Mafiascum.net

In post 227, Ircher wrote:

In post 196, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:

In post 46, Ircher wrote:If not Draper, how about Porkens?

In post 48, Ircher wrote:Well Draper is making this big fuss and all, so.......

In post 50, Ircher wrote:It's not, but it's also early. There is merit in looking elsewhere.

Why are you still voting us then?

I didn't want to kill wagon momentum. It was more of a "if you rather" kind of thing. I could move now, but I don't really have a place to go with it, so....

In post 153, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:I thought both reactions looked scummy to me: Titus voting me for not doing enough by page freaking 2 and Ircher for apparently no reason whatsoever, advocating wagoning us and I still think this. I no longer think they look aligned like I’ve said recently.

Look, it was early game. I advocated for wagoning you all because I was already voting there. If I started the game voting Titus instead for instance, I would've advocated there instead.

Didn't read too much today as I had a long work day; I just searched for my username to see if anything pressing came up.

In post 291, Ircher wrote:Posts 64 and 111. While I don't necessarily disagree with the argument, I do believe that Titus's conviction is too strong especially given how often Titus has played with you.

In post 303, Porkens wrote:Kinda seems like it

In post 295, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:Discussed with Don. Intent to vote Ircher.

-Mistress

In post 301, Titus wrote:

In post 227, Ircher wrote:

In post 196, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:

In post 46, Ircher wrote:If not Draper, how about Porkens?

In post 48, Ircher wrote:Well Draper is making this big fuss and all, so.......

In post 50, Ircher wrote:It's not, but it's also early. There is merit in looking elsewhere.

Why are you still voting us then?

I didn't want to kill wagon momentum. It was more of a "if you rather" kind of thing. I could move now, but I don't really have a place to go with it, so....

In post 153, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:I thought both reactions looked scummy to me: Titus voting me for not doing enough by page freaking 2 and Ircher for apparently no reason whatsoever, advocating wagoning us and I still think this. I no longer think they look aligned like I’ve said recently.

Look, it was early game. I advocated for wagoning you all because I was already voting there. If I started the game voting Titus instead for instance, I would've advocated there instead.

Didn't read too much today as I had a long work day; I just searched for my username to see if anything pressing came up.

In post 291, Ircher wrote:Posts 64 and 111. While I don't necessarily disagree with the argument, I do believe that Titus's conviction is too strong especially given how often Titus has played with you.

These don't seem congruent with each other.

In post 308, Porkens wrote:Stop tunneling

In post 309, furtiveglance wrote:

In post 308, Porkens wrote:Stop tunneling

Gamestate is just a bit stale, I don't know how to change it

In post 300, Aisa wrote:

1.06

Votecount 1.06

Ircher (2):

Vanderscamp, Herta.

Titus (2):

SCRRRDBEAR, Ircher.

SCRRRDBEAR (1):

Titus.

Porkens (1):

furtiveglance.

Enchant (1):

Porkens.

Not Voting (2):

Enchant, Don Draper x Mistress.

With 9 players alive, it takes 5 to axe someone.

Day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-10-12 11:55:00).

Mod notes

The deadline was extended by 3 days to compensate for site downtime. Prods are also not being issued for a couple days.

Flavour

Tree #2 and Tree #3 live next to each other and are currently locked in a fight to see who can steal more sunlight from the other.

In post 312, Enchant wrote:I unvoted Ircher because titus would likely just hammer instantly after that vote.

In post 313, Titus wrote:

In post 312, Enchant wrote:I unvoted Ircher because titus would likely just hammer instantly after that vote.

Why? For the most part, I have townread Ircher but fir his recent movement claiming his SR was stronger than it is.

In post 315, Herta wrote:UNVOTE: Ircher

VOTE: Porkens

furtiveglance why am I voting Porkens

In post 317, Herta wrote:I'm going back to Ircher then.

VOTE: Ircher

In post 318, furtiveglance wrote:

In post 317, Herta wrote:I'm going back to Ircher then.

VOTE: Ircher

Outstanding gameplay

In post 320, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:I AM OKAY TO GET TITUS HERE MAYBE UNLESS THEY CAN RATIONALIZE THEIR PUSH ON DONDRAPE

LOOKS A LITTLE SUS IN HINDSIGHT

In post 269, Titus wrote:

In post 260, furtiveglance wrote:

In post 259, Titus wrote:Scum will favor lurker pushes here. Lurkers are more likely to give up if miseliminated. Only if scum can't get a lurker will they push active people. Hence why I FoS Bear there.

Do you think Scrrrdbear 'couldn't get' Enchant/Porkens? I'm still voting Porkens

Not without yelling and dominating. There's also the fact that Enchant is obvtown. Do you really expect Bear to be able to push a case where little to no evidence exists and there's meta evidence for town Enchant?

Porkens might be an easier sell but still would require a dramatic shift.

Third, hard pushing a lurker might draw them to play. Scum want lurkers to lurk.