Mafiascum.net

In post 2989, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Oh shit, OK if I still have a shot I'll target Marci.

Didn't we establish that Chungus used his PR on Pooky?

In post 2982, Titus wrote:

In post 2980, MathBlade wrote:Marci can be one shot BP.

This false godfather clear wouldn't happen in a normal game. You're reaching.

I hate that you're just being opposite for the sake of being opposite. A rationally thinking mechanics based player would say proving Johnny and Luke/Malcolm is the right manuever because then it PoEs the game to you, me, marci, luke/malcolm.

The problem is you won't do that because you want every exit hatch open.

Titus, I am reading this, and it sounds like you are saying that the current PoE is You, Math, Marci, Me, Malcolm, and Johnny.

And you wanted to kill me to day, and clear johnny tonight - Which takes two of those people out of the POE, to end up with a final PoE of You, Math, Marci, and Malcolm.

What I am not following is why that path is strictly better, to the point of you and Math fighting over it, if Math wants to do Marci? Like, that also pulls two people out of the PoE that you seem to be presenting since you have every player being discussed as an option in your PoE to start with, right?

In post 2974, MalcolmTucker wrote:

In post 2902, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 2855, MalcolmTucker wrote:Luke seems town so far on their play. Didn't like BCG but suppose it's possible they largely just got disengaged given the replace out.

You called my play town until I voted you, and you called my vote on you inconsistent based on nothing

Your play alone since you started hadn't been scummy but STD's was incredibly scummy before they replaced out. I don't think it's at all beyond your ability to replace into a slot and come across as quite townie in a scum slot.

You still never even tried to show what you were calling inconsistent with me.

You called my position around you inconsistent without actually showing where you were claiming that was, when I called you out for it, your response was to walk it back and just call STD scummy?

In post 2999, Lukewarm wrote:What I am not following is why that path is strictly better, to the point of you and Math fighting over it, if Math wants to do Marci? Like, that also pulls two people out of the PoE that you seem to be presenting since you have every player being discussed as an option in your PoE to start with, right?

Because with our PRs clear, you and Math have nowhere to hide. The VCA screams that you're scum. Math is throwing a fit onto obvtown when his role is unverified.

We get confirmed matching slignments rather than clearing someone we should already know is town.

I'm on the Luke/Johnny scum team train.

In post 3002, Titus wrote:We get confirmed matching slignments rather than clearing someone we should already know is town.

I agree marci looks townie to me, so "don't use a clear on someone I think is town" makes sense, but then you had Marci in your PoE list, and that is where you lost me.

My last pick would be Maria.

MalcolmTucker, Titus, Toogeloo
JohnnyFarrar
MathBlade

Enchant, JohnnyFarrar, Lukewarm, Cape90, Titus, Toogeloo, MathBlade, marcistar, MariaR

modorator notes

• thread unlocked
  
• and hello

I have guilty.

I can verify it is possible for Enchant to have a guilty. I did rolecop him. He is not a vanilla.

I know based upon his role who it is likely on, but I think it's best to hear all results first.

I will not out Enchant's role.

Everyone, except for: Titus, MathBlade.

Fullclaim truthfully and state your action last night.

Titus should state my role after everyone else claim and confirm action. Afterwards, i tell on who i have guilty.

MathBlade will be more or less confirmed by stating results afterwards, so skipped for now.

Now i go silent.

In post 3014, Enchant wrote:Titus should state my role after everyone else claim and confirm action. Afterwards, i tell on who i have guilty.

MathBlade will be more or less confirmed by stating results afterwards, so skipped for now.

That's a great plan.

Everyone else.
Enchant.
Me.

Sorry
Everyone else
Math
Enchant
Me

In post 3017, Titus wrote:Sorry
Everyone else
Math
Enchant
Me

Uhmm no?

Enchant said
Everyone else
Me
You
Enchant

I am sus you’re not a rolecop and would like that confirmed please. I trust Enchant

In post 3014, Enchant wrote:Titus should state my role after everyone else claim and confirm action. Afterwards, i tell on who i have guilty.

MathBlade will be more or less confirmed by stating results afterwards, so skipped for now.

I can't confirm his action unless he claims it first. Logically impossible.

I already confirmed it's possible he has a guilty. I suspect he might actually have an implied guilty as well but logically he has at least 1 guilty.

No wait Math you're right on the order. I'm fine with the order.

In post 3019, Titus wrote:

In post 3014, Enchant wrote:Titus should state my role after everyone else claim and confirm action. Afterwards, i tell on who i have guilty.

MathBlade will be more or less confirmed by stating results afterwards, so skipped for now.

I can't confirm his action unless he claims it first. Logically impossible.

I already confirmed it's possible he has a guilty. I suspect he might actually have an implied guilty as well but logically he has at least 1 guilty.

Lmao what horse manure.

You’re not confirming enchant. He’s confirming you.

Let’s say Enchant is a cop tracker watcher follower all the time mega Joat. (This is made up not fishing)
Then if you are a role cop you know he is that long salad role.

Then you say Enchant is a cop tracker watcher follower Joat.
Enchant says I tracked X to NM or I copped Y and they came up scum.

You both confirm each other like that.

In post 3020, Titus wrote:No wait Math you're right on the order. I'm fine with the order.

Much better.