Mafiascum.net

5th good moderation


#3000

Nominate BROseidon for

Alternatively something latin related, but I cant think of anything that fits too well on that end.

In post 2994, Kublai Khan wrote:Cfj ->

Good in Moderation

There a story here?

In post 3002, TheButtonmen wrote:

In post 2994, Kublai Khan wrote:Cfj ->

Good in Moderation

There a story here?

Um.. no?

I just made AngryPidgeon's title suggestion a little punchier.

In post 2994, Kublai Khan wrote:Cfj ->

Good in Moderation

Two things
1. Being good at moderation. Distinctive?
2. Is there anything that makes the pun appropriate for the given player, or is it just being applied because it is a great pun?

If Cfj were known for being "too much" or something, it might work.

IDGI.

Its not like I explained it or anything when I brought him up.

you explained facet uno

2nd guyett and cfj noms

I feel like people are overestimating how distinctive users even are

In post 3010, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:I feel like people are overestimating how distinctive users even are

^^^

I don't really understand / find either of the nom'd titles to be interesting, but *shrug*

In post 3010, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:I feel like people are overestimating how distinctive users even are

some of them are anyway

In post 3012, quadz08 wrote:I don't really understand / find either of the nom'd titles to be interesting, but *shrug*

guyett's is fun man

In post 3013, ~Jordan` wrote:

In post 3010, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:I feel like people are overestimating how distinctive users even are

some of them are anyway

are what, distinctive?

yes of course the users being nominated in this thread are distinctive

you people are throwing up too much of a fit about /how/ distinctive

like holy crap it's a fun jab at guyett it's fine that it doesn't encompass his entire history in ms

edit: likewise cfj

I hereby request a title change to Postman because I post in games a lot LOL

omg 2nd

and then when you are scum we can call it Mail Fraud!!!!

I really don't see why you guys are so opposed? The cfj one might be a bit forced, but Guyett's is pretty fine--he's really prolific in his drunkposting.

guyett's is fine
cfj's is great but has connotations that seem irrelevant to the title motive

I don't recall any rule that says titles can only be given out to the most interesting users

no one is claiming that only interesting people need titles

but if he doesn't like that one, I think is another great one for him.

Besides drunk posting, he is notorious for coming out of nowhere to hammer just for the sake of hammering. It happens in like every single game multiple times.

And when he gets vig, he shoots the first person he sees. It's descriptive of him enough that people make jokes about it all the time, so I don't even wanna hear about how "so and so does that too" cuz that shit is dumb and all my noms get shot down. If it fits, it fits. Who cares if someone else happens to do the same thing. If they were so known for that, then they'd have the title, wouldn't they?

And Trigger Happy can be applied to hammering for the sake of hammering as well, I think.

I like because of the wordplay. Trigger Happy suggests 'vig'; some way to combine both would be cool.