I don't object to letting N_M hammer.
If anyone wants to formally object do so soon or forever hold your peace
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 4:29 pm
by numberQ
I'd say we should wait for a claim at least. Though I can't tell if I'm just saying that because of site meta. What would a claim tell us, besides force the real role to counter if it exists?
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 5:54 pm
by Enchant
I am VT, have fun.
Still consider my idea, because i don't really see how it out PRs (it's very specific, and i think CRUMBS more likely to out PR actually). Because i am town and dying anyway, i suggest you to do in this order (Completly random):
1. mozamis
2. Not_Mafia
3. Galron
4. PenguinPower
5. numberQ
6. redtea
7. MegAzumarill
8. ssbm_Kyouko
9. Almost50
10. Egix96
11. Gamma Emerald
12. Roden
So mafia doesh't just assume someone is PR for "posting too fast" or "posting too late" and other.
If this idea is "Chaotic".
Well. Really, do you find SO HARD to make one belivable fake post or what? Complete disgrace.
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 5:55 pm
by Roden
In post 298, redtea wrote:I'm trying to see what you're getting at with if scum!enchant, then town!galron
if there's 2 scum then I get it
if there's 3 then I don't
and 3:10 is balanced right?
I usually assume the bigger number
In post 299, numberQ wrote:Well, we know it's a 3 scum team from the setup. It's just the number of PRs that's up in the air.
And I'm also unsure why scum!Enchant = town!Galron, I figured it was just because Galron is impenetrable to me but if someone else doesn't see it either then maybe it's just a confusing read.
I should've clarified this better but I was in a rush to post.
My thought process behind scum!Enchant = town!Galron is that it doesn't make sense for them to be competing SvS wagons. The third scum buddy wouldn't try to counter wagon scum!Galron with scum!Enchant, especially when nobody's really talking and there's so little content that they could easily just push a townie with little to no consequences. Wouldn't hurt to send an invest PR his way regardless of Enchant's flip though.
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 5:56 pm
by Roden
Enchant, if you're town then you should start questioning your scum reads.
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 5:56 pm
by Enchant
Don't send invest PRs on scummy players, send them on null.
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 5:59 pm
by numberQ
I'm doubting my vote. I don't know if scum doubles down on the crumbing strategy after no one agreed with it.
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 5:59 pm
by Enchant
Or even better, don't even tell what they should do, lel.
Also, nah, i have no idea. Still misplayed when i didn't let hammer Gamma i think.
Gamma chances being mafia higher than my chances being mafia.
In theory i should have hammered to avoid this situation at first place (even if town i atleast tried, if scum i am not going on chupping block). Considering love of mafia to bus each other on day1 and then changing votes, i think Gamma could be maf distancing, but not sure here, whatever.
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 6:05 pm
by Enchant
Oh sorry. LET Gamma be hammered.
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 6:06 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 305, Roden wrote:Enchant, if you're town then you should start questioning your scum reads.
Gamma chances being mafia higher than my chances being mafia.
In theory i should have hammered to avoid this situation at first place (even if town i atleast tried, if scum i am not going on chupping block). Considering love of mafia to bus each other on day1 and then changing votes, i think Gamma could be maf distancing, but not sure here, whatever.
Sure but the gamma lim came way too close imo for it to be a bus
it's not like gamma was a lost cause
Gamma chances being mafia higher than my chances being mafia.
In theory i should have hammered to avoid this situation at first place (even if town i atleast tried, if scum i am not going on chupping block). Considering love of mafia to bus each other on day1 and then changing votes, i think Gamma could be maf distancing, but not sure here, whatever.
Sure but the gamma lim came way too close imo for it to be a bus
it's not like gamma was a lost cause
I don't think mafia expect from me to help NM with quickhammer.
In post 298, redtea wrote:I'm trying to see what you're getting at with if scum!enchant, then town!galron
if there's 2 scum then I get it
if there's 3 then I don't
and 3:10 is balanced right?
I usually assume the bigger number
In post 299, numberQ wrote:Well, we know it's a 3 scum team from the setup. It's just the number of PRs that's up in the air.
And I'm also unsure why scum!Enchant = town!Galron, I figured it was just because Galron is impenetrable to me but if someone else doesn't see it either then maybe it's just a confusing read.
I should've clarified this better but I was in a rush to post.
My thought process behind scum!Enchant = town!Galron is that it doesn't make sense for them to be competing SvS wagons. The third scum buddy wouldn't try to counter wagon scum!Galron with scum!Enchant, especially when nobody's really talking and there's so little content that they could easily just push a townie with little to no consequences. Wouldn't hurt to send an invest PR his way regardless of Enchant's flip though.
gootcha
I have my doubts that one really has much to do with the other in that way, since the Galron wagon hasnt gone beyond even 2 votes. Otherwise there'd definitely be some stuff to dig into there, yeah.
But like statistically speaking it ain't likely SvS anyway.
Well, gonna be honest, i don't consider even 5 votes serious, as well as anything happened at day 1 at all.
I see mafia distancing on Day 1 so often (yes even like that), i don't consider this clear. I more surprised how fast Gamma wagon dismantled after that danger.
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 8:06 pm
by redtea
why do you sr gamma again
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 8:07 pm
by redtea
like yn it was just supposed to be a pressure wagon