In post 69, BrightEyedFish wrote:I didn't think it completely through but the basic idea behind a quick lynch would be like rolling the dice and sacrificing someone before scum has a chance to setup a lynch on the 8ball target.
Mechanically it might be fine but wouldn't scum setting up a lynch on the 8ball target be somewhat obvious in hindsight?
In post 166, RadiantCowbells wrote:i think nancefloor is scummy but i also don't want to push them for reasons
And I 100% agree with you on this
The second quote just seems weird with it without the first one, doesn’t seem like they’re trying to understand RC’s perspective at all, in the first one too
In post 411, NanceFloor wrote:@Time Devil, you never actually gave the reasons why you’re sr us. Do you actually have any you’d care to share with the class?
~ND
If you're seriously death-tunneling us because you misinterpreted 250, you're obviously scum trying to push my lynch.
Don't tell me that that's not what 410 says. You've been caught.
You also seem to be very defensive, and your reads have little substance.
-TL
I don’t really know how to feel about this post, something bothers me about it but I don’t know what
In post 2788, mbaki wrote:most want to kill
{RC, Overkill}
{Creature, Chem}
{Oka, BEF}
{Chen, Titus}
{Ank, Clem}
least want to kill
You say I'm never killing you today, which I already said is probably true if you were actually sorting me and read my posts, but that doesn't matter. TMCK already wants to put you and not me nor one of my top 3 trs JE in the coalition. If we kill two townies today, there will be 11:3 14 alive and 8 in the coalition. That means we need every townie except 3, and me / JE not being in it makes it 1, and you being in it means its fails imo. Even if you're town (x doubt, but not impossible), me / JE not being in it makes it mathematically very very unlikely to succeed. So yes, sorting you and myself now is fine. And I don't mean sorting each other from our pov's, I mean from the rest of the thread.
So
In post 2866, RadiantCowbells wrote:the game will be over a significant amount of the time before any relevant slots start dying off and you should know this
the only reason for you to be having this fight right now is because you're trying to fight your way into the coalition over my objections. talking about game plans as scum?
how exactly is this true? from a town!me pov, how will the game be over a significant amount of time before any relevant slots die?
rc never answered this because it shows him posturing, by the way
Posted: Fri May 03, 2019 7:57 am
by Time Devil
In post 2946, Titus wrote:Best thing to do is NL then Veto. I get if I get roped but we never should have picked this.
Um no
-b
Posted: Fri May 03, 2019 8:00 am
by Time Devil
In post 2976, Titus wrote:I'm relatively confident in my theory but I'm not confident enough to risk obvious town. It's strategically suboptimal anyway. We can have this day pass while we discuss reads and then do veto tomorrow.
So do you suspect Nancy might be scum?
-b
Posted: Fri May 03, 2019 8:05 am
by Time Devil
I’m not really feeling befnoka, willing to vote there again to prevent a NL but for now VOTE: titus/chenn
