man I'm having a hard time not saying the L word, is so engrained in my brain
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 9:21 pm
by Not Known 15
In post 176, Gamma Emerald wrote:also, thinking about it, Dannflor and nsg are sus for their handling of me so far
they should know how I'm liable to take early pressure, especially when it's seemingly unfounded
In post 37, Gamma Emerald wrote:And why do you not think it’s within JC/NM, or the FIVE people that picked 1?
In post 38, Gamma Emerald wrote:And it better be a good reason because I can already think of one, and it’s not a great look for you Sir Bear
IDRC ABOUT THE 1 CHOICES, I RULED THAT NUMBER OUT RIGHT AWAY.
THE SHADE IN #38 IS MORE INDICATIVE OF SCUM.
VOTE: Gamma
So, despite the statistical evidence supporting there being multiple scum in the 1s, you have somehow "ruled them out" already. Yeah that's bogus. VOTE: SCRRRDBEAR
In post 91, Gamma Emerald wrote:Clearly critical thinking is something Sir Bear is lacking in rn
In post 176, Gamma Emerald wrote:also, thinking about it, Dannflor and nsg are sus for their handling of me so far
they should know how I'm liable to take early pressure, especially when it's seemingly unfounded
In post 37, Gamma Emerald wrote:And why do you not think it’s within JC/NM, or the FIVE people that picked 1?
In post 38, Gamma Emerald wrote:And it better be a good reason because I can already think of one, and it’s not a great look for you Sir Bear
IDRC ABOUT THE 1 CHOICES, I RULED THAT NUMBER OUT RIGHT AWAY.
THE SHADE IN #38 IS MORE INDICATIVE OF SCUM.
VOTE: Gamma
So, despite the statistical evidence supporting there being multiple scum in the 1s, you have somehow "ruled them out" already. Yeah that's bogus. VOTE: SCRRRDBEAR
In post 91, Gamma Emerald wrote:Clearly critical thinking is something Sir Bear is lacking in rn
That wasn't supposed to happen like this.
Seemingly unfounded - that seemingly is unlikely to come from town.
Post 85: Votes for SCRRRDBEAR due to "ruling them out is bogus"
Post 91: Bear lacks critical thinking
If Gamma'd think that Bear lacks critical thinking then where's that scumread coming from? Opportunism, from scum.
VOTE: Gamma Emerald
In post 69, Porkens wrote:But I think I also support the junkies wagon
In post 138, Porkens wrote:And I’ll say it: if nk15 flips red, then so will nsg
In post 137, Porkens wrote:In fact I think it’s odd that you town lean that. Your explanation that you think it shows a town mindset doesn’t really hold water for me. Why would that come from town? Your explanation states:
“as though one has read through the thread, can at least see the justification for all of the rest of the reads, but can't see the reasoning for one of them. i imagine that scum trying to ask a question just to ask a question would be less likely to single out a single read from a set of them and more likely to respond to a post with basically only one point in it.“
You don’t say anything about why that is town behavior. A scum would be just as capable of honestly doing all of those things without having to fake anything. A very comfortable move for scum.
But you are also basically saying I think he is town because he did this thing I think is more likely to come from town.
Then you shit on your own read.
VOTE: NK15 that’s a scum post.
That townread based on my first post is constructed.
But other than discussing that read there is actually little content in her posts. This is scum defending themselves fulltime, and not engaging anywhere else seriously because
In post 24, Gamma Emerald wrote:But for real, either stop with the targeting or explain yourself
Well as i said i won't vote any of "masons" today for sure.
I also won't vote Rosen.
There's also specific members which i don't want to vote for example NM (also how NM and ... Which this one they both sumbitted 14 together i forgot nickname whatever)
OF GAMMA/DANNFLOR + PENGUIN/JOHNNY/KITTY ARE SCUM. IF THIS DRAFT SYSTEM HAS BEEN RUN BEFORE I'D LOVE TO SEE WHAT NUMBERS WERE CHOSEN BY SCUM IN THE PAST.
Wait what
Where you get this idea from, why scum would pick same number as teammates
Seriously?
It would be better for town if people would stop doing that - not explaining reads - because it is anti-town.
Unexplained reads can come from anyone until that idiotic meta stops existing.
Seriously?
It would be better for town if people would stop doing that - not explaining reads - because it is anti-town.
Unexplained reads can come from anyone until that idiotic meta stops existing.
I can see scum making this post. It’s both “LAMIST” and super safe content that doesn’t require a town perspective to be “constructed.”
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2022 7:41 am
by Gamma Emerald
VOTE: not known 15
I wanna explore this avenue of inquiry. On top of his not-great reactions to things, he also just feels rather flat and that's pretty consistent with my impression of scum!NK
I actually do want to deter this wagon because Roden's actions around you feel shitty and in bad faith, IDK where you got that.
mmm I feel it's weird to want to deter a wagon on me but also have me as null
I think I'm coming around to Roden's fixation being on some idea of what correct play is that's going over my head, which is probably a little more likely to come from town
also I think in general scum tend to be less likely to just shut down interaction, mafia like to look conciliatory / open / reasonable
I haven't played with Roden a lot but I feel like I remember his scum game being closer to the latter