Mafiascum.net

In post 256, Isis wrote:

In post 222, skitter30 wrote:@gl i guess when i read 157 and 158 the emphasis seems to be more on defending isis than questioning the votes on her, if that makes sense

Also did you have a problem with my vote on her?

In post 207, GuiltyLion wrote:Isis, meh 144 felt like it was just giving a random read rather than meant to push the game any sort of which way from it so I care less about it.

I mean i had voted her prior to this and she didnt react to that at all and instead just threw a vague townread on me which is ? to me

you've aggroed me so many times that my emotional reaction was lol

but like if some things youve put together get me to e2 or whatever i will look at the core of your beliefs and try to defuse

you had lots of independent content for me to form a gut take on that i ddidn't to resort to interpret based on your read of me which I trust less to do in an unbiased way

In post 267, Aristeia wrote:

In post 251, Isis wrote:I know there's a false positive rate to it but I'd be pretty ok killing someone for posting this
more specifically i can just
visualize scumskitter posting it and townskitter not
it's like
text indicating suspicion on her just has higher priority for interpretation than other content, causing the egregious error (she's clearly not kidding? both in structure and it's not remotely skitter's brand of humor, she's not really a court jester)
I don't think Aris posted suspicion about skit at any point
I know i'm gonna get mudslapped for level -1 gawtcha reads

ok so this might be stupid and I will look bad for thinking this if skitter is actually mafia

but I think scum!her is more careful about posting things like this whereas town!her is more off the cuff and jokey.

In post 243, Meuh wrote:Nah but I hadn't checked it, I remembered GL voting me but I forgot how adamant he was about it all

In post 244, Meuh wrote:

In post 238, Pavowski wrote:I am joining the Marci is Town crew after 233

We should make some t-shirts

Spoiler:

In post 249, Isis wrote:

In post 170, marcistar wrote:isis posts too much words but ends up saying nothing of value most of the time, but the rare post where theres value I like so isis town question mark?

meuh, i cant explain it.. like her posts dont really look bad at a glance... but something deep down is telling me we've got to be wary about her.

have we played before or no, you changed your avatar so i can't store and retrieve that information well

only curiuos i dont think it affects the game

In post 257, Aristeia wrote:

In post 235, marcistar wrote:i still stand by it, but i still stand by lions using shitty reasoning, he needs to get sumn better on her.
and wtf stop stealing my reads!@#@!@#! im the hard carry this game

I was simply pre-emptively sheeping the Greatness known as Marci.

I have not even voted for GLion because I am waiting for Marci to vote him first so I can properly sheep her.

In post 258, Aristeia wrote:I think we just win the game if we eliminate Pavo + GL

In post 305, marcistar wrote:

In post 243, Meuh wrote:Nah but I hadn't checked it, I remembered GL voting me but I forgot how adamant he was about it all

who tf did u think pushed the wagon then :person_standing:

anyways the reason i asked is because the vibes i got werent the tasiest, it felt like you were trying to hop on the chance of the "minidefense" i did of you, and twist it into a bigger advantage than it already was.

In post 251, Isis wrote:

In post 183, skitter30 wrote:

In post 181, GuiltyLion wrote:is it the worst?

No i'm p sure she means me lol

I know there's a false positive rate to it but I'd be pretty ok killing someone for posting this
more specifically i can just
visualize scumskitter posting it and townskitter not
it's like
text indicating suspicion on her just has higher priority for interpretation than other content, causing the egregious error (she's clearly not kidding? both in structure and it's not remotely skitter's brand of humor, she's not really a court jester)
I don't think Aris posted suspicion about skit at any point
I know i'm gonna get mudslapped for level -1 gawtcha reads

but i know swift
actually i don't know swift i can't just be quiet and vig on the opinion that's how that metaphor would work

i know rest

howzabout that

In post 266, Isis wrote:VOTE: skitter

i don't think this will take off

but i think i can incept it into eLo

In post 270, Isis wrote:

In post 183, skitter30 wrote:

In post 181, GuiltyLion wrote:is it the worst?

No i'm p sure she means me lol

this is the post

when you deliver a joke you do not laugh at your own joke

it's a core rule of humor

Jimmy Fallon does so and it is remarked upon as the exception that proves the rule

In post 299, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 230, marcistar wrote:whats ur thoughts on the worst

no thoughts head empty
He’s like a late-game sort for me most times

In post 309, marcistar wrote:

In post 258, Aristeia wrote:I think we just win the game if we eliminate Pavo + GL

i dont think so tbhs

why do u think pav?

In post 302, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: meuh
This is me kinda going off of what GL and marci have said, specifically marci saying she gives off (paraphrasing) “okay but not great” vibes
Feel like that’s a sign of scum in most cases
Normally I wouldn’t opt for this sort of elim early but this game is special

In post 303, the worst wrote:VOTE: Meuh good call tbh, fast and loose is a much better play than slow and steady

In post 310, Meuh wrote:How would I benefit from that?

In post 201, GuiltyLion wrote:like, Meuh says she thinks Beat is town, thinks you're town and has no issue with your push on Beat

says she thinks Isis is town, has no issue with Cakez vote on Isis and actually grills me for calling it out

this is the behavior I'm pointing to when I say Meuh is looking more to make buddies than find scum, usually townies are at least somewhat suspicious of people voting and casing their townreads

In post 304, Meuh wrote:
VOTE: Gamma Emerald
Not engaging with my response to GL’s argument at all, not asking me any questions to try sorting me, just echoing what’s already been said.
You have more experience playing with me (and a more accurate history of reading me) than GL and you’ve already seen Marci’s D1 tonal reads on me be very wrong.
The fact you’re willing to just go along with this push and rely on Marci/GL would be more understandable if we had never played together.
But here, I think it’s pretty telling.

In post 314, Aristeia wrote:

In post 309, marcistar wrote:

In post 258, Aristeia wrote:I think we just win the game if we eliminate Pavo + GL

i dont think so tbhs

why do u think pav?

he feels like he is heavy on the chill/buddying and light on the solving/sorting

In post 314, Aristeia wrote:

In post 309, marcistar wrote:

In post 258, Aristeia wrote:I think we just win the game if we eliminate Pavo + GL

i dont think so tbhs

why do u think pav?

he feels like he is heavy on the chill/buddying and light on the solving/sorting

In post 320, Pavowski wrote:

In post 314, Aristeia wrote:

In post 309, marcistar wrote:

In post 258, Aristeia wrote:I think we just win the game if we eliminate Pavo + GL

i dont think so tbhs

why do u think pav?

he feels like he is heavy on the chill/buddying and light on the solving/sorting

You have correctly identified my early game meta