Page 121 of 233

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2018 10:53 pm
by Chara
In post 2917, Kiana Kaslana wrote:By the way, I am Vanilla Town. But my Flavour is supposed to give me a cool Role. So yes, I think you can see why I am asleep at the wheel.
i really can't. you can have fun in games without being a power role. we had fun in Purgatory and that didn't have any.

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2018 10:57 pm
by Chara
it's disappointing and i don't even know if it's scum. at the same time Kiana is one of my better guesses for red scum, and i don't really like any of her explanations for being apathetic.
giving one read is also not an unreasonable thing to ask, and the fact she can't explain one scumread (and hadn't even when she still seemed into the game) looks like it's just going through the motions.
blaming other players for being lurky to avoid doing anything herself, too.
i don't know if i'm buying Ran's explanation a little more because i can see he actually does care about the game (if he's scum there's also reason to care) but i got more of a sense that despite his inability to play at the moment it might change at some point in the future. or i just got different vibes from it.

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2018 12:51 am
by Joey_
In post 2989, Almost50 wrote:@Pidgey: OK..

VOTE: ranmaru
Werent you one of those who absolutely hard townread ranmaru early on ? Or am i thinking of someone else

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2018 12:52 am
by Joey_
We aren't lynching the only vt claim, since we can use that for later

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2018 12:53 am
by Joey_
I want to hear klazam's thoughts

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2018 1:43 am
by Chara
In post 3003, Joey_ wrote:We aren't lynching the only vt claim, since we can use that for later
how?

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2018 1:48 am
by Chara
In post 3002, Joey_ wrote:Werent you one of those who absolutely hard townread ranmaru early on ? Or am i thinking of someone else
you were thinking of Almost.

i don't like Ranmaru's lack of play either, but comparing the two i prefer Kiana. Ranmaru at least appears to plan to read later, and he's not making excuses about the gamestate (scum deaths = apathy?) for his laziness. (hurt hand notwithstanding) i can see that creating laziness, and i was worried about that, but Kiana doesn't give the impression of laziness. i think she's just upset her team is gone.

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2018 1:57 am
by brassherald
Maybe it's just me but I'm willing to allow a hurry have slide a bit for Ran, though not a long leash, but during my first game there was a snowstorm in New York, much like today, and I fell and hurt my arm. Typing was a nightmare for a few days after that

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2018 2:03 am
by Chara
In post 2916, Kiana Kaslana wrote:The reason why I joined this game only to play with you and Titus and a bit of Varsoon. Now, since I realized that playing this game isn't very necessary. So I am very bored of this game.
what do you mean not necessary?
i still want to play with you, but you're not giving me anything. and if you needed help coming up with reads, you could ask for it.

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2018 3:28 am
by Joey_
Unccd vt is clear until proven otherwise, its useful for massclaim

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2018 3:30 am
by Joey_
Quoting the mod -> “* There will be at least 1 Vanilla Townie in this game. Below is a sample Role PM of said role.”

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2018 3:32 am
by Joey_
Also if mafia don’t want kiana to ends up clear they will have to claim VT to cc her, and that is good too since 1v1 etc, a single vt claim is useful in an apparent role madness

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2018 3:34 am
by Chara
at least 1 implies more than one is possible.

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2018 3:38 am
by Joey_
In post 3012, Chara wrote:at least 1 implies more than one is possible.
Yes, but we dont know that. Even if only 3people ends up claiming VT its good, maybe if we lynch kiana no one will ever claim VT for the rest of the game. I think that a single VT can be a”named” VT, the only thing that contradicts that theory is the IC which compete for basically the same role (an IC is a named VT).
Anyway, i still think massclaiming could win us the game extremely fast but it wont happens because

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2018 3:40 am
by Joey_
Also you have to realize that forcing a vt claim from mafia is good because then they cant explain the visist if caught etc, anyway we will only know later on if im correct

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2018 4:19 am
by Chara
i'm against massclaim for today. i don't think we know enough about the setup. claiming early makes sure mafia is locked into whatever lie they give (assuming they don't claim their real role), but it also makes it difficult to catch them later because it outs all of the PRs. i don't think it can be broken with massclaim yet. this is exactly the kind of thing i worry about when seeing early scumflips. we're only about half done. :>

add that i think Kiana is scum.

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2018 4:19 am
by BuJaber
In post 3013, Joey_ wrote:
In post 3012, Chara wrote:at least 1 implies more than one is possible.
Yes, but we dont know that. Even if only 3people ends up claiming VT its good, maybe if we lynch kiana no one will ever claim VT for the rest of the game. I think that a single VT can be a”named” VT, the only thing that contradicts that theory is the IC which compete for basically the same role (an IC is a named VT).
Anyway, i still think massclaiming could win us the game extremely fast but it wont happens because

Because what?


And what gives you the idea this is role madness anyway? We still have no idea what most of the remaining players' roles are.

Better questions: what do more VT claims tell you about Kiana? Why would anybody claim it for no reason just because she did?

CCs work on PRs because there are rarely 2 of the same in one game. And even for a PR claim it is not always correct to counterclaim because the original claim might have been done by scum specifically to expose the info.

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2018 4:32 am
by Venmar
Votecount 2.8


[0] Nero Cain:

[2]
Kiana Kaslana:
Chara, Brassherald

[0] brassherald:

[0] Bujaber:

[1]
Kokichi Oma:
Shaziro

[0] Chara:

[1]
Gamma Emerald:
Titus

[0] Klazam:

[2]
Titus:
Joey_, Kokichi Oma

[1]
Shaziro:
Nero Cain

[1]
ActionDan:
marshy

[0] Joey_:

[0] pidgey:

[0] jodaxq:

[0] almost50:

[0] marshy:

:right:
[6]
ranmaru:
Jodaxq, Klazam, BuJaber, Kiana Kaslana, Gamma Emerald, Almost50


Not Voting
  • ActionDan, pidgey, ranmaru

Deadline
  • In (expired on 2018-03-27 09:00:00)
  • Tuesday, March 27th @9:00am PST
Mod Notes:
  • With 17 alive, it takes 9 votes to lynch.
  • Nero Cain is V/LA

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2018 4:33 am
by Venmar
ActionDan has been prodded.

In post 2908, Joey_ wrote:
@MOD :
Can mafia use the night kill + an abilitiy?
Can mafia use the night kill + an ability if they are the last member of their faction?
A player cannot perform two actions, factional or not, at once.

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2018 5:15 am
by Joey_
In post 3016, BuJaber wrote:
In post 3013, Joey_ wrote:
In post 3012, Chara wrote:at least 1 implies more than one is possible.
Yes, but we dont know that. Even if only 3people ends up claiming VT its good, maybe if we lynch kiana no one will ever claim VT for the rest of the game. I think that a single VT can be a”named” VT, the only thing that contradicts that theory is the IC which compete for basically the same role (an IC is a named VT).
Anyway, i still think massclaiming could win us the game extremely fast but it wont happens because

Because what?


And what gives you the idea this is role madness anyway? We still have no idea what most of the remaining players' roles are.

Better questions: what do more VT claims tell you about Kiana? Why would anybody claim it for no reason just because she did?

CCs work on PRs because there are rarely 2 of the same in one game. And even for a PR claim it is not always correct to counterclaim because the original claim might have been done by scum specifically to expose the info.
1. Educated guess
2. Nothing, its just useful for poe and massclaim
3. I disagree, ccs works on VT in this scenario (if im correct)

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2018 5:15 am
by Joey_
In post 3018, Venmar wrote:
ActionDan has been prodded.

In post 2908, Joey_ wrote:
@MOD :
Can mafia use the night kill + an abilitiy?
Can mafia use the night kill + an ability if they are the last member of their faction?
A player cannot perform two actions, factional or not, at once.
THX

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2018 5:16 am
by Joey_
This means that forcing Gamma to do provable actions means that if he is last red, he cannot makes a night kill

@Gamma : With the new info, do you agree to perform a provable action ? and if yess, do you know have roughly an idea how your action can be proven?

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2018 5:34 am
by Chara
i agree that Gamma should at least try to use something provable, though i don't think he's red mafia to begin with. but would be good to know for sure.

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2018 5:56 am
by Almost50
In post 3002, Joey_ wrote:
In post 2989, Almost50 wrote:@Pidgey: OK..

VOTE: ranmaru
Werent you one of those who absolutely hard townread ranmaru early on ? Or am i thinking of someone else
I was, but his inactivity and disinterest make me think he won't be much help even if he is Town, and knowing ranmaru he'll probably SR everyone at one point or another and WILL get lynched for it anyway.

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2018 5:58 am
by Joey_
Thats a pretty dumb reason to lynch your hard tr buddy