am helping your wagon dissolve here and push you as town.

I know we arent going to agree on my playstyle but im willing to adjust for someone i townread - I'm an open book. I laid my hand on the table.
I like to stay 2 steps ahead of scum if i can - im just honest about the manipulative tactics i use because im.not on my main and people on this playerlist are less accustomed to my playstyle.

[Pan Smierc]

I can't discuss the reasons i think you were toen before your last post that well but your latest post gave us an insight into the complex way you are approaching the game which is blindingly towny to me

[Pan Smierc]

My apologies for the aggressiveness btw its my natural way tonplay and I should be reserving it for scumreads and not townreads

[Save The Dragons]

Now they are trying to pocket Darby

[Pan Smierc]

Now they are trying to pocket Darby

Backwards conclusion

[ben dover123]

Why is darby commenting on old stuff that he probably knows I won't respond to

[DArby]

Why is darby commenting on old stuff that he probably knows I won't respond to

Because you weren’t my target audience.

[T3]

maybe I'm tunneled on Darby

[DArby]

@Pan I’m on mobile now, I’ll answer your question about my wagon soon-ish when I get back home. I don’t think I could format it well now.

In the meantime, could you elaborate on 314? I know you don’t mean I’m pocketing you, but how is it backwards?

Also, I appreciate 312. :)

[DArby]

maybe I'm tunneled on Darby

I don’t think you’d get much from me d1’s in general. I feel most of what I say is NAI and is just pointing out things.

[Pan Smierc]

@Pan I’m on mobile now, I’ll answer your question about my wagon soon-ish when I get back home. I don’t think I could format it well now.

In the meantime, could you elaborate on 314? I know you don’t mean I’m pocketing you, but how is it backwards?

Also, I appreciate 312.

I was saying that the accusation is clearly working with the conclusion i am scum and working backwards rather than a genuine read on what I'm doing.
as in its just twisting actions to fit a theory they want rather than analyzing actions to build a theory.

[T3]

I've got no idea what Darby's doing and I find it really scummy and I don't really know why nil

What do you not understand?

I get what you’re saying about your activity being nai

[Save The Dragons]

@Pan I’m on mobile now, I’ll answer your question about my wagon soon-ish when I get back home. I don’t think I could format it well now.

In the meantime, could you elaborate on 314? I know you don’t mean I’m pocketing you, but how is it backwards?

Also, I appreciate 312.

I was saying that the accusation is clearly working with the conclusion i am scum and working backwards rather than a genuine read on what I'm doing.
as in its just twisting actions to fit a theory they want rather than analyzing actions to build a theory.

I'm allowed to do 4that because I already posted a genuine read on what your alignment is based on your actions

[Pan Smierc]

actions on d1 are not alignment indicative

explain how my thought process behind those actions are scummy.

[Save The Dragons]

Please